How do the British feel about themselves all dying because they didn't let Hitler save them during ww2?
>saveDidn't Hitler have a seething hatred of Anglos? I don't think there's any timeline where he would've saved Britain. He'd be harsher on Britain than he was on France I think.
>>18499106How do the British feel about themselves all dying because they didn't let the Spanish Armada save them during 1588?
>>18499106Britain was always doomed to get conquered and genocided by America. Hitler wouldn't have been able to save them even if he wanted to
Hitler didn't actually care about England one way or the other, and just wanted them to buzz off and mind their own business.The English choosing to become an American satellite and import infinite pakis was their own decision they were perfectly free to make
>>18499106Save them from what? The English WANTED to become an American vassal. The problem was they wanted to turn Europe into American vassals as well. That was the unacceptable premise which the Western front was fought over
>>18499110No.
>>18499106England knew they had no hope of competing with the US, so they simply gave upYou can't save someone who's unwilling to be saved
>This war will have helped to originate one of the world's great upheavals. It will have consequences that we did not seek—for example, the dismemberment of the British Empire. Who are the guilty parties? The Jews. What happens to England is totally indifferent to them. A Hore-Belisha, who grew up in the ghetto, couldn't have the same reflexes as an Englishman. Experience teaches us that after every catastrophe a scapegoat is found. In England, it will probably be the Jew. But let them settle that between themselves. It's not our mission to settle the Jewish question in other people's countries!
>>18499161>was their own decision they were perfectly free to makeand yet they voted against it every time and it still happened.
>>18499164>Save them from what?from being destroyed, obviously. Hitler claimed that a european ethnostate was necessary to ensure another thousand years of their existence, and because it was not created, they are being destroyed.
>>18500936>Hitler claimed that a european ethnostate was necessary to ensure another thousand years of their existence>europeanYou mean German.
Regular reminder that the UK was 94% white as of the 1991 census. All subsequent demographic changes are due to the policies of Blair, Cameron and Johnson, not a war than ended 50-80 years earlier.
>>18499157>genocided by AmericaThe hell you mean by that?
>>18499106Fascists are corporatist and will eventually face a tension between what benefits the nation and what benefits industry. This same tension will reproduce mass migration. It's only a matter of time.Fascism just puts off the issue a generation or two until nationalist fervor wanes. You haven't solved anything until you defeat Capitalism.
>>18501475They went with Aryan to define their in-group, which is synonymous with white.
>>18501556can't have infinity brown/black people if you make an ethnostate which excludes them like hitler wanted, and eurpoeans are all dying now because they didn't allow one to be created
>>18501570How are Europeans all dying now?
>>18501570Hitler literally imported foreigners for labor tho>but they were white!only because he failed to conquer any sources of browns, they were often from white subgroups Nazi ideology considered inferior
>>18501571introducing non whites into white habitats without strict rules forbidding their mixing can only end in the destruction of the native white population>>18501572there is no reason to believe hitler would have imported black/brown people to be slaves
>>18501571not one euro country with a birthrate anywhere close to 2.1 and they all import massive amount of foreigners
>>18501576How does that mean Europeans are dying?
>>18501575No ones forcing whites to intermix with non whites its just coming naturally
>>18501578Cause at the current rate they'll all be minorities in their own countries in at most 4 decades and within like 2 centuries their populations will be so small that they won't even be statistically significant.Ergo, they are dying.
>>18501570You can because the ethnic restrictions will change over time to suit economic needs. There's no reason to believe a fascist state will be unique or spared this general trend because fascism doesn't challenge the fundamental cause. Worse, fascists tend to misidentify the causes of mass migration.
>>18501579And such wouldn't be possible if they weren't permitted to exist within the same territorial ranges, that is how you ensure the preservation of distinct phenotypes. There is also the argument to be made that they are not mixing, not in meaningful numbers anyways, and that the sheer volume of imported blacks/browns is just a pure population replacement.
>>18501580Not having children is not the same as dying. I know you can't breed, but no need to let your incel rage cloud your judgement.
>>18501583>Not having children is not the same as dyingHow exactly is a population not dying out if they aren't having children? Explain that to me, please.
>>18501581there is no compelling economic argument for the importation of blacks/browns under any circumstances, its all nonsense post-hock rationalizations for genocide
>>18499106British Dead in Europe:>230,000German dead in Europe:>5,000,000Russian deaths:>Up to Ten million Feel pretty gud about it Tbh
>>18501575In the final year of the war, Hitler set up a mandatory breeding program between Slavic men and German women. Like the interracial breeding grounds meme but in real life.
>>18501586You don't find the reasons compelling because you preference ethnic preservation over the economy. This is just a self-report of your own values.
>>18501584You said dying. Not dying out. Have a wank and clear your head.
>>18501591I didn't because I wasn't the original poster to begin with. But do you not understand the difference between an individual dying and a population dying? For example if at the current rates the white british population won't even be statistically significant by 2100, how are they not dying?
>>18501594Noone is killing them.
>>18501595So you agree they're dying?
>>18501594why do you believe these estimates? It's just gonna be the usual increasing foreign population -> xenophobic backlash -> immigration restrictionism cycle and will level off instead of continuing into infinityLabour's moved well to the right on immigration and Reform's probably gonna form the next government
>>18501599Cause there's no sign of immigration going down or native birthrates significantly going up. Pretty simple, honestly. I remember your gayass argument being used for why Canada will never become a white minority country in the very early 2010's. Nobody is making that argument anymore.
>>18501596I said literally the opposite.
>>18501603You said they aren't being murdered. I asked if you think they are dying.
>>18501590if for whatever reason you think your population needs infinity growth (none truly do) then there are much saner ways to go about it than the destruction of your native population through the importation of browns/blacksI reject your unsupportable belief that importing blacks/browns in a foregone and inevitable solution to the desire for economic growth
>>18501594What do you think is happening to the white populations in this image? You think they are just dissapearing? They're moving out of places like blackburn and luton because they are shitholes and moving into different towns. That list besides Manchester and London reads as a list of the biggest top tier shitholes that people only lived in because of industry that now no longer exists. Even in the worst scenario regarding white british demographics there will still always be tens of millions of white Brits
>>18501582If I put a woman in a room with a vanilla cake and a chocolate cake, and she chooses the chocolate cake, does that mean she was forced to choose the chocolate cake?
>>18501606No, because noone is killing them.>>18501617T
>>18501617They did charge interest tho?
>>18501620Do you not understand what a below replacement birthrate means? It means the population is aging out and contracting. Ergo, given enough time that population will become statistically insignificant. >>18501622So a person can only die if another person is killing them? Otherwise they are immortal? kek
>>18501621If you care about preserving the ethnic character of your nationality, then it is undesirable to allow such a choice in the first place.And like I said, the "mixing" is not happening in meaningful amounts, the populations are being replaced/displaced
>>18501625>They did charge interest tho?
>>18501556>Fascists are corporatist and will eventually face a tension between what benefits the nation and what benefits industry.Where did you get that idea from?Fascism is the the ideology of:>All within the state>Nothing outside the state>Nothing AGAINST the state Industrial interests are subordinated to the state.
>>18501569Yet they murdered millions of white people, even excluding Jews.
>>18499161Hitler believed England was ruled by Jews, just like Russia and America.Hitler's goal was the destruction of Jewry.Conflict would have been inevitable.Moron
>>18501600Canada never developed an immigration restrictionist mass party, let alone two of them judging by Starmer's Labour. (though is that still really a "mass party" lel?)Bernier's People's Party was a sad joke and the mainstream Conservatives remained pro-immigration.This differs radically from Britain's political situation. There's more than just a sign of immigration to Britain going down in the near future, it's practically a blaring alarm at this point.
>>18501570>because they didn't allow one to be created>>18501499
>>18499106The krauts were dying; the Brits were stomping on them.
>>18499106Sorry Kraut, Slavs are just better. We don't make the rules.
>>18501676>>18501669The fact remains... it they'd have let hitler save them then they wouldn't be dying today.
>>18501683Poo land is becoming brown too, hitler would have saved them.
>>18501685Poland solved immigration.
>>18501685>hitler would have saved them.Hitler was trying to wipe them from existence.
>>18501691By importing infinity brown/black people, destroying themselves.
>>18501692If they'd become allies of Germany then the British people wouldn't be getting destroyed now
>>18501696Poles shoot illegal immigrants, why don't you do that in Germany?
>>18501699Ah yes become allies with the faggots that deem you sub-human. Sorry retard unlike you not everyone has a cuck fetish.
>>18501684That is an assumption Not a fact.
>>18501699Hitler was a bad ally.Hitler was also allies with the Soviet Union and invaded them anyways.Because he believed the Soviet Union was ruled by Jews.He believed the same about Britain.
>>18501705Hitler was doing God's work by driving Satan's synagogue from Christian lands, and non jews had nothing to fear from that.
>>18501701Poolanders are importing infinity browns/blacks just like the rest of europe, being destroyed. Hitler would have saved them with his plan to make europe a European ethnostate. >>18501703White brits were considered Aryan by the nazi definition, obviously.
>>18501650>Industrial interests are subordinated to the state.The relationship isn't one-directional. The state also draws support from its industries. The state therefore has incentives to empower its industries, hence the link between fascist regimes and big business in the past. The fundamental driver of mass migration is big business, so the source of this problem hasn't been addressed by fascism.We have historic examples of this under fascist regimes. Poles were mass recruited for work in Germany to help with labor shortages and to prevent bringing German women back to the workforce. Slavs were already seen as an inferior people, so why not groups from further east or from further south? Especially years after Hitler, once the initial wave of nationalist fervor has died down.
>>18501633>a gook cartoonist said it so that's what happened
>>18501716>Poolanders are importing infinity browns/blacks just like the rest of europe, being destroyed. Hitler would have saved them with his plan to make europe a European ethnostate.Poland has one of the lowest immigration rates in Europe, in fact the opposite is happening poleGODS are immigrating outside into west Europe and the UK. Soon after all the browns will be kicked out. The Poles will be the only ones left. Europe will soon become a Polish/slavic ethnostate and you can do nothing about it. Hitler was a tranny cuck that'd get trampled by the might of Slavic Bvlls one way or another.
>>18501731Lowest isn't zero and a torrent is hardly less than a flood. Poolanders are being destroyed like sll europeans because they didnt join with Hitler to ensure their survival.
>>18501684Based on what?There's simply no convincing argument that a country which experienced a fascist period would simply remain nationalistic and anti-migrant forever. Francoist Spain had a very low migration which has massively increased since the late 1990s for a direct counterexample. >Following a decline during the economic crisis, immigration began to rise again after 2015, with a marked acceleration after 2021, with the foreign-born population now reaching 20.3% of the total population as of January 2025.[2]If you want to consider non-fascist countries with race laws, then look at Australia. The Australian Immigration Restriction Act 1901 was intended to keep out non-whites from the country as part of the White Australia Policy. The policy progressively weakened over time until the Act was ultimately repealed in 1959.The clear trend of history is that race laws struggle to be maintained in the long-term where the economic concerns of the bourgeois capitalist class win out.
>>18501737>Lowest isn't zeroStill not at replacement rate and its all that matters. Sorry your Kraut psyop won't work here you're a faggot just like hitler whose entire purpose in life is to get trampled by the might of slavGods
>>18501726>The relationship isn't one-directional. Except it kind of is though?? Industrialists who didn't toe the party line were like to either have their businessess entirely nationalized or be replaced by someone who would (same thing).>We have historic examples of this under fascist regimes. .None of those are the industrialists doing. They were done under the state's allowance. Had they not agreed to it, it wouldn't have happened.You're mistaking the pragmatic hypocrisy of fascism as intrinsic aspect of it.
>>18501758>Still not at replacement rateEven if its only a nominal percentage per year, over decades there will be no pool poolanders left in pooland. Those lands will be brown lands, and there will be nothing left of your people.
>>18501710>non jews had nothing to fear from that.
>>18501767>Those lands will be brown lands, and there will be nothing left of your people.Your lands will be Slavic lands. There's nothing you can do.
>>18501759>None of those are the industrialists doingThat doesn't matter; mass migration is still occurring. My point is that the fascist state pursues policies for the benefit of its 'national economy' (i.e. its industrialists) which includes mass migration. >Had they not agreed to it, it wouldn't have happenedBut they did agree to it because they experience the same economic pressures as any other capitalist country which responds to labor shortages through migration.
>>18499106Did he intend to save the British like he saved the Germans? kek>>18501683
>>18499164>The English WANTED to become an American vassalThat's not true. The British wanted to drag the Americans into the war as a tool to ultimately maintain their position of advantage over a fragmented continental Europe. Only after the Suez Crisis they realized that their geopolitical influence had vanished and that they had been reduced to a powerless vassal state.
>>18499106I am pretty sure that he could have helped the British by just not starting the World War. kek
>>18501784>the fascist state pursues policies for the benefit of its 'national economy' (i.e. its industrialists)You keep conflating these two.
>>18501731Poland is only behind the trend in Europe because were the last to liberalize.East Germany is also receiving less immigrants than West Germany.But the trends continue to increase, Poland will suffer the fate of the rest of Europe, it will do so at a later date, which also means if the rest of Europe changes and comes under native rule again, Poland will also do so, but Poland will be the last to do so and put them at a disadvantage.Slavs will jeer and cheer over being liberalized last, but not understand this also means far-right Western Europeans will be on the other side of liberalism while Slavs are still in the weak cuck stage of "maybe liberalism can work lets keep going".
>>18501834To ensure the continuing existence of all Aryan peoples (whites) the whole of europe must become a sanctuary reserved exclusively for their own kind. The consequences of having failed to establish that condition already is why all European people are now being destroyed.
>>18501569>They went with Aryan to define their in-group, which is synonymous with white.No, it's synonymous with "whoever allies with us" and led to retardation like pretending Croats and Serbs are totally separate races.
>>18501939No, it does effectively mean whites. For all intents and purposes, whites and aryans are synonyms.
>>18501942Hitler murdered millions of Aryans.
>>18501962Americand and Russians suiciding themselves into the german meat grinder instead of joining the cause was a choice, a stupid choice which doomed their race.
>>18501965Discounting soldiers, the Nazis still murdered millions of Aryans and planned on doing more.
>>18501942>No, it does effectively mean whitesOK but what if I have a brain and thus can't pretend that there's a meaningful racial distinction between Croats and Serbs like the nazis did?
>>18501927The world doesn't work like that. Poles still have autonomy over their choice to "import" or "not import" the shitskins. Meanwhile the rest of Europe doesn't have a choice. Its either do or die for them but Slavs still have the agency.
>>18501965Shitler wanted to genocide the Slavs. He actively put non-Jewish Poles into camps. Why would we ally with him?
>>18501978Driving Satan's synagogue from Christian lands is good though.
>>18501985Pooland made their choice, they are importing browns and blacks, they are being destroyed.
>>18501989Is there really any meaningful difference between a jew and a communist militant?
>>18501993Slavs will win regardless.
>>18501996Slavs won't exist because instead of siding with Hitler they import browns and blacks.
>>18501998Kraut psyop, we all know what Shitler though about the Slavs. What does "Living space" mean huh?
>>18501995Yeah communist militants such as Hitler killed Jews, hence why he allied with his communist militant buddies in the USSR to invade anticommunist Poland.
