why is slavery le bad exactly?
>>18491773You can end on the receiving end of it? Did you even study political science?
>>18491773the same reason why murder, rape, stealing and skining infants alive is, it just is
>>18491773Humans are made in the image of God and have inherent dignity. Slavery is spitting in the face of that.
the fate of many a' nordic twink who wound up in the grasp of the med bvll
>>18491773If slavery were bad, the institution would not have explicitly been maintained and lifted to constitutional status by the 13th amendment.The United State's rise after the Civil War demonstrated that slavery is clearly necessary for the general Welfare, and security of the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterit and the fate of all the nations that outlawed it demonstrate the correctness of that policy.
>>18491773White slavery ended with the spread and adoption of christianity because they are the children of God set free in Christ.Non whites were set free recently because until then they were correctly regarded as the dark hell-spawned demons which seek their destruction.
>>18491869>White slavery ended with the spread and adoption of christianity*laughs in 13th Amendments*
>>18491795>Slaves, obey your masters
>>18491773Morality (what we ought to do) is just based on the brain's reward systems, which associates values to acts and situations. This brain's reward system releases certain chemicals when XYZ is performed, which is simply a byproduct of evolution and natural selection.Guilt was born out of this evolutionary trait, which made us be able to project ourselves onto others and feel empathy.Slavery is bad, because we wouldn't to be slaves, because evolutionary pressures have historically selected for relative freedom. That's it. Also, one thing funny about the picture is that they had to picture the slave purchaser as a fat ugly guy to prompt disgust in the reader's eye. If the roles were reversed, the same biological mechanisms responsible for morally considering slavery to be bad would be tempered.
>>18491908I am so glad this soulless bugman view on humanity from the late 2000s/early 2010s is over
>>18491908Hurry up and die.
>>18491786Rape isn't inherently bad, its how our ancestors reproduced. Laws only exist because "hurting wimmin is le bad and it makes our feel bads hurt" or something.
>>18491888Unless you're talking about indentured slaves, you sorely missed the point
>>18491978So there's no reason my boys and I can't run a train on your asshole then.
>>18491773you're right, slavery isn't bad. You're my slave now. Bend over, property, I'm going to fuck you in the ass.
>>18492436Just like democracy, gang rape is the will of the majority
>>184917731. It is cruel and inhumane2. It is inefficient with modern technology3. It makes the societies owning slaves more degenerate and decadent, and therefore weaker, than societies that don't own slaves
>>18491773plot twist:He actually treats her very well and runs a school where he gets cheap slaves and trains them to be sold for a profit.
>>18491773Depends on the context.But in general, it inherently engenders social conflict and it creates a manpower/consumption imbalance.Both issues are purely pragmatic and together they utterly undermine the utility of slavery in all but the most extreme cases of low tech resource extractive expansionism, and even then it's just a matter of extreme benefits barely overtaking extreme societal damage.Basically if you're not Rome strip mining mountains you're better off dealing with employees. Notice also that Rome dialed back the practice effectively the second expansion slowed down.
>>18491773Unprofitable for the owner and can be very oppressive for the slave with moral degradation for the owner also being a concern
doujin name?
>>18492390White people can and are being enslaved at the discretion of a judge, for crimes as low as not paying a fine on time. It's a power granted to the courts by the United States constitution.
>>18493093>Unprofitable for the ownerNot really. Plenty of people have made revenue off businesses they ran using slaves.>moral degradation for the owner also being a concernThat comes with any top-down system where the guy up top can more or less determine if you can live in a house or fail to pay rent and get kicked to the streets. Labour is just fucked up like that.
>>18492456>1. It is cruel and inhumane>2. It is inefficient with modern technology>3. It makes the societies owning slaves more degenerate and decadent, and therefore weaker, than societies that don't own slavesPretty broad strokes on both societies. I feel like people oversimplify this too much.
>>18493093>>18493112If slavery were unprofitable, the South would not have bought slaves for work and the North would not have bred slaves for sale.
>>18491773it's not bad but slaves aren't consumers so they aren't profitable for the capitalist class therefor >we decided to get rid of them
>>18491773They make you work but they don't pay you or let you go.
>>18493127>if the indians were unprofitable the west would not have imported indians for work and the jews wouldn't breed indians for immigrationTo be fair, uncompetitive is indeed a more apt term
>>18493525DESU, Indians are used because bringing costs down is easier than increasing productivity and the people whom CEOs report to are imbeciles who want line to go up.
>>18491785but if i dont there's nothing bad with it so what's your point
>>18493559Not exactly profitable is it
>>18491773what manga is this?
