>>462518
LMAO just pirate Adobe, like every non retarded person

>>462547
And don't forget to prevent any adobe apps from accessing the interwebs.

>>462518
Fucking crazy if true, I'm bracing myself for it, but I don't think they'll be full retard just yet. Their marketing of "what's coming" might genuinely be great new features, but their marketing sucks horribly.

- Unengaging snippets
- Starting to leak hints of *a* vector-based feature, but nothing much more than closeups of whatever new feature is in action.
- Poor response when people ask questions or express worries.
- Still no Ae killer.

I'm fearing it'll just be one or two features. Whatever it is, they felt it necessary to halt their entire suite from being purchased, which makes me feel like they are moving to a subscription service.
At least, it'll be some half-ass AI feature that may be free, or may be an "optional" subscription service. That is, until their new app progresses and they make it's use or subscription potentially mandatory.

Hell yeah, I'm paranoid, maybe a little butthurt. A few months ago, I vouched for them because I genuinely like the software, despite it's limitations. At this point, they need to have something that rivals After Effects either on the way, or ready for release tomorrow, otherwise, this hype could've literally been delivered via email.

They have a lot to add, before even thinking of charging people more, or moving to a subscription. If they do go that route, they're dead to me, for whatever it's worth.

>>462549
>no AE killer
Just use DaVinci Resolve. Where's the problem?