[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 33790362.png (109 KB, 432x221)
109 KB PNG
We really shouldn't be using the same term to describe modern Rabbinic Jews as their ancient counterparts, who I believe we should refer to as Judeans for clarity. One group was most-or-less racially homogeneous, the other heterogeneous. One was localized, the other global. Culture and religious practice varied substantially as well. Equating the two groups would be like saying a random South American is a conquistador, a random Sardinian a citizen of Ancient Rome, a random Chinese is a Mongolian steppe-dweller, etc.
>>
>>18499237
We're really playing this stupid wordgame? I suppose that by your logic we should call the Ancient Greeks Grecians because the they had less Slavic admixture and followed a different religion.
>>
>>18499787
>I suppose that by your logic we should call the Ancient Greeks Grecians
No. By my logic, equating ancient Judeans with modern Jews would be like saying modern Croatians are in fact the direct descendants and the same group as Ancient Greeks.
>>
>>18499787
Also, using the prefix "Ancient" denotes a degree of separation typically omitted for some reason when talking about Jews.
>>
>>18500816
>By my logic, equating ancient Judeans with modern Jews would be like saying modern Croatians are in fact the direct descendants and the same group as Ancient Greeks.
Imagine thinking that modern Jews are this divorced from ancient Jews.
>>
>>18500836
Imagine pretending they're not.
>>
>>18499237
so true my kekistani brother, we are charlie kirk reeeee
>>
>>18499237
The Bible clarifies this, those that did not accept the divinity of the risen Christ are satan's synagogue.
>>
>>18501037
Nope, he a glowie faggot, just like Trump. Next.
>>
>>18499237


THEY ARE JUDAISTS; JUDAISM WAS FOUNDED IN THE MIDDLE AGES; BEFORE THEN, THERE WERE MOSAIC SECTS.

«JEWISH» IS AN ETHNONYM; NOT ALL JEWS ARE JUDAISTS.
>>
I guess they don't carry the stain of killing Jesus then
>>
>>18501261
>implying that such a thing is conferred over strictly biological lines, not a ship-of-theseus continuity and clinging to the identity of "israelite" while denying the teleological purpose and fulfillment of that group
>>
>>18499237
Agreed. And for that reason we should not blame modern "Jews" for the death of Christ, as they are totally different people to the Jews who did that.
>>
>>18501359
See >>18501355
>>
>>18501355
If they carry a ship of Theseus continuity then that also means that Israel is their ancestral home and their birthright. Time to pack up and go back to Arabia Mohammed :)
>>
>>18501361
>If they carry a ship of Theseus continuity then that also means that Israel is their ancestral home and their birthright.
It certainly does not mean this. Is a Peruvian's ancestral home and birthright Spain?
>>
>>18501363
You said it yourself, they're a ship of Theseus. And the original ship came from whence?
>>
>>18501367
Why does that confer entitlement? I am a Burger. Does that confer a "birthright" for me to take over my country of origin and remove the people there by force? Even if I really really identify myself with a particular nationality?
>>
>>18501369
If it does not confer entitlement to Israel then it does not confer guilt for killing Christ.
>>
>>18499237
>modern Rabbinic Jews
I agree but I would add that call them jews at all makes no sense.
As they are neither theologically, culturally or genetically related to anyone in biblical times, they are basicly a weird khazar/Arab mix.
>>
>>18499787
Stupid analogy, desu.
>>
>>18500836
>that modern Jews are this divorced from ancient Jews.
They absolutely are.
The people who call themselves jews today lived in Europe for centuries before the Brits decided to give them Palestine.
>>
>>18501418
So they have nothing to do with killing Christ, got it!
>>
>>18501421
They are theologically connected to the people who allegedly did in the Bible (the pharisees).
Anyhow, I don't even think Christ ever truly existed, so I don't really care.
My main gripe with jews is their habit of infiltrating institutions and using them to advance their interests.
>>
>>18501426
Then they are also theologically connected to the original Jews and hence Israel is their homeland and birthright.
>>
>>18501411
>>18501431
Re-read >>18501355 and >>18501369
>>[the guilt for killing christ is conferred via] a clinging to the identity of "israelite" while denying the teleological purpose and fulfillment of that group
Quit being dishonest and misrepresenting what was said. Even if we drop the question of blame for killing Christ, and assume, for the sake of argument, a perfect identity with modern and ancient groups, that in no way gives a "birthright" to the region of Palestine. That would be like an Irish American deciding that Ireland actually belongs to his own people, and deciding he is entitled to killing and stealing from the people who currently live there. It is a sociopathic, criminal mindset. I can assure you you're not helping your peoples' image.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.