concerns?
besides some interesting gfx and dont want to shit on your 'creative spirit' and it's cool that you are trying out different things and working with vector graphics and it's working visually but i hate it because it appears informational at first but it's just filled with meaningless mind numbing gibberish with words that sound fancy to a juvenile pseud who likes to pretend he reads books or something
>>462850>MY. ANAL.[+] WALLS. ARE.[01] COLLAPSING. (INTESTINAL ->> TISSUE)
>>462850wow it is so derivative, kitsch and plaiy shallow. it serves no point other than caricaturizing the entirety of your favourite pinterest board, seasones with manchild podcast verbiage and stolen pseudo-mysticism. merely suited to be sold at h&m, just after the referenced subculture already started moving on to other aesthetic developments.the center text element is well made. but the whole thing is just hedonistic masturbation. equivalent to drip paintings done by alcoholic moms who try to escape having to look at the harsh reality of finding themselves in a life without noteworthy agency.
random meaningless shit wow so cool
>>462864making safe knockoffs of shit that exists is a good way to learndon't say you weren't making derivative geometric/foliage/splatter brush vomit wallpapers and forum signatures gfx just like all the others in 2005the use of various photoshop and/or illustrator tools in this one is mostly competent and could apply to something functional. at least it's not some completely directionless retard xD ps filter vomit
>>462869fine. I accept value in adding your perspective to the discussion, but I deny it questioning my given criticism.the final result has exactly the problems I mentioned, mainly that of dishonesty and (grotesque?) derivation. and while it is true that in the confines of your private workspace it is more than okay to produce the trash that makes 80% of what we create, framing and putting it in a public pedestal to be viewed is something else entirely. >bigger boi setting asks for bigger boi feedbackzin the context of public artworks it *is* trash that doesn't add anything but regurgitates cultural production into an even more acidic turd.>human centipede art. of which there exists more than enough alreadyand if OP is smart they will realize how much more value there is in my seemingly antagonistic reality check over reinforcing their rigid, asset-vomit, prompt-completion process with sugary words.>but feel free to point out what you think is the most important lesson for OP to learn at this point(?)
