Going into 2027, what should your monitor's refresh rate be?
Never mind the refresh rate, look at the pixel persistence. It's a bullshit number if the display can't physically display the amount of frames pushed to it.
>>11033493860 fps has the most sense of speed
>>110334938144hz any more and you are larping
>>110334938ngl I don't even know my monitors refresh rate. 75 maybe? it's fine.
>>110334938280hz, 1440p, 27 inchNo display scaling needed, so it’s great for troonix
>>110334967This one is 180Hz at 1440, 32".Why don't OLEDs exist at this spec?
>>110334938The eye of a white man caps out around 27 FPS
>>110334975Eh, 27 inches is the biggest I can go for 1440p before the pixel density becomes a problem. I’m using the aw2726dl and it’s great.
>>110334967>109 DPI at 100% scaleCan't see shit.
>>110334938MacBooks don't have more than 120 Hz, so you don't need more.
>>110335000I actually came from the opposite school of thinking, as I saw 27" as the limit of my time with 1080p and if I ever wanted to venture above that resolution I would also want the screen size to go up with it.I got my dad a pair of 1080p 32" monitors last year for Christmas and, actually, they're not that bad but I already made up my mind that I wouldn't pursue any higher resolution on 27". I like the extra area this provides, since I'm not doing any scaling, and the PPI density is higher than 1080p at 27".
>>110334967Even GNU+Linux has fractional scaling now gramps.
>>110335046I need a few x11 apps and they scale like shit
I got a 240 Hz monitor last week but I have no stand for it and I'm not sure what to do with it yet.
>>110334962120 > 144, as its cleanly dividable by 60, 30 and 24
27", 4k, 60Hzthat's all you need
>>110334938Racing footage should never have motion blur in the first place
>>110335056Yeah you do need Wayland for scaling but then it works great.
120-240hz with Nvidia pulsar, very cheap otherwise I'll wait one more year.IPS ofc.24 inch 1080p
>>110335061>>110334962I have 200 and when I go down to 144 it feels horrible
>>110334938Even 60 Hz is overkill tbqh.
>>11033493850hz
>>110335061VRR solves this
>>110335061what matters more is calibrated screen response time across 40 to 145hz variance for proper adaptive sync experience
I got used to a big 4K monitor and it feels like a downgrade to go back to 1440p.
>>110334938I have a 144hz screen but I stick to 60. I don't use scaling either, so it's running at 1920x1080.
>>110334938That picture is funny because while a display can display 240 frames per second most still blur shit up somewhat
