>Europe converts to Christcuckery>A thousand years on and the White race is on the verge of extinction, Europe has more non-Europeans in it than at anytime in the previous three thousand plus years, and there isn't a single governmental office in the whole world whose purpose it is to retain White powerRight, so... perhaps worshipping a jewish rabbi wasn't the most racially conscious thing to do...
Without Judeo-Christianity and its values, we would have torn each other apart far earlier.
>>18490523>>A thousand years onAnd which religious trends have occured at the time of the actual social changes you're complaining about? If you went back to anywhere in Europe between 1000-1700 the idea you're espousing would be laughed out of town. Because you ignore the number one actually correlative religious trend with suicidal ethnic marxism and liberalism. You're a complete clown
>>18490529>with suicidal ethnic marxism and liberalismAnd from where does their moral framework came from?
>>18490534With the explicit rejection of divine rulership and the tenants of liberal philosopher J.S. Mills explicitly intended to remove Church heirarchy from government in favor of mercantilism. Orthodox Christianity in Georgia Greece and Serbia has preserved ethnic states under literally hundreds of years of Muslim oppression and has now created extremely nationalist communities who completely drove out the foreign invaders and genocided the ones who remained after World War 1 and 2. And yet you're so psyopped you think the main organizing tenant of the few people fighting (on behalf of athiests and agnostics) for racial stewardship is the problem.>Moral frameworkthere is no moral framework for the new elites, it is not objective. Christianity and clergy involvement in government promotes objective morality. The direct opposite, you could not be further
>If I tell you being gay is wrong it's actually my fault homosexuality exists because I gave you the moral framework to think about itYour brain on woke reich
>>18490545Communism is jewish like Christianity, Jesus was the firs Bolshevik. They will tell you this themselves.Communism, like Christianity, is an ideology about the losers of society. They both seek the same ends, to make everyone the same - but with jews exempt (Jews get religious, legal, and financial privileges in Christian societies; jews run the party in communist societies).
>>18490555Does Islam want to make everybody the same too?>inb4 redirecting and whataboutismYou have many opportunities to ask actual questions. I actually answer yours so it's fair you actually make the case
>>18490559I disavow Abrahamism as a whole, so I don't know what you think you're accomplishing bringing that up. But I will say - and I'll definitely get brown for this as there's no way faster way to get called brown than to be a White Nationalist - is that Islam is a religion of war and conquest. Mohammed - as much of a Zuttslut he was and a fake prophet - didn't advocate for abolition of slavery (slavery is good for enforcing a caste system) and doesn't preach its Arab followers to denounce and absolve their race. He did say to convert everyone, but not necessarily at the expense of the Arab people. Or maybe I'm wrong, I actually don't care, as I disavow this religion anyway.I'm Agnostic.
>>18490525>Judeo-ChristianityNo such thing, Christianity succeeded Judaism and Rabbinical Judaism has nothing to do with ancient Judaism
>>18490565What in your opinion is the differing variable between western societies which used to value monoculture and monofaith, and middle eastern societies which still value those things, and even pretty much any Christian country that isn't western still does too. For me the answer is very easy but it's not for you, it can't be Abrahamism and it can't be Christianity broadly
>>18490539>Dodging the questionAs expected
>>18490622>If I define liberalism in Christian language and ignore the bits of liberalism that explicitly reject Christianity liberalism is Christian.Where did the liberal "moral framework" of not caring about which religion someone was and intentionally arguing against societal cohesion because it's "opressive" originate from? And how come Christian countries that are not western still care about it? You're asking "where do ideas come from". As I said, complete clown.
>>18490628>Where did the liberal "moral framework" of not caring about which religion someone wasBasic human decency? The problem starts when they try to impose themselves on you>and intentionally arguing against societal cohesion because it's "opressive" originate from?Your whole religion is founded over being opressed, and getting rid of society because the rapture is (was) about to happen at any time now. Paul explicitly told people to stop following roman empire rules and sell their goods in lay for Jesus return. When Jesus didn't return, that was when your doomsday religion stopped following Jesus and turned into another tool of the very same opression the old christians rejected.
>>18490652You are arguing against a fictional Christian in your head anon. 1500s nobility were not trying to destroy society and prepare for the rapture. In fact, it is because they weren't that we're not brown muslim rape babies right now.
>>18490652>Paul explicitly told people to stop following roman empire rules and sell their goods in lay for Jesus returnAnd before you say 'romans 13', its remarkable how Paul wrote that after christians from Jesus's generation started to die out, as Romans was wrote years after Thessalonians, where he copes with Jesus failing his second coming. Interesting, right?
>SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
