[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1785263134419702.mp4 (3.71 MB, 1280x720)
3.71 MB
3.71 MB MP4
its about to undergo orbital insertion in a few minutes
>>
>>110327934
they failed to catch both parts, so the exciting part is already over
>>
>>110327934
Why it matter?
>>
>>110327947
Isn't that the point?
>>
>>110327947
they failed the booster not he upper stage
they might still catch that one and thats the most exciting part
>>
>>110327934
Starship is a white elephant. There just aren't that many big payloads worth launching. It's only useful for vanity goals like reaching Mars.
>>
did i already miss it
>>
>>110327973
It will make orbital data centers economically viable.
>>
>>110328001
uhuh
>>
With all the happenings lately, I'm guessing the upper stage fails to land.
>>
>>110327973
>There just aren't that many big payloads worth launching
Yet. Specifically because there hasn't been a means to launch them economically
>>
File: 1792840692705494.mp4 (3.06 MB, 720x1280)
3.06 MB
3.06 MB MP4
>>110327973
there arent payloads because there was no capability. supply creates demand, they created big starlinks for the initial demand for it
>>110327977
yes
they lost the booster, the upper stage is doing well so far
>>
>>110328007
The only reason they're not is because it's too expensive getting all of that material up into orbit. If Starship is successful then it won't be too expensive to send it up there. It's as simple as that.
>>
>>110327973
what about a lot of little payloads all at once
>>
What went wrong with the booster?
>>
>>110327934
next is making a space platform, it was neat at first but it gets really tedious and you have to keep making new ones when you get better tech
>>
>>110327973
>big payloads worth launching
the point is to make those big payloads worth launching
>>
>>110328037
>If Starship is successful
that's a big if. betting the company and giving up on falcon-9 is typical white elephant behavior.
>>
I hope the landing fails so I can stock up some spcx.
>>
>>110328267
you should probably buy before they merge tesla into spacex in december
>>
File: 1794581583580.jpg (58 KB, 415x419)
58 KB JPG
>>
File: 1794581668571.jpg (102 KB, 648x751)
102 KB JPG
no-contact flush.
>>
>>110327934
Remember, this was supposed to be ready for a moon landing THIS YEAR.
>>
>>110328934
that's a camera they took a picture of your penis
>>
>>110327947
>>110327969
Failed to catch is an odd way of saying the booster imploded.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.