How come post WW2 Modernism wasnt as extreme as Post WW1 Modernism? You'd think it would have been even more radical and schizophrenic than the interwar modernism of Futurism/Dada/Surrealism/Cubism etc etc since it was a reaction to the brutality of the 1st world war. Instead it was just mundane Andy Warhol type shit.
Bump
>>18486683Modernism is just accelerationism, have you never put 2+2 together about the fact that all modernists/futurists are fascists and dream of a world born out of massive genocide of undesirables? Even you subconsciously in your meme are calling for a world of "futurist giga chads" and the traditionalists to die. Modernism is just fascism
>>18486683WW1 was just a LARP compared to WW2. WW2 fucked up so many people and destroyed so much civilization that when all that shit was over people honestly just wanted stability, not something radical.
>>18487445So what's post modernism?
>>18487445the image doesnt wish death on traditionalists, youre projecting.
>>18486683>How come post WW2 Modernism wasnt as extreme as Post WW1 ModernismI don't think that statement is true
>>18486683The art historical nature of this inquiry begs for some context though, which um unless i am mistaken is asking about an aesthetic that hypostasizes the radical and the schizophrenic as a texture that ‘can be read like patterns of thoughts and architectonic idea-sensations from the text’ and this is relevant to cubism because the theory for cubism was broken off midway through the war and never completed all the way and part of the way that art comes down is also a challenger to older classical representative art that relied on perspective but in the universe of newton became more and more deterministic and there are several ways that the sources to modernism might get grounded or emphasized the nineteenth century though is when that aesthetic of the modern begins to take awareness of that aesthetic as an aesthetic, and part to that is an artist like duchamp does not always get responded to immediately or the art does always find response from other art immediately especially with the demand that art makes on art and on composition if those demands are especially radical, duchamp is still reckoned with
>>18486683it was just as extreme, you are wrong
