Why are consenting sexual acts between adults and juveniles considered morally wrong?
>>18510446GLOWIE ALERT!!!!!
>>18510446retardation ideas and moralism plus women being old and wanting to get rid of competitionthe same ppl enforcing it are the Eppy island ppl btw
>>18510473Thread>>18510446It is about humiliating the male populace and keeping them desperate and complacent too, for 99% of human history, even as early as the 1980s, as long as the girl or boy already hit puberty (13+ or so) it was okay. It is literally biology.
>>18510449Not everything is glowies, if you live afraid to speak your mind and thinking everyone with convictions is a glowie, then what do you have left? Do you even have free thoughts at that point?
>>18510446>You tell me.
Since nobody in this thread is emotionally mature enough to say it, the real reason is that teenagers are literal fucking retards and it's unethical to have sex with retards because it is too easy to manipulate them or take advantage of them. If you don't understand this or disagree then you are either: - A retard yourself , or - You haven't spoken to an actual teenager IRL since you were in high school yourself, which is why you have no basis for estimating their level of mental development.
>>18511362Nice try fed
>>18511749OP isn't even talking about teenages. His picrel suggests literal children.
>>18511749Dumbest post of the day
>>18510446Sex just seems to be a very deep part of the human psyche. It needs to be treated with a certain reverence and care or it can lead to very pathological results.
>>18511749>the real reason is that teenagers are literal fucking retards and it's unethical to have sex with retardsWomen are retarded children. The entire concept of female concept is a myth.
