Why did both Burma and Fiji decide independently to kick out or oppress their indian population?
because jeets see themselves as superior and tried to oppress the natives
Fiji still has jeets
>>18508155because they were retarded. Indians held up their economy, because the natives were just too retarded to work. After Indians were kicked out, they instantly became shitholes.
>>18509446>Indians held up their economyAs coolie labour.>the natives were just too retarded to workAs in they didn't want to slave away for pennies all for the benefit of a foreign company.>After Indians were kicked out, they instantly became shitholes.Sheer masturbatory delusion.
>>18508155Add Uganda to the list.
>>18509473Yeah Burma is such a nice place now, right? With all the constant wars between the junta, rebel groups and ethnic separatists!>As in they didn't want to slave away for pennies all for the benefit of a foreign company.Bet most of them were happy about dying from animal attacks in their 20s, when foraging in the jungle like savages.
>>18509486>With all the constant wars between the junta, rebel groups and ethnic separatists!That wasn't because of kicking out Indians lol.>Bet most of them were happy about dying from animal attacks in their 20s, when foraging in the jungle like savages.Why the hell do you care how they lived or that there were only two binary options? Why are you trying to glamouruze the fact that the empire shipped people around like disposable labour units to prop up the massive in built mismismanagement and inefficiencies inherent in the system?
>>18509497Indians were the traders and entrepreneurs. Expelling them crashed the economy. The natives were just too stupid to manage a capitalist economy. The economic system Brits left in place?>empire shipped people around Maybe because most of the time the locals were unfit for work. Behaving similarly to the niggers in Empire of Dust. Whenever they liked it or not, they needed these foreign population to run their economies. How well did Zimbabwe fare after kicking out the only group capable of running things?
>>18509486>With all the constant wars between the junta, rebel groups and ethnic separatists!Are you implying the presence of Indians in Burma would have prevented this?
>>18509446>>18509486>>18509537TRVKES, you guys need to cool it with the anti-indian posting. At least when it comes to the third world, the Indians there actually are a benefit for the countries they reside in, and the gripes the natives have are not legitimate. The British always brought in Indians because the natives were legitimately too stupid and lazy to be of any use.
>>18509446saaaaar we help gdp with doordash bloody bastard
>FijiwutA third of Fiji is of Indian descent>BurmaMore of a religious thing if you're talking about Rohingyas. And the reason there is Muslims being Muslims.
>>18509554>At least when it comes to the third world, the Indians there actually are a benefit for the countries they reside in, and the gripes the natives have are not legitimate.Lmao you can't selectively push one angle while trying to ignore how much it would apply to you too. Don't be a fraud.>The British always brought in Indians because the natives were legitimately too stupid and lazy to be of any useThey solely wanted disposable labour that would also let them bot invest in local education. What is "stupid and lazy" to you? Not wanting to work for 10 hours straight under tropical summer heat or getting eaten by cheeky lions? Get over yourself.
>>18509537>Expelling them crashed the economy.It still exists. Imagine basing your self worth off how much money you make for other people.>The natives were just too stupid to manage a capitalist economy. The economic system Brits left in place?A system that hinged off kneecaping local economic participation and hoarding resources that said empires would still fumble and STILL get trounced?>Maybe because most of the time the locals were unfit for work. Behaving similarly to the niggers in Empire of Dust.That film sucked. You do know that Chinese guy hired random unqualified nobodies rather than actually doing formal and proper candidate searching? That's like going to home depot for labour in your renovation company.>Whenever they liked it or not, they needed these foreign population to run their economies.So thr empire kneecaps the locals... the uses that to justify importing coolies because paying better wages or training locals (for literal pennies) is too much?>How well did Zimbabwe fare after kicking out the only group capable of running things?Other African states developed without having to dicksuck settlers. Zimbabwe also faced it's economic downtown due to corruption and bad pwoerplays in the Congo war. The whole fixation on it being brcause they "expelled whites" is a totally false narrative since most whites in Zimzamland are urban.
>>18509678>More of a religious thing if you're talking about RohingyasNah the anti-Indian thing was something that started long long ago. Burma also has a strong anti-Chinese sentiment despite the PRC holding up the regime somewhat.>And the reason there is Muslims being Muslims.False. Pretty mucb every ethnic group in Burma has an armed rebel gang, also a ton of ethnic persecution of ither indigenous by the Bamar. Also the military government has actually done major repression and arrests of the Buddhist institutions and individuals. A lot of them either were critics of the government or called out corruption.
>>18509696If the natives were not stupid and lazy, why haven't they been able to flourish without the Indians? And also>What is "stupid and lazy" to you? Not wanting to work for 10 hours straight under tropical summer heat or getting eaten by cheeky lions? Get over yourself.That's the shit they have to put up with regardless because of how undeveloped their country is, SOMEONE has to do it or else nothing is getting done. How are they going to become developed without dealing with the grimy part? Every other developed country did.
>>18509756>why haven't they been able to flourish without the Indians?Fiji still has an economy, East African economies ate making major strides. Like what exaxtly do you want? Colonialism but with Indians instead and speculating on land and housing into perpetuity?>That's the shit they have to put up with regardless because of how undeveloped their country is.Getting worked to death/exhaustion is shit anon. You expect people to willingly gamble with their lives, more so when many colonies outright garnished wages or used coerced unpaid labour?>How are they going to become developed without dealing with the grimy part? Every other developed country did.Lmao where the fuck do you get your beliefs from? Why do you think basically being basically trapped as a labour underclass with jackshit rights is remotely even sustainable? More so when many of these colonies were white collar job welfare programs for the middle class who couldn't hack it back home or needed to pad their resumés. Like what incentive do you think any of these colonies have in actually doing key reforms or actually educating people ao the system is actually efficient. The minute even 5 guys get an engineering they are basically seen as a threat to the system.
Foreigners suck.
>>18509872>More so when many of these colonies were white collar job welfare programs for the middle class who couldn't hack it back home or needed to pad their resumésWhat cope is this lol, colonial service jobs were among the most competitive civil service positions available.
>>18509874>colonial service jobs were among the most competitive civil service positions available.Still job welfare. Especially in places in Africa or Asia outside of India where they could have used locals. Many colonial budgets were bloated because they decide to pay 10x the salary (pegged to metropole CoL) for a role instead of hiring a local who'd be paid based on much cheaper wages locally but still good for the CoL (and actually developing a middle class)
>>18509878It's this same retarded shit that leads tk massive budget bloat in NGO's. They basically burn it all hiring expats and "volunteers" (paid a fully salary lol) then wonder why they are almost broke. That's before we get into manager and Chief executive salaries.
Because they already knew what ypipo are only learning now.
>>18509914Real talk the whole "anti-Indian" wave will blow over. It's not to the same level of anti-black, anti-African or anti-Native sentiments which are basically cultural institutions and exports at this point.
