To facilitate the exchange of goods and services. It's an IOU that everyone agrees to accept

>>18504883
Because I dont want a piece of your filthy apartment or a goat leg.

>We now have 6 year olds posting on /his/

>>18504883
It is a Babylonian Magick ritual
Money is attention plus time
If people put their attention and time into being wagies they won't use their attention and time to activate their Divine Spark and make the ruling class obsoloete

>>18504887
>To facilitate the exchange of goods and services

from working gentiles to non working jews

>>18504883
To make exchanges more convinent.

>>18504934
you turning everything into whining about the Jews sure is going to make people take your side.

>>18504952
you not realizing it's the jews will make you lose

>>18504954
I'd rather lose than be associated with annoying spazes whinging about late stage capitalism and work reforms.

>>18504883


MONEY DOES NOT EXIST, BUT RATHER, THERE IS MONEY.

EXISTENCE IS EXCLUSIVE TO RATIONAL AND VOLITIVE ENTITIES.

THERE IS MONEY, BECAUSE IT WAS INVENTED; IT WAS INVENTED, BECAUSE IT IS MORE CONVENIENT TO CARRY COINS, AND BILLS, THAN IT IS TO CARRY GOLD, SILVER, COPPER, PRODUCE, SOIL, ET CETERA: MONEY SIGNIFIES GOODS, BUT IT ALSO SIGNIFIES WORK; WORK MADE TANGIBLE AND FUNGIBLE.

IMAGINE THAT THINGS, AND LABOUR, ARE TOKENIZED; THOSE TOKENS ARE MONEY.

NOW, GO, AND DO NOT RETURN TO THIS WEBSITE UNTIL YOU ARE EIGTHEEN YEARS OF AGE, OK?

>>18504883
To be a non-linear optimizer for supply chains. Remember that money arose in metal form once cities began to trade unique commodities like timber, slaves, honey, silk, etc.

You reduce the amount of necessary time to complete projects or satisfy demands by having fungible assets, like gold or silver, that aren't as perishable as products like grains or oil. This allows for the creation of an extensive, regional network of producers.

>>18504883
To tokenize the abstract concept of value. Real value comes from many sources (property, physical assets, skills, social connections, etc). By converting it to a coin (and in modern times, digital bit), value has been concentrated into one medium, that is easily manipulable by those that produce it.

By measuring value in money, and getting people to accept this measurement, they can now take other people's value relatively easily. Without money if a ruler or elite wanted to extract wealth from his populace, he had to physically take their land (requires physical conflict and forces to occupy it continously), their assets (also requires physical confiscation and many assets are large and not easy to transport, or just have no use to be hoarded), their skills (slavery, which is obviously is resource-consuming and unpopular), or their social connections (not really possible to steal). Money, on the other hand, is very easy to take, easy to transport, and permanently holds value.

Additionally, rulers have the ability to 'create' value, originally by mining more gold/silver, then by printing more paper money, and now by the click of a button. Of course, this doesn't actually create more value in a society, but because the people accept money as a store of value, these people have a higher valuation and more power.

Money is probably the only way to operate a complex modern economy, but it is certainly evil, even if a necessary one. The quantification of the abstract concept of value, allows for all sorts of manipulation and sorcery by those that control it.

>>18504883
It's a impersonal medium of exchange, that became useful when personal exchange such of communal debt and charity faded from the growing international trade and industrialization.

Aka, the break down of insular communities into states and nation's necessitated medium of exchange that personal connection couldn't match.

>>18504954
I'll never understand why people like you think to exclude people like Peter Thiel and include some random jew in New York who works at a Walmart as part of the problem with society. Yeah it is "the jews" but the right wing always exaggerates.

>>18504883
It was originally a form of enslavement but now that everything is going digital is has unironically become one of the last forms of financial freedom.
>>18504934
>>18504954
Money is older than jews.

>>18504883
It was supposed to represent general goods and debts. Would you rather sell me bread for fish or sell me bread for a note that let you buy anything lol.

>>18504883
The invention of coinage allowed the state to much more efficiently tax the productivity of its subjects, and pay for mercenaries.

>>18504883
To bring meaning to life.

>>18504952
Don't judge him for it, DA JOOS are the reason he can't get a job, has a fat and unattractive body, is socially incapable of forming friendships, and has a PP that compares poorly to his little toe.

>>18505960
Jews are deeply obsessed with genitalia, why? You snip your penises, you can't fuck buttholes but are obsessed with talking about them, the pussy is the only thing you fuckers hate, and when a woman bleeds from it, gives birth from it, or gets cummed in she's seen as a literal untouchable in your community.

>>18504933
I still got fucked over when I wasnt being a wagie making money so something else must be going on.

>>18504883
Becouse people refuse to live fit and proper lives

>>18504933
If everyone "activated their divine spark", there wouldn't be material prosperity.

File: please be patient I have (...).jpg (29 KB, 520x561)

29 KB JPG

>>18504883
Because of blood money. The invention of money was not economical, but born out of the cultural concept of blood feuding and the possibility of ending one by compensating the wounded family with currency. Villages can be self-sustaining and don't necessarily need currency. They can just survive on barter. Blood feuds however can only be repaid with coin. You wouldn't want one of the parties to start bartering about the quality and age of the goats, they would give in exchange for murdering the son of a family.

t. esoteric fascist knower

>>18504954
you have to understand that, for some reason, there are lots of unironic kikes on this board. I dont know why.

>>18506081
This picture gives me the creeps and always makes me think of lolicons

File: please be patient I have (...).png (288 KB, 530x527)

288 KB PNG

>>18506095
Is this better?

>>18506081
I don't think that's what it is. Even if you like esoteric stuff there should still be some sense behind it and you would have to find an actual meaning behind why blood feuds have to be paid with money when technically blood would be the most equal payment type for blood feuds.

It would make more sense that people who are soulless and closed off from God would have no other recourse but to use non-living materials for exchange.

Perhaos they don't have access to the original inspiration of creation so they try to bypass it by having everyone depend on some kind of currency.

Perhaps it is just more easily exploitable than having to build something from scratch.

>>18506098
>I don't think that's what it is. Even if you like esoteric stuff there should still be some sense behind it and you would have to find an actual meaning behind why blood feuds have to be paid with money when technically blood would be the most equal payment type for blood feuds.
Exactly! But the sense behind it makes you uncomfortable. That's why you are not thinking. Aryans want to create order on this world. But to create a concept such as blood money, you need to give Human Life an ABSTRCT VALUE. This dark thought, which the cattle of today, don't even DARE to think contributed to the wonderful and useful invention of money. People needed to figure out exactly what a Human being is worth. And you know what? They did. They actually did. There are Germanic legal sources we can read today, which list exactly what a person was worth. A nobleman for example was 3 times the worth of a freeman. If a servant killed a man, he would have to pay an additional wirgild, if he fled after the murder.

This is the uncomfortable truth behind it. But if that doesn't convince you, I invite you to look at the linguistic origins of various verbs related to "paying". The latin word pacare meaning "to pay" originally meant " to make peace with an enemy". Nietzsche's genealogy of morals again trumps all other approaches.

>It would make more sense that people who are soulless and closed off from God would have no other recourse but to use non-living materials for exchange.
>Perhaos they don't have access to the original inspiration of creation so they try to bypass it by having everyone depend on some kind of currency.
>Perhaps it is just more easily exploitable than having to build something from scratch.
Holy fuck, now I feel silly for not reading this, before writing my post. I was actually talking to goycattle.

>>18506106
Ok autist

>>18506064
the only one itt to get to the point of my inquiry. if I go to mcdonalds for a cheeseburger, why do they want money for it? why can't I just get one and leave? why is EVERYTHING subject to monetary evaluation? mcdonalds or whoever don't trust me to provide them any value so they won't just give me a cheeseburger, i HAVE to pay money for it.

>>18504883
Partly as to alchemical causes as to that, just think on newton as the master to the mint as one to the causes to ways to currency and money and before newton to time was when england was still viking ridding and the danelaw held sway except for wessex like that tv show the last kingdom anyway i imagine those trading systems are sort like analogous to political economy and braudel would claim like diablo two or something like that where under those medieval conditions the stone rings of jordan emerges as the unit of currency until bretton woods or something like that
Stone ring of Jordan wessex last kingdom currency

>>18506128
at least his heart is in the right place you dick

I'll give you an actual historical non-R*ddit answer, OP, unlike most in here.

1. Metals became valuable with the rise of civilization for tools, weapons, etc.
2. States needed something other states desired when trading since nobody was self-sufficient. Metals were universally and constantly desired so their value remained stable and predictable. It was also relatively easy to hold and transfer, and had raw utility value.
3. States realized smaller pieces of said metals represented value and access to goods, and started *minting* it into smaller pieces and handing it out in exchange for whatever the state needed.