how come WW1 saw multiple large scale mutinies / revolutions not even 2 years into the conflict while WW2 didn't have anything like this?
The invention of communication like phones and computers made it a lot easier for the state to surveillance people and stop them from planning mutinies
Being used as a meat shield in a squabble between European royalty is a lot less popular than fighting to protect your family and people from an army of murder-rape psychos on drugsm
>>18488000>protect your family and peoplehow does this apply to the UK, Canada, the US?
>>18488015>uk"irish out, poles in" moment was in danger of being interrupted
>>18487816>while WW2 didn't have anything like this?Nigga what is decolonization?Nigga what is round 2 of the Chinese Civil War?
>>18488015>UK>the place that was being bombed round the clock
WW1>seriously what the fuck are we here for?WW2>I know what I'm fighting for! (even if it's a bullshit lie)
>>1848802899% of britain remained unharmed, it only really hit londonthere was no plan to genocide them, axis forces never set foot onto UK territoryin the case of the ussr you could make the argument that they didn't revolt because they realized that they would just end up getting Operation Faustschlagd 2.0
>>18488045>>seriously what the fuck are we here for?none of this is ofc backed up by real statistics but weren't french soldiers keen on getting back alsace-lorraine?I guess Brits had no real reason to fight
>>18488061a lot more places than london were affected, that claim alone shows you don't know what you're talking about. and you you really think people didn't care about a German invasion, as there was no plan to genocide them? bro you legitimately sound like you're 14
>>18488061The entire city of Coventry was turned to dust stupid fuck.
>>18488015>>18488061Besides being blockaded of course
>>18487816WW1 was far more of a brutal war of attrition. For example, the Allies suffered 620,000 casualties in the Battle of the Somme for only a few miles of territorial gain.
>>18488455But they also killed an equal number of Germans, quite impressive for a ww1 era offensive.
>>18488410Britain genocided Napoleonic France with decades of blockades
>>18487895Midwit historylet take
>>18488069French mutinied and refused to attack because they could see they were being launched into retarded meatgrinders
>>18487816ww1 was an intra-imperialist war where the common soldier had nothing to gainww2 was an existential struggle for anyone the axis invaded
>>18487895Petard, WW1's static frontlines would be easier to observe/police compared to WW2's massive & dynamic frontlines
>>18489285>>18489483Edgar Hoover firing up his IBM in 1941 and personally flagging pro-Japan shitposts was an unthinkable idea for Tsar Nicholas
>>18489518Yeah Russia and Austria were super lax in early 20th century and there was legitimate freedom for many people in those societies, but it's not like any Hitler underling could micromanage soldiers grumbling in their trenches in Ukraine
>>18487816why would they need a revolution