>just mass produce the maus tankThat hunking, late war abomination that can't cross a bridge without it crumbling, can't cross marshes or wet terrain and serve as nothing more than airforce target practice when they run out of fuel in three minutes? Yeah, okay.>just speedrun the nukeWouldn't have been possible until mid-late war, when shit was already bad enough they would have only had enough material to make maybe only one or two, and good luck gaining enough air superiority to smack any target worth a damn. Not even mentioning codebreaking and the high probability of plans being stolen caused from already overstretched intel security.>just proceed with sealionThe Kriegsmarine wasn't ever going to cross that channel as long as the cartoonishly uncontested Royal Navy was obsessively watching it.>just don't betray the sovietsThe Soviets would have betrayed them first, then.>just secure the caucuses for all that oillol>just produce more tigers and get the jet engine finished quickGerman engineering is notorious for slipping into that "overengineering" pitfall, which would have put even more of a strain on their already overbeared industry they had. Too many parts, too much training, not enough time.>just don't declare war on the united stateslol>well.... just get a better industry then!!!!!I'm all ears for that idea.It was mathematically impossible for the Nazis.
>>18493842Since all of their early successes against France and Britain were basically luck, let's add another lucky break: the halt order is ignored or poorly implemented, the Dunkirk evacuation fails and basically the entirety of the British Army becomes prisoner of war. Would this force the Brits to surrender or at the very least accept a ceasefire? And if the Brits accept a ceasefire, how would this impact Nazi planning for Barbarossa?
>>18493842>>just speedrun the nukedo they really say that?kekjapan probably had a better chance making a nuke than germany during the third reichgermany completely fucked their physics research with their "DA JOOOOS" purity spirallingnazis almost arrested heisenberg because he wanted to do "jewish physics"
>>18493842Where do they insist this?Germany clearly had more than a chance as they defeated Poland and France in a combined 70 days - two countries that had previously stalemated/defeated German forces in head-on pitched battles.>Maus TankEverything you said about it can be said about ALL modern Tanks.>nukeWould have been possible in the 30s actually.The nuke question was a question of inventing the wheel, the first time.Not easy and not obvious, but as we can see even third world shitholes like israel and iran can get 'the bomb', would have been easy for Germany to acquire a nuke if they knew it was possible and worth it.>Sealion1. The Kriegsmarine literally did cross the channel, the long way, in one of the most embarrassing humiliations the Royal Navy ever faced.2. A Sealion doesnt require defeating the Royal Navy, it would require only perforating British defenses which could be done if they had planned for it more than literally 40 days before it was operationally possible.>SovietsThe Soviets did betray them first, they still took more land in a shorter amount of time than any army in history before or since.>Caucasuslaff till it hurts but multiple countries have defeated Russia here both before and after.>Tigers and JetsThey worked and they worked well. There was no "overengineering" pitfall, they were pioneering their fields and were by far the best at what they did.>USThe US is only a factor if they have the political capital, removing this is possible but would take planning.>mathematically impossibleWhy? Its mathematically impossible for Afghanistan to defeat the United States.yet they did.Its mathematically impossible for Hezbollah to defeat Israel, yet they did.Same for Iran vs the US.Chechnya vs RussiaUkraine vs RussiaMathematical calculations are exactly why the US LOST in vietnam lol.
>>18493842>Why do so many wehraboos insist that Germany actually had a chance?Because it makes them feel good when they do.
>>18493842>The Soviets would have betrayed them first,Actually factually wrong, the Soviets wanted germany to fight the west forever if possible. The Soviets would have supplied them with weapons and resources indefinitely specially if it meant germans killing americans. In other words, the Soviets would have only attacked nazi germany around 1945-1948 at the earliest. Why would they attack germany while the west is still strong? The plan was for all he west to be weakened, or at last all of europe, and then quickly conquer them all and turn them Communist
>>18493842Didn't the germans consider nuclear physics jewish bullshit or something like that?
>>18497205no, thats something liberals promulgate because they think anyone on the right is an anti science blumpftard nazi
>>18493842>The Soviets would have betrayed them first, then.Nope
>>18493842>just don't betray the soviets>The Soviets would have betrayed them first, then.You actually have no proof of this. It's the same kind of "trust me bro" logic that you simultaniously seem to be criticizing.
what if... they just didnt invade poland at all? just chilled after taking Czechoslovakia.
