Going into 2027, what should your monitor's refresh rate be?
Never mind the refresh rate, look at the pixel persistence. It's a bullshit number if the display can't physically display the amount of frames pushed to it.
>>11033493860 fps has the most sense of speed
>>110334938144hz any more and you are larping
>>110334938ngl I don't even know my monitors refresh rate. 75 maybe? it's fine.
>>110334938280hz, 1440p, 27 inchNo display scaling needed, so it’s great for troonix
>>110334967This one is 180Hz at 1440, 32".Why don't OLEDs exist at this spec?
>>110334938The eye of a white man caps out around 27 FPS
>>110334975Eh, 27 inches is the biggest I can go for 1440p before the pixel density becomes a problem. I’m using the aw2726dl and it’s great.
>>110334967>109 DPI at 100% scaleCan't see shit.
>>110334938MacBooks don't have more than 120 Hz, so you don't need more.
>>110335000I actually came from the opposite school of thinking, as I saw 27" as the limit of my time with 1080p and if I ever wanted to venture above that resolution I would also want the screen size to go up with it.I got my dad a pair of 1080p 32" monitors last year for Christmas and, actually, they're not that bad but I already made up my mind that I wouldn't pursue any higher resolution on 27". I like the extra area this provides, since I'm not doing any scaling, and the PPI density is higher than 1080p at 27".
>>110334967Even GNU+Linux has fractional scaling now gramps.
>>110335046I need a few x11 apps and they scale like shit
I got a 240 Hz monitor last week but I have no stand for it and I'm not sure what to do with it yet.
>>110334962120 > 144, as its cleanly dividable by 60, 30 and 24
27", 4k, 60Hzthat's all you need
>>110334938Racing footage should never have motion blur in the first place
>>110335056Yeah you do need Wayland for scaling but then it works great.
120-240hz with Nvidia pulsar, very cheap otherwise I'll wait one more year.IPS ofc.24 inch 1080p
>>110335061>>110334962I have 200 and when I go down to 144 it feels horrible
>>110334938Even 60 Hz is overkill tbqh.
>>11033493850hz
>>110335061VRR solves this
>>110335061what matters more is calibrated screen response time across 40 to 145hz variance for proper adaptive sync experience
I got used to a big 4K monitor and it feels like a downgrade to go back to 1440p.
>>110334938I have a 144hz screen but I stick to 60. I don't use scaling either, so it's running at 1920x1080.
>>110334938That picture is funny because while a display can display 240 frames per second most still blur shit up somewhat
>>110335663More importantly a low frame rate screen doesn't blur up the image, it just drops frames.Unless you use some frame merging technique on purpose to make the footage look smoother.
Trying to decide between 165Hz 4K or 240Hz 4KDP 2.1 vs HDMI 2.1Q-DOLED vs WOLEDdunnojust dunno
i can't even imagine buying a 1080p monitor in the year of our lord 2026
