[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (742 KB, 1280x905)
742 KB PNG
Have there ever been any major migrations that went East instead of always going West? Seems like they never went east.
>>
>>18496338
Slavs and Dorians. If you mean Germanics, the Goths took Crimea and Justinian deported the Vandals to the Persian border.
>>
>>18496338
who the fuck wants to settle in the steppes?
>>
>>18496338
>Have there ever been any major migrations that went East instead of always going West?

Literally every single fucking invasion of Persia/India/China by steppeshitters. But the problem with "migrating East" was that it's home to bigass Empires and great big populations already so its less about migrating for these conquerors and more like taking over the management.

If you really want a strictly West=>East narrative then Alexander's Invasions, Roman Conquests saw migrations of Westroons eastwards in an attempt to be part of the wealthy trade networks of Asia. The Crusades can also be considered a "barbarian invasion" from the West through Medieval Islamic & Byzantine Narratives.
>>
>>18496383
No I'm not taking about liberal brainwashing where attacking/empire expansion = simple migration. I mean strictly migrations of people uprooting and leaving to settle elsewhere.
>>
File: l4g31uywtvk21.jpg (237 KB, 1280x842)
237 KB JPG
Ostsiedlung and arguably the Romans expanded East
>>
File: ukraine.jpg (122 KB, 960x786)
122 KB JPG
>>18496338
russians
>>
Yeah, by the Yamnaya. It even predates their migrations to the west. One migration ended up settling down near the Indus valley, and the other near the central asian montain valleys/north taklamakan. What happened to the former before the Scythians remigrated there, is harder to guess. The latter on the other hand is known to have much more longevity, thanks to the silk road; it was attested to by the greeks as bactria and the chinese as loulan and is substantiated by the existence of the tocharian language (indo-european) in the regions archaeology and basically confirmed by mummies found in the region matching more closely with modern europeans than asians. And yeah, as anon above said; Russian conquest of siberia resulted in settlement and is close enough to be considered a migration.
>>
>>18496350
The Goths were one of the few groups to settle it since the neolithic. Until the centaurs came I bet life was good there.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.