why does this decade trigger people so much?
>>18497976They are degenerates. It's that simple. The idea that prosperity, stability, and tradition are inherently good infuriates the spiritual losers. Look at Little Boxes by Malvina Reynolds. Some bitch wrote a song saying how terrible it was that people, oftentimes men who had the GI Bill, were able to buy a home and raise their families. Not apartments, actual homes that could last for generations, and a neighborhood full of other good people. They have to pretend there was dysfunction, that things were just the worst and everyone was suffering. Humans are just suckers for pain.
>>18497976It doesn’t trigger me, Im jealous. Boomers got to grow up when housing was basically government subsidized and your union job guaranteed you a pension and 30+ years of employment with education and further career opportunities if you sought to seek it out. It was pretty sweet and now it’s all gone.
>>18497976Post counter-culture generations think they discovered love and sex. The idea that there were people who lived happy fulfilling lives under more restrictive("oppressive") social orders is blasphemous to social liberals.
/pol/ would hate living in the 50s and they wouldn't get laid then anymore than now.>marriages are still more transactional than about love>you can only date someone of the same race/religious denomination/socioeconomic tier as yourself>dates are rigidly supervised>unless you're attending university you'd be expected to marry within a few years of high school
>>18497982>muh new deal is the reason for post-war prosperityPretty much every country except the UK experienced a post-war boom regardless of economic approach, from Francoist Spain to socialist Israel to South Korea.
>>18497987the plus is that women were a lot more likely to be a virgin when you got them. the lack of legal access to birth control and abortion definitely deterred thottery.
>>18497991All those countries subsidized housing though.
>>18497987The simple fact is that anyone who’s a loser now would be a loser in any other time period. Especially with how easy education is to access now.
>>18497976the dad is an alcoholic with war PTSD who beats the wife who is cheating on him with the newspaper boy. the daughter goes on to become a bra burning feminist and the boy becomes gay because the parish priest molested him
>>18498002nah, the boy dies in 'nam and the girl becomes a hippie.
>>18497976poltards be like>in the 50s everyone was happy and rich and had good households because that's what's on those old coca cola ads! do you really think ads are a mirror to reality? are you really this stupid?
>>18498002Why do leftists always project their own broken upbringing onto others?
>>18497976It was the 1950s men who made sure that their daughters went to college so that they would never become anyone's stay-at-home housewives. The 1950s men themselves did not think that their children should live like they did.
>ugh so based, so tra->*blocks ur path*>*Starts swinging his hips to that evil devil's music known as rock n roll*How do you respond without sounding like a square?
>>18498050Use my retrocausal telepathy to push him into a drug addiction and get him so fat he dies of a heart attack on the toilet.
>>18497976That decade ragebaited boomers so hard that in the 60s they decided to destroy everything about the 50s and now America is GigaHonduras
>>18497987>>18497997This is categorically not true. Current day period is an aberration in terms of how easy it is to a shut-in loner, back then you didn't have high-access low-effort stimulations the way people have today. Television was only just starting its rise and television alone is nowhere near as harmful as the internet and smartphones turned out to be. Socially stunted people existed since the beginning of time, but you're delusional if you think there aren't more of them today.
>>18498012Nigga that's literally a photo and not an ad, retard
>>18498058This, everybody shitting on 50s America is coping
>>18497987Everything you listed refuted what you said before it.
>>18497987>>marriages are still more transactional than about loveSo, just like now?>>you can only date someone of the same race/religious denomination/socioeconomic tier as yourself>>dates are rigidly supervised>>unless you're attending university you'd be expected to marry within a few years of high schoolSo what?
>>18497991South Korea was a bit of a dump still. Things started to improve during the course of the next decade.
>>18498068This is because you saw linear charts which give the impression nothing was going on. In reality growth was strong since the 50's, that's why you should view such charts in logarithmic
>>18498058Intellectuals were denouncing TV as brain rot back then though.
my grandma spent the 50s harvesting tomatoes in the hot sun all day while also caring for four kids
>>18497987Everything you listed is a good thing. Marriage being about love is a modern psyop.
>>18497981>the beatnik decade wasn't degenerateYou're a low information individual.
>>18498155They were right. It's just gotten even worse.
>>18498166>Marriage being about love is a modern psyop.Is this how you cope with being single and bitter?
>>18498058>>18498155>>18498177You fucking retards, the smartest people today are way smarter than the greatest minds of the past. People like Einstein and Newton would look like down syndrome kids next to modern scientists building space lasers or DNA weapons. Even the average kid is smarter despite all the brainrot, travel back in time to the 1900s and give people cellphones and not a single person would be able to figure out how to use them. Meanwhile kids are geniuses who can perfectly navigate hardware and software, not to mention digital spaces like the internet
>>18497976everyone loves the idea of living in a shitty mass produced house, eating Jell-O Salad, and driving an Oldsmobile that lasts about 60,000 miles and will horribly mangle you in a low speed accident.
>>18497987This was meant in the most literal sense. Even different white groups didn't intermarry back then--Italians only married other Italians, Irish other Irish, WASPs other WASPs, etc.
>>18497976Happy Whites
I don't hate any decade. I think history is cool. What I hate is vicarious nostalgia for a given decade, decades that the people gooning over them have never actually lived through, because if you were to actually look at the 50s under any real scrutiny it suddenly becomes less exceptional for the average person.
>>18497976cause the corporate tax was 50%
>>18497976Doesn't me. I lived it.
>>18498528most who were adults in the 50s are dead now so we just have the takes of boomers who were 6 years old and didn't have to worry about job opportunities or paying bills. being 6 years old in 1958 was not the same as being 30 in 1958.
it might have been cool for Americans but most of the planet wasn't America and didn't have so nice or thriving 1950s
I do find it funny that the expansion of suburbia that is characteristic of this decade is now seen as a bad thing for some reason even though it's often seen as one of the positive highlights of the 50s at the same time. To be clear, I'm not one of those retards that seethe over suburbs, I just find this dichotomy funny
>>18497992Imagine the kind of awful unfulfilling sex you would be having with some 5/10 virgin lmao
>>18498571Decolonization was ongoing and many countries had economic booms.
>>18498581that generation grew up in the Depression and had nothing, suburbia was an aspirational thing. their kids and grandkids didn't like it because they already had it. familiarity breeds contempt.
>>18498586porn addicts may as yet realize that women's inability to pair-bond worsens with each sexual partner they've had. if your wife has never known any dick but yours she has nothing to compare it unfavorably to.
>>18498581>I'm not one of those retards that seethe over suburbsoh yeah the "I want to live comfortably without a car like the rest of the developed world" crowd, what an unreasonable bunch
>>18498687Every country on Earth has a car culture anon. Also I don't drive, I'm a cyclistchad, and you could be too if you weren't too busy seething over houses you'll never own and actually got off your fat ass once in awhile
>>18498571I'm sorry about your '50s, Wotold.
>>18498586>unfulfillinghow? if you trivialize sex by engaging in promiscuity then it's just a mechanical act like masturbation. frying your dopamine receptors with strangers only hurts the emotional fulfillment, coomer-kun
>>18498687>like the rest of the developed world>t. sheltered armchair urbanist who has never stepped foot outside of his apartment let alone his country
>>18498581Both are right. It was comfy for them at the time. But it had negative consequences that made it a bad idea in retrospect.
I find that the only people who don't like suburbs are people who don't actually live in one, it's like a weird sour grapes thing. That's why all their arguments just boil down to vague appeal to emotions or they resort to just spamming aerial photographs of random Levittowns even though most suburbs aren't even Levittowns. It's the equivalent of /pol/tards spamming photos of random ghettos in cities they'll never visit to make the case that cities ran by politicians they don't like are shitholes even if that's not the case. Grandstanding arguments about urban design are simply not backed by data and never have been
>>18498691you have no frame of reference because you haven't lived in america + somewhere else (barring shitholes like latam or africa, can't discount that possibility). I have nothing against detached houses, even neighborhoods zoned for single family lots can be pedestrian/transit friendly - just not in most of this country. also I hope your city rips out its bike paths you cocksucking motorist simp
>>18498717No matter what country you live in you'd still be a loser that never leaves their home because you're a socially awkward autist who is afraid of fucking sidewalks
>>18498715I was raised my entire childhood in the suburbs. They are a blight. They had already laid substantial groundwork for social atomization before the internet, social media, phones, etc. did their part.
>>18498719>never leaves their homehuh? if that were so then I'd be like you, happy to wallow in shit because I've never seen what's missing>you're a socially awkward autistkek you're on 4chan, who are you fooling? no self-awareness is an aspie trait btw
>>18498731I had the complete opposite experience.The suburbs were great because they were like a little island of what America used to be. Now they’re unpleasant with everyone being brown and terminally online/inside.
>>18498586>sex is meant to FULFILL ME ITS ABOUT MY PERSONAL PLEASUREboomer moment.Other people exist besides yourself.
>>18498668Decolonization was bad. It took intelligent White peoples who are necessary for dumbass chimps to progress through the tech tree and removed them, now the morons of Asia and Africa and Latam become mired in this hellish halfway house between Industrial Revolution and modernity. Unable to move on, unable to go back.Just objectively better for everyone if the race that invented computers and the Geneva convention rules everything and everyone.
>>18498059that's not a photo that's ai slop you fucking peabrained brown retard, check your eyesight.
>>18497976>why does this decade trigger people so much?Because giving the rights of God's children to the dark hell-spawned demons was supposed to improve things for everyone, but it only made things worse for everybody.
>>18497976>ragebaits boomers because FUCK YOU, DAD>ragebaits women/ethnic/sexual minorities because they were (genuinely) discriminated against>ragebaits lefty types because ugh those ugly rightwing chuds like it so it must be badThat's easily ~80% of the population
>>18497976>why does this decade trigger people so much?
>>18497976They get angry at the thought that their shitty worldview is bad for the world and it makes them furious to consider the idea that their political opinions about America might actually not be best for America and maybe America would be better if people listened to someone else instead. Basically that image makes people feel triggered because their view of what America should be is proven wrong.They realize that everything they stand against was actually good for America. The first thought they have when they see that image is that life sucked in the 50s and everything was awful and nobody was happy and nobody was ever happy and things were never good but things will be so much better if we embrace communism and they can't possibly be wrong and america was never good etc. because if it was good that means they are wrong tho lol.
>>18498719This is such a weird projection. People like Richard Spencer and Andrew Tate have pointed out how terrible things are now compared to the late 1990s even let alone the 1950s.These are the opposite of awkward autists perhaps too much in the opposite direction of awkward autists.This just seems like projection on your part.No one is afraid of sidewalks or going out.People just don’t really go out anymore due to atomization.I mean aren’t you a Marxist? Shouldn’t this be expected? Marx said capitalism will lead to an atomization of the worker and feelings of isolation as capital becomes an ever more dominant force eroding traditional folkish modes of life.Sort of weird Marx had essays worth of writings saying literally everything the far right today is saying, yet Leftroons will oppose the far right, and their most prominent theory-hero, just to oppose the far right.As if opposing the far right and not the uplifting of the proletariat was the goal.You know I think there’s something going on there.If the left put down the anti-right rhetoric they’d find powerful friends in an ironclad critique of modernity and a revolution right around the corner.But instead they have fallen for the b8 of “think of da heckin thirdies and boomers and Chuds and trannies.”What happened to the practical lefties?What happened to the Lennists and LaRouchuds?Drop this “racism is the unforgivable crime” bullshit and you might actually get a revolution that wins, in a human country not a Slavic shithole.
>>18498939I think that they are so radical they feel they can never go back. Like once you troon your kid you can never undo that, and you can never abandon troonism because to do so would cause immense psychological pain, coming to grips with sacrificing your child’s life and fate to a cult of mutilated sex pests.Theyll lie, trick, deceive, delusionmaxx, anything to avoid admitting the truth because they are too far gone.I am not sure if killing could ever ever be merciful but in the case of liberals I find the strongest argument for it.
>>18498965I think I triggered you because you just responded with a massive tard crashout that I'm not going to bother reading. I called you a shut-in autist because your response was some anime slop and because you come across as someone who is terminally online and I think you just proved me right
>>18499096that's obviously not the same person, idiot
>>18499101Alright asshole fine, there are at least two terminally online autists in this thread in that case
>>18499104>terminally onlineyou post on 4chan too...
>>18499117Correcto, I also just got back from a 20 mile bike ride, I'm still a cyclistchad after all
>>18499096I am not either of those anons but they are both right and (You) are wrong. Contemporary liberal American disdain for the 50s stems from resentment against a prosperous White America. As if it was a refutation to diverse America in which the people feel poorer and less empowered.White America being functional and prosperous on its own with non-Whites neither wanted or needed there is a refutation of the modern liberal worldview.Your attempt to handwave away reality only proves you know you're wrong.
>>18499118>Correcto, I also just got back from a 20 mile bike ride
>>18498791>e-everything I dislike is AI>p-people didn't have families vack then, i-it's all AIUnbelievable cope
>>18499122I don't think liberals argue that an all-white country can function and thrive on its own, they just don't think race is a factor at all. Also, blacks made up 10% of the US population in 1951, which is only marginally lower than the total black population is today, so I don't think race is even relevant in this particular instance. >>18499124Redditards hate based suburbs though
>>18499132the black population was more like 15-20% back then, it was proportionately higher. blacks had a lot bigger families back then after all.
>>18499145Fact check on that came back negative hoss
Because it was the first generation with TV so everyone is programmed to accept it as "perfect". As soon as you realize that the magical 1950s never existed, you realize that America is fundamentally unworkable as a nation and the good guys lost world war 2.
>>18499223>Because it was the first generation with TV so everyone is programmed to accept it as "perfect". As soon as you realize that the magical 1950s never existed, you realize that America is fundamentally unworkable as a nation and the good guys lost world war 2.
>>18499223>silent gen ww2 vets in the 1950s fled cities the moment one (1) nigger showed up, leaving millennial hipster coffee shops to recover a small fraction of america's urban greatness through gentrification half a century latermaybe boomers weren't the worst generation
>>18499223>the magical 1950s never existed,Blah blah nobody ever had a house nobody ever had a gf nobody ever had sex nobody ever lived without constant suicidal ideation
>>18499225crap reaction image, what does this even convey
>>18499233You're replying to an Indian.
>>18499239hope they pay him enough per (you) to get some buttered e-coli stew from the local street vendor
>>18499132It is more so the fact that diversity has real and apparent costs yet no apparent benefits.The 1950s are a refutation of modern America because the liberal open society was sold as a benefit, with trade offs but was mostly beneficial, this turned out to be a complete and total deception waged against the Americans.
>losers now would be losers thenWhy is this myth so prevalent?Spending power was stronger back then.Communal bonds were more prominent.Couple formation was much higher.Young house buyers were more common.People were generally better off and it took generally far less effort to succeed.These arent individualized social problems, thought they manifest in social life, they are problems with technology and politics and culture. These problems are collective in nature and must be solved collectively.This "works for me" gaslighting that boomers do, this doesnt work when 90% of people are experiencing the same phenomena.
Reject 50sReturn to 70s
>>18499288Look up any boomer serial killer and nearly all of them had sex, they had wives, some even had kids. It was basically almost impossible to be a "loser" back then, now it's the norm.
>>18499288>losers now would be losers then>Why is this myth so prevalent?plebbit pseuds love to explain politics through psychology. "guy I don't like = evil meanie loser" is much easier than trying to understand it in terms of systems, it also shields the dominant ideology by handwaving every grievance as a personal failing and creating a stigma around raising criticism
>>18499296Even literal homosexuals were married to women which is crazy. Just the concept of lavender marriages is insane because it means they somehow managed to attract and keep women without even being attracted to them.If you lived before the Internet it's like society immediately handed you a wife.
Tralalalalashala bamba
>>18499296it was impossible to be a loser up till about the early 90s. Then the sub4s got cut out. Normies drift along until about 2008 and then they got cut out. And now even high tier normies are getting cut out of the dating market.
>>18499296serial killers are usually dark triad chads, same reason why convicted criminals have higher fertility rates than people that have never been to prison
>>18498965>People like Richard Spencer and Andrew TateControlled opposition and a Muslim convert?
>>18499131it's fucking ai you moron, look at the kids and their clothes vanishing into their mother's skirt, the fucked up shadows, the uneven roof. for fucks sake stop being a brown subhuman for once.
>>18499558So true, families were never a thing
>>18499317>It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World is a 1963 American Technicolor epic comedy film in Ultra Panavision 70 produced and directed by Stanley Kramer>Kramer was born in New York City. His parents were Jewish
>>18497976>why does this decade trigger people so much?The thing it's supposed to represent is bald-faced lie and most of today's problems are downstream from that lie. People are sick of you retards because you keep adding insult to injury.
>>18497991France too? They were pretty busy with colonial wars
>>18499586i don't know what you're trying to imply here but i ain't gonna play your dumb games no more, you stupid faggot.
>>18499296>uglyCharly mogs
>>18498687Get rid of the cultural enrichers first.
>>18498050Just give him this.
>>18499651But, anon, that is antisemitism!
>>18497976It triggers degens.
>>18498221>travel back in time to the 1900s and give people cellphones and not a single person would be able to figure out how to use themThis is not true.
should settle the argument about the OP pic being AIslop
"The whole decade was one big bland mashed potato sandwich. The '50s were Nixon looking like a used car salesman and Eisenhower standing around looking fatherly."-- Dr. Demento
>>18497976Communist sour grapes
>>18498163>my grandma spent the 50s harvesting tomatoes in the hot sun all day while also caring for four kidsModern women (the last 3 generations) are so lazy and entitled that they think cooking and cleaning for 4 kids, doing all the housework, and managing a tomato garden (like a cumulative 12 hour job, THE ENTIRE YEAR); is ridiculously hard work. Note that the man is generally expected to do the yard work, women just have the light duty work within the house, for the most part.They had it super easy. That would just be the equivalent of less than a part time job in labor hours.... and it's not like it's hard work to wait on oven meals to cook. But I guess the housewife life seems like hell to a modern progressive woman who literally has NEVER had to work, even if they've had a job (the bar at any job is much much lower for women, particularly young pretty women).Young women have leveraged the fact that they have a pussy to expect ZERO expectations in life and they think a life that has ANY expectations of them is ridiculously hard.
>>18499825And what do you do, anon?
>>18497976Because racism.
>>18499835>What do you do anon?Why? So you can set up your ad hominem attack?A lot of physically hard work. A jack of all trades mechanic for the most part. I'm not gonna give any more info than that, I don't like identifying myself online anymore than I have to.
>>18499825In fact the 50s kind of ruined things for women because advancing technology meant they had less housework to do than in earlier times and became increasingly bored and angsty.
>>18497976Nice slop image you dumb shit
>>18499707Yes, communists are definitely jealous of you playing dolls with AI-generated pictures of families.
>>18499586Not that anon but families existing (something that I somehow don't think anyone has disputed) has no bearing on you being a retard who's fallen for AI slop.
>>18497976Not a leftist but chuds overly fantasize and glorify that decade too much. Nothing new since they view history in a "black and white" lens. Expecting any form of nuance from chuds is mentally retarded.
>>18497981I hate that song. They put it in a commercial so I kept hearing it. Early life checked the writer. Every time.
>>18499316You couldn't even complain about your food to your QT wife now without getting yelled at that you should make it yourself.Feminism+Birth Control+Mass Immigration. Crazy how fast a civilization can fall apart.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY7-usB4eDs
>>18499316Closeted homosexuals are more attractive in the female gaze. Not the straight up faggy fag type of Homosexual
>>18499951It's a homosexual's casual indifference, that makes them more attractive to women. To women, any man worth having is aloof.
>>18499963Closeted homosexuals tend to be more sexist, racist all the buzzword -ists that there are. Faggy homosexuals are more outgoing and usually friends with females.
>>18499697>>18499880AI is the future. Get over it, luddites.
>>18499902Who cares if the image is AI? Plenty of family portraits exist
>>18499973A lot of wishful thinking there
>>18499946>catty gay man has hissy fit for comedic effect >RETVRN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXfuQqkwa5Iyou'd never see these corny American History 101 tunes on Top 40 anymore
>>18500139No because that was before media were worried about sucking up to Ellis Islanders who wouldn't be here for many decades when the events in the song happened.
>>18499925Being 90% white with nogs in their Southern containment zones is good enough already
>>18499946>Crazy how fast a civilization can fall apart.Yeah but at least we have porn, vidya and weed now
>>18497987>you can only date someone of the same race/religious denomination/socioeconomic tier as yourselfMy mom didn't know for decades that her parents marriage was a scandalous elope when it happened because of the denominational difference.
>>18500788My grandparents were Lutheran and Catholic. They married in the latter church but the priest would only do the wedding in the foyer and not in the church itself.
>>18499882They're not jealous of me. They are jealous of the family. They look at a picture of a happy family and make up homosexuals and women with unfulfilled career ambitions. In reality they are just hostile to the kind of people in the picture. In their eyes not everyone can have it so no one can have it.
>>18497976Ah yes thanks for the coca cola ad. Now lets talk about how it was mandatory to marry a spastic incel who makes your life miserable and passing on their spastic incel genes. The artificial scarcity of today exists only because incels want the same model before a sudden artificial "economic boom" happens. No thanks.t. Male
>>18500712They would spank their fannies, like this, it was nothing serious.
>>18500923what's choncho yapping about here
>>18497976a miserable time to be a woman>domestic abuse not even taken seriously>no contraception or abortion>divorce hard to get and shameful>marital rape was legal
>>18497976>he had to shit out some AI generated slop instead of going through the trouble of actually findings photo from the 50sNot off to a good start here.>>18499651America was never pedestrian friendly even when it was majority White. What a retarded parroted line that shifts blame away from the car lobby who invested money into the infrastructure and places it all on le heckin' niggerinos!!!1!1!>>18499294Wtf is this real? You can get a flat screen 55" today for around $180. The 70s must've felt apocalyptic
>>18497976They are paid shills who try to denigrate the peak of American Dream, when one income could support a whole family and more.
>>18500880Yes, of course. Leftists hate families. Leftists go to malls and if they see couples with children, they start yelling at them while foaming at the mouth. Leftists don't have families either btw, they just spontaneously burst into existence or are conjured into existence at a leftist assembly.But what angers leftists the most are families generated by AI from the prompt typed in by a socially inept weirdo with a Roman statue pfp.
>>18501133if you Google Image search "50s family" it's literally the first image that comes up
>>18501087Why has this board become so reddit lately?
>>18497976if that's an AI image it fooled me it really looked like a photograph
>>18501188It looks like shit. The kid is literally missing her left arm.
>>18497987>/pol/ would hate living in the 50s crazy. anyway this is the /his/ board.
>/pol/ would hate living in the 50s and they wouldn't get laid then anymore than now.
>>18501145Trump won the married vote by double digits. Harris won the unmarried vote by double digits.
>>18501145There are plenty of examples of large white families being posted online and leftists hyperventilating in response lol
>>18498168the '50s were the beatnik decade?
>>18501243true, but the overlap is almost complete by now.
>>18501133>America was never pedestrian friendly even when it was majority White. What a retarded parroted line that shifts blame away from the car lobby who invested money into the infrastructure and places it all on le heckin' niggerinos!!!1!1!Odd thing to say given America exists longer than the automobile
>>18501087>women only discovered happiness after the pill and roe v. wade I can't begin to describe how depraved and anti-human this outlook is
>>18501087Again, DV is overwhelmingly not a problem for middle class people--third wave feminism psy-oped middle class women into thinking they were all at risk when it's almost entirely done by trashy people.
>>18501766It was the second wave. Third-wave is about the intersectional diversity shit
>>18497987>>18501243>>18501523>you'd hate the 1950s, trustWhat would I hate about it? The hard work and self-discipline? I'd be raised for that, I'd value actually producing something of tangible value and working alongside other hard working men who share my values and culture instead of ghettobabble. No vidya and porn? 1950s men had countless hobbies and weren't shamed as "nerds" for it. Married men have more sex. A negligible level of lead and asbestos? Petty inconveniences compared to the existential horror of the modern world. We are not even more prosperous, it is almost impossible to pay off a home before 30 while raising a family unless you are IQ 120+ and had a tiger mom who prepped you for college by getting you into all the right extracurriculars starting when you were 8.Is it really far fetched that we could have the high trust communities, high IQ WASP culture and low crime of the 1950s AND modern technology? Do you people have zero imagination? At least progress the debate a little instead of this twitter-tier gaslighting, but of course you don't want to, you have nothing else after that.We were sold a lie and you hate the fact we are now realizing it. You couldn't bury it. The overton window stopped shifting to the left, albeit via Israel shill Trump, even the psyops accept this reality now. It should have stopped in the 1980s when everyone saw the ghettos and birthrates dropped below replacement, but I guess the end of the cold war and a brief period of prosperity nixed that and everyone voted for Clinton instead of another "Reagan". But now the great realization is finally happening in real time. We are not like boomers who can just move to the sterile 'burbs and insulate from reality. We now lack the material wealth for that, it has to go to your precious migrants while the internet and electronic distractions just allow us to become better informed. It's all falling apart. You just couldn't bury it!
>>18498221Have you ever used a loom befor?There's hardware that's complicated like basic coding back then. Look at traditional lace making and the traditional weaving processes. My 3 year old neice could open my phones lock screen and use the apps just from observing me for a day. I think it's just an easy UI. Let me go a step further. Indians and Africans can use phones.
>>18501853>Married men have more sexwell yes, you could just make the secretary at work fuck you since sexual harassment wasn't really understood as a thing yet
>>18497976eisenhower era, which just mean trump/likud era, in fact eisenhower was the first likud backed president after ww2, then nixon, reagan then trump, so naturally leftist who supported jewish labor bund socialist marxist hate likud and eisenhower, its all so tiresome
>>18502026>in fact eisenhower was the first likud backed president after ww2That's crazy considering Likud didn't exist until the 1970's
>>18501853why did you address me (>>18501523) with this screed is a complete mystery.
