why is faggotry inneherently disgusting to a normal man?we know Plato called it crime against nature, Aristotle called it a habit born out of abuse, in athen it was punishable by death, roman military would beat faggots with sticks if they were found.Kant put it just one level above bestiality, when you look at faggots you want to stone them to death.why is that?
>>18501029In the Laws, Plato says that most Greeks consider homosexuality acceptable and that establishing a law against homosexuality will be exceptionally difficult. In another writing, the Phaedrus, he places homosexual lovers on top of his hierarchy of human souls - those who do not have sex being the highest, but those who ‘lapse’ a few times because of their passion for one another being second best, better even than priests, kings, warriors, philosophers.Aristotle was talking about adults who enjoyed being passive recipients of anal sex. He wrote elsewhere that homosexuality was an intentional policy design and spoke about the dynamics of homosexuality neutrally or positively.It was obviously not punishable by death in Athens. There is no source for this claim.
>>18501029Sex in general is pretty fucking disgusting, it's just that we're wired to ignore the disgust when we're aroused. That's why post nut clarity tends to lower the perception of whatever we've fucked.You feel no arousal from men, and homosex is actually even more disgusting than normal sex, so of course you're revolted by it.
>>18501035faggotThere is evidence that homosexual sex, or kinaidia, was outlawed in Classical Athens. Aristophanes Knights says a man called Gryttus was eliminated,[60] and the scholiast to the line tells us that Gryttus was put to death.[61] There is also philological evidence that one of the charges against Socrates was his sexual corruption of young men.[62] Harry Tanner's The Queer Thing About Sin[63] explores further evidence for homophobia in ancient Greece and Rome and ties it societal crises.
>>18501035I am so tired of subhuman parasite hives like you having rights.
>>18501046>>18501043>>18501029You seem really interested in this lol
>>18501043Nice source. Did you read the rest of the Wiki article you’re quoting? Meanwhile Plato describes Aristophanes as making some argument praising homos as superior men:>In youth and young manhood this sort of male is the best because he is by nature the most manly. Some people say such males are without shame, but that is not true. They do what they do not out of shamelessness but out of confidence, courage and manliness, and they embrace that which is like themselves. And there is good evidence for this in the fact that only males of this type, when they are grown up, prove to be the real men in politics.Aristophanes (Symposium 191e-192c)He also depicts characters like Heracles and Dionysus as being pederasts and says “the pit-assed” constitute the majority of men in Athens.>>18501046What’s the problem? It’s just objective truth. You don’t have to like the fact the Greeks were faggots. But it’s silly to deny it
>Hitler lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics. It had destroyed ancient Greece, he said. Once rife, it extended its contagious effects like an ineluctable law of nature to the best and most manly of characters, eliminating from the reproductive process those very men on whose offspring a nation depended.Rudolf Diels, Lucifer Ante PortasWhy did Hitler believe in the degenerate gay Greek myth? Was he a secret faggot?
>>18501043>the lowborn protagonist of Aristophanes' play The Knights openly admits to having been a passive partner.[59]Erm, what the flip
>>18501029Spreads disease and is associated with other degenerate behaviors. Also, fags don't breed, which was a massive issue historically. A straight man could produce many future citizens, a gay man produces zero.
>>18501029Jeet, nigger, muzzie or latinxcrement threadHomophobia = shitskincoded
Why did OP disappear?
>>18501029Honestly, I don’t have anything against homosexuality in principle. But anal sex is just objectively disgusting, and I don’t care if it’s between a man and a women, two men, or two women. That’s where people shit and it’s fucking gross. Unfortunately, it’s also the primary way that most gay couples do it.
>>18501165Correct. It is inherently disgusting behavior, the revulsion you feel is similar to what you might feel when witnessing a contagious disease, socially manipulative behavior, etc.
>>18501173>It is inherently disgusting behavior.That’s not what I said though. Gay couples could just not do anal. Also I imagine most lesbians aren’t having anal sex, but maybe I’m wrong. The point is that they aren’t synonymous.
>>18501178>Gay couples could just not do anal.You obviously haven't interacted with many gay people and don't understand their mindset.
>>18501179No, I get that most gay couples are having anal sex. But there are exceptions (albeit probably few).
>>18501165Hetero males are disgusting and loathsome personal hygiene and often infect the poor women that lay with these vermin with yeasts and HPV because they're incapable of washing their own micropenisesHetero males also have vomit indulcing assholes fillen with shit crusts and hair because trimming and washing that part is "gay" in their culture.Sex involving hetero males in general is inherently disgusting and vomit indulcing, I only feel bad for the poor women attracted to men, so many has hit on me and said they wished they could have me as a bf due to hetmoid general subhuman behavior, subhuman mannerisms, subhuman beliefs, and subhuman personal hygiene>>18501173>GAY SEX IS ONLY ANAL O ALGOA shitskin third worlder did this post
>>18501187Your behaviour was punishable by clubbing in ancient rome(the military)
>>18501040Then why are some men turned on by it?
When the alternative is impossible, it breeds resentment instead. Reproduction is important enough that you don't want to present non-functional alternatives to the masses. The righteous victimhood ofi dont want to finish this reply its not worth it you are all fucking faggots.
I'm not gay personally so I might be a bit off base here but isn't gay sex pretty much just masturbation but with extra steps? Like you're basically just rubbing one out and gooning on eachother without it contacting anything that resembles a compatible reproductive system right?
>>18501043>mfw the ancient Greek word for buttsex is Canada
>>18501244Canada also happens to be Spanish for "Canyon" but that's not why the country is called that, it comes from an Iroquoian local dialect word meaning "village" or "Settlement"
>>18501178>>18501179I’m gay and have zero interest in anal sex
>>18501193It won't change the fact masc gay guys are inherently superior men to hetmoid vermin
i mean, they're not making babies or anything. also, a lot of fag sex involves the anus, you know, the poophole.im sorry, i dont hate people attracted to the same sex, the culture around then just erks me.
STDs and failure to produce kids. That's really it. Note it was sodomy that was looked down on because homosexuality as identity is a recent invention
>>18501287>homosexuality as identity is a recent inventionFalse
>WHY WON'T YOU PRODUCE LARVAE AND WAGESLAVE LIKE ME FOR THEM AND WHY DO YOU HAVE SUCH EASYTIMES WHY SEX AND RELATIONS REEEHetmoid obsession with us nothing short of frustration and envy
>>18501287>STDsAbsolute majority of STD ridden countries are nigger and slavshit shitholes where queer folk are executed or heavily repressed
>>18501292We literally know the guy who invented the word homosexuality
>>18501029What is this trashpost full of lies.
>>18501029Imagine caring if two adult men or two adult women bang and date. Not my problem.
Only christkeks and juden who still have nightmares of their ancestors being sodomized by based babylonians and assyrians still give a shit about homos. You lost faggot, cry to your emaciated jew on a stick. Gay masculinity is the most powerful form of man
>>18501165>But anal sex is just objectively disgustingPorn studios produce what consumers buy, and it's no surprise that anal is one of the top demanded categories. Even if people don't do it themselves, they're interested.
>>18501029Men are disgusting. They are hairy and smell bad. Naturally the idea of fucking one of those is disgusting to most men. Women are wired differently to be attracted to non-physical attributes.
>>18501388Misandrist cuck. Males are objectively the more beautiful sex
>>18501388Hetero males are disgusting yesQueer males are often beautiful
>>18501230Mental illlness.
>>18501029Modern homosexuality is way more disgusting and degenerate than it was in history. Anal sex was actually quite uncommon for example.
>>18501165>anal sex is objectively disgustingwhats considered "disgusting" objectively becomes more "arousing". People don't think with their brains when having sex.
>>18501173People can be gay without having anal sex...what then?
>>18501713This. Pretty sure a post-WW2 survey showed it to be rare among male homosexuals, with frotting and mutual masturbation being most common. They subverted homosexuality
>>18501304Wow that really changes everything? "Gravity" wasn't a word in the stone ages does that mean fags would fly around?
>>18501719>They subverted homosexualitycouldn't be more true. The average plebian was never meant to be exposed to this stuff. Homosexuals could easily blend in and form families back in the base. It was typically reserved to the elites and the great men of history.
>>18501029There is not any other single youtube video that is responsible for more or worse historical revision.
>>18501029Read Romans 1 and 2 that should explain it.
>>18501165Homosexuality in any form is objectively morally wrong and unnatural, but there’s nothing wrong with anal sex with your wife. You inverted right and wrong you degenerate
>>18501825The prohibition in the Christian world was against sodomy, not homosexuality as such, and this included anal sex with your wife. If you had anal sex with your wife, you were liable to be killed. In healthy virile civilisations, untainted by Abrahamic morality, of course, homosexuality was revered and celebrated. The natural order of things is that a relationship between two males is best, then, next best, between man and woman, if only for the generation of the species, but hardly as a matter of spiritual edification...
>>18501029>Plato called it crime against natureYeah I'm his 80s after a lifetime lusting after hot guys. >roman military would beat faggots with sticks if they were found. source? >when you look at faggots you want to stone them to death.when I see a cute gay man, I just want to kiss him
>>18501388>Men are disgusting. They are hairy and smell bad.My boyfriend is smooth, smells lovely and takes care of himself more than most women do. I love to hold him in my arms and tickle him and kiss him.
>>18501854>tickle himCute
>>18501029Because it signifies a man that’s given into the base pleasure of lust, and a disordered one at that. Not only does this man not control his instincts, but he pursues a disordered act with no reproductive goal. It’s entirely out of lust and forfeiting one’s masculinity for the sake of pleasure.
>>18501959I think this take is too infected by the modern gay identity which formed in the aftermath of the sexual revolution - an event which inaugurated an age of sexual excess for heterosexuals too, and perhaps with more disastrous effects. Both Plato and Plutarch said military bands composed of male lovers are more devoted and willing to sacrifice themselves than those composed even of kinsmen and relatives. The Hagakure also extols the self-sacrificial nature of male love. Even CS Lewis, no friend of homosexuality, comments on this:>If those of us who have known a school like Wyvern dared to speak the truth, we should have to say that pederasty, however great an evil in itself, was, in that time and place, the only foothold or cranny left for certain good things. It was the only counterpoise to the social struggle; the one oasis (though green only with weeds and moist only with fetid water) in the burning desert of competitive ambition. In his unnatural love affairs, and perhaps only there, the Blood went a little out of himself, forgot for a few hours that he was One of the Most Important People There Are. It softens the picture. A perversion was the only chink left through which something spontaneous and uncalculating could creep in. Plato was right after all. Eros, turned upside down, blackened, distorted, and filthy, still bore the traces of his divinity.The idea that homosexuality is something selfish just doesn't hold up to scrutiny
>>18501035>>18501052Do you have any real argument besides conflating ancient Greek concept of love between men with faggotry...? Or how they would be too stupid to understand that it takes two to participate in the act? You niggers never make any sense.
>>18502075Hitler said it was faggotry so it was faggotry.End of.
>>18502081You realize love can be nonsexual/non-romantic right? Did he call his own soldiers faggots?
>>18502083Of course. But Hitler wouldn’t call that kind of love a problem, would he? It’s quite easy to tell when the Greeks are talking about friendship vs erotic love, because they tend to use different words, to wit, philia and eros. Furthermore, they also make explicit references to intercrural and anal sex, sexual desire, sexual arousal
>>18502018>>18502093Homosexuality is a mental illness. If you start making naturalistic argument like many faggots do, you ignore the fact that animals don't do these things with homofaggotry in mind, they just do it because it feels good or because they want to like fucking a random pillow or any object really. When human men become gay, its very apparent that its a kind of compulsive disorder because they go out of their way to do something unhygienic, unproductive, degenerative, unmasculine etc. They are completely aware of that but do it anyways. They often chase things that are explicitly disgusting. Sex is a base desire, Eros is not to be automatically conflated with that since it pertains to a much higher concept but I know this is extremely difficult for many retards to understand so they just parrot whatever garbage they heard from their youtube idol instead. Or worse, project their own personal feelings onto these ancient ideas.
>>18502110That’s true. But the Greeks were still faggots.
