[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


The American inner cities are filled with Latinos living alongside blacks. In New York the Puerto Ricans hero-worship black people, they marry into their families and join them in Hip Hop culture. Blacks and Latinos are considered one oppressed group, everything that categories "black and brown" in America means black and Latino, there are no Asians, Arabs, Pakis, Indians etc involved despite being minorities in America as well, The other minority groups are categorized more closely with whites.

It's only Latinos and Native Americans who are seen as "part of the black struggle"

All black supremacist groups even the ones who identify as Muslims like the NOI do not include Arabs in their struggle, they only speak of "black and brown" in reference to Latinos and Natives whereas Arabs are dismissed as Caucasoid devils even though these people claim to follow an Arab in Muhammad.
>>
>>18501439
Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was part of the original Black Arab race

The Iranian, Indian and Turkish squatters in MENA claiming to be Arab are nothing but pale skinned devilish frauds
>>
>>18501439
They did, many Arab and Asian stores in black communities
>>
>>18501439
there are numerous arabs trying to be black
>>
>>18501462
But Black Supremacist groups do not consider Asians, Arabs as part of their community. They only consider Latinos and Native Americans part of their community. For example, many pan-African blacks and black supremacists label Asian and Arab store owners in the ghetto as "bloodsucking leeches, leeching off the community for their own benefit" the same way they regard Jews, so Asians and Arabs are always separated from Latinos and Natives and not viewed as brothers.
>>
>>18501587
/pol/ claims Arabs are more racist than whites and they will never permit their daughter to marry a black man even if the black man is a devout Muslim. We are told Arabs are way more hostile to blacks than whites are and that slavery of blacks still goes on in the Middle East and North Africa today. Yet you are saying Arabs want to be black. How can both things be true?
>>
>>18501666
Black supremacist groups also don't consider Native Americans or latinos to be part of their community. If anything, FBA will claim that they've been in America longer than the red man or latino. Not that many Black Americans don't have this admixture which they do, but I think it's a bit silly to argue over who's been here longer than whom.
>>
In Detroit a lot of Arabs lived around blacks but they tried to differentiate themselves and become “white” as did many other non Europeans. A lot of them were Arab Christians and more middle class and worked their way out of the ghetto as soon as possible. Many of them own liquor stores, food markets and gas stations in black neighborhoods which creates a lot of mutual hatred. In the 60s and 70s there was some union solidarity between blacks and Arabs in the auto plants, and there’s still some connection between black and Arab progressives, but also a lot of hostility towards blacks from the average Arab chud, even if they adopt some elements of hip hop culture.
>>
Who cares?

Nobody takes the opinions of these scumbags seriously.
>>
File: big funny.jpg (35 KB, 1024x819)
35 KB JPG
>>18501667
/pol/ occupies more real estate in your tortured little brain than anyone you know irl KEK
>>
File: muhammad.png (2.48 MB, 832x1381)
2.48 MB PNG
>>18501456
>Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was part of the original Black Arab race

it is well established that he was white with a red beard, probably looked something like pic related
>>
>>18502886
Muslims pain their beard red all the time.
>>
>>18501439
It comes down to enfranchisement. The Latinos are by and large either immigrants themselves or children of immigrants (puerto ricans excluded). For most of post war American history, that means they're illegal immigrants. Being disenfranchised they naturally grew a distrust of government and legitimate authority, something they shared with black people for similar reasons. Blacks not only lived in lower income and thus more affordable neighborhoods they also were very unlikely to report people to immigration or LEO's who might cooperate with immigration. This allowed latinos to exist in relative seclusion and security, insulated from the government and anyone that might scrutinize their legality. As their children were born American and grew up the trends simply continued. And certain cultural attitudes would be adopted from blacks, like the gang lifestyle and ghetto mentality. Both originally adapted from southern rednecks and developed for similar reasons like a distrust of authority and lack of participation in government/polite society.
>>
>>18502934
The reason other groups did not develop this relationship when blacks and latinos did, is because most other immigrant groups are primarily legal migrants. Who enjoyed full enfranchisement as soon as they entered the country and had no fear of the government or its authority, and would rather in fact readily participate and cooperate with both to their benefit.
>>
>>18501439
I think you're delusional. Black separatist types (Nation of Islam, Hoteps, Black Hebrew Israelites, Foundational Black Americans, etc. etc.) absolutely do NOT see latinos as "part of them". Idk where you got that from. But they may be more tolerant of them simply because latinos tend to stick in the hood, whereas other groups try to make some money and GTFO as quickly as possible.
>>
>>18502914
Look at Mohammed's supposed living descendants today, they look pretty damn white.
>>
>>18502941
Other large immigrant groups, not benefiting from an extensive land border with the United states, had to enter through an exclusionary, expensive and lengthy immigration process rather than attempt illegal entry. Additionally, many of these groups would be selectively isolationist. Retaining as much of their own culture as they conveniently could and preferring to deal with members of their own cultural but primarily linguistic background eschewing the wider American societal norms where they could. Though this was done with varying success it is rare to still see 1st generation migrants from Vietnamese, Chinese, Korean, Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds who have not learned at least a fairly respectable amount of broken English. Whereas with Latinos, 1st generation immigrants not knowing English is still comparatively commonplace due to the aforementioned tendency to hide from government and any arms of their authority as well as it not being at all a requirement for the less than legal methods of employment their community would seek. .
>>
>>18501439
Asians and Arabs operate businesses in black hoods
>>
>>18502975
But they tend to not live amongst or integrate into those communities, nor do they readily adopt cultural mannerisms from them either. Rather they seem to enjoy a purely extraction based transactional relationship. Where they take advantage of the low property values in those areas to own and operate their own businesses but live and conduct leisure activities either in their own insular communities or more wide afield in more culturally mainstream areas.
>>
>Arabs didn't
Very American take.
Even in the arab monarchies you see black people, even Iran has the zanj and Pakistan have their own word for their historical black minority. Not that they get on or are treated equally as a group but they always had a visible minority unlike say Spain which somehow got rid of all of theirs by the 19th century.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.