Can't you just settle the endless debate about whether the Old Testament laws are still applicable under the New Testament with the position that the ceremonial law does apply but only for Jews and not for the end of being justified in the eyes of God but just as their prescribed way of life, while the moral law is for everyone else. The Old Testament temple rituals and ceremonies were for the Jews' purification
What do your christfag leaders tell you?
>>18502796You should provide evidence and arguments for your position.
>>18502796Zion is the body of Christ is the kingdom of heaven is the Law incarnate.You that would deny the divinity of Christ should be seized by the body of Christ, and then held beneath water until you see the light or are no longer an impediment to the salvation of the light in Christ.
>>18502796>ceremonial lawthere's no such distinction, it's made up by conmen to justify the random choice of OT laws their flock inherited as mandatory.
>>18502880Did you miss the part where I said it was for Jews only
>>18503462dispensationalism is a retarded heresy that nobody with any sense takes seriously
>>18502796Temple law is invalid without a temple and a priesthood descended from Levi.
>>18503476What about when the temple was destroyed the first time
>>18503470This. (Scofield) was a hack, not a scholarHis whole 'ideology' is a pathetic attempt to talmudize the BibleIt obciously failed, and will be cosigned to the dustbin of history where it belongs when the last evangelical boomer kicks the bucket
>>18503487They had to build a second temple
>>18503489It was invented by John Nelson Darby not Scofield tho
>>18503494Yeah but they established ways of worshipping God without the physical temple and also Jesus is the new temple anyway if they're messianic Jews
>>18503502Scofield is the one who spread it so I went with him
>>18503506No, they just focused on laws that didn't require the temple until the temple was reestablished. They didn't invent new laws.
>>18503541So can't they keep doing that
>>18503649they can do whatever they want but because they are in violation of the covenant they are forsaken, and their claims to the contrary are lies
>>18503470>dispensationalism is a retarded heresy that nobody with any sense takes seriouslyBy that logic every christcuck is a literal heretic to some degree. I haven't met a single Christian who's not at least a little bit dispensationalist. What the fuck would a non dispensationalist christcuck even look like?
>>18503681What if they keep doing that + worship Jesus
