[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sddefault.jpg (58 KB, 640x480)
58 KB JPG
Why did the Iron Age Iranians mix so much with various Asian peoples? The nomadic Iranians, for example, mixed significantly with Asian peoples, particularly the Sakas.

The same is true for Sogdians and Bactrians, etc.
>>
WMAF wins.
>>
>>18499329
?
>>
>>18499328
I think someone posted an article that talked about how the population of Iranians in the Bronze Age was small, or something like that, and there was an incredible lack of foids for them.
>>
File: 20260528_013527.jpg (310 KB, 1080x1620)
310 KB JPG
>>18499328
All dna studies show that Turkics carry major Saka ancestry.
>Persians
Elamites who larped as Aryan
>>
>>18499344
We wuz
The Scythians, for example, were not Hapas, and furthermore, the Sakas were not a kind of proto-Scythian homeland as some like to say, and your own graph shows heterogeneity even among cataloged samples such as Sakas.
>>
>>18499349
Most of the oldest Scythian samples have significant east Eurasian admixture
>>
I’m not saying Scythians were Turkic nor am I saying they were full east Eurasian originally What I am saying is that the oldest samples of Scythians all appear more east and have APS like East Eurasian admixture autosomally, paternally and maternally.

Which means they were originally a union of Andronovo and Glazkovo east Eurasian element, they most probably spoke IE languages but they weren’t full “aryans” and they had genes that modern Eurolosers don’t
>>
>>18499356
>Haplogroup Q is East Eurasian

It's less Eastern than haplo R. Glazkovo culture carried 20% North Eurasian admixture.
>>
konnichiwa dude!
>>
>>18499445
Not true
>>
>>18499328
Do we have samples of the Bactrians? In the case of the Sogdians, aren't the sample sizes quite small? And where are the Wusun and Tagar on your map?
>>
>>18499328
I believe he is correct. >>18499337
But it's strange because some "sakas" can have even less than 30% steppe
>>
File: 20260528_111901.jpg (174 KB, 1170x1495)
174 KB JPG
>>18499356
>were full east asian
Some of the Scythian samples in this dataset very closely resemble Mordovians. And tell me, which culture do you believe to be the proto- Scythian who wuz fullz asiaticz? Also This is for you:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=i1u088MlOmI&si=hSE1zZPiEfFlB7ql
>>
>>18499918
>shitty coverage
>Moksha
>eyza
LMAO you just proved me right. Thank you, saar
>>
>>18499927
They looked like Mordovians
>>
>>18499937
Not true.
Many samples cluster within uralic pops which in turn, have east asian ancestry. Just like your own pic shows here>>18499918
Eryza and Moksha aren't fully euro pops, the OG Scythians came from Kazakhstan, maybe tasmola or Karasuk, both with the glorious east asian ancestry.
>>
>>18499899
No. Small sample size less than 10 samples
>>
File: 20260528_013514.png (40 KB, 404x531)
40 KB PNG
Eurosaars?
>>
>>18499992
Bashkirs and Tatars are part of the Russian World and therefore whiter than west europeans.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.