>>18510500
Dispensationalism is a retarded heresy invented in the 1830s and is pushed by jews because it is what jews want Christianity to be, but only Avery small minority of Christians are dispensationalists, notably American evangelicals.

They try to push the idea that all Christians are dispensationalists, and many like you fell for it.

>>18510508
I never thought that all Christians(I don't see how you got that from my post), or even all American Christians, were dispensationalists. But it does seem that of all "Christian" denominations(I don't really consider Evangelicals to be Christian), in America Evangelicals seem to have the largest influence in American politics and culture. How has Evangelicalism been allowed to attain this supremacy in American Christianity without much push back from Catholics or Lutherans?

>>18510536
>How
Its the case that politicians pretend to be christian but are loyal to zionists first. But in order to not spook the American Christian voters, they brand themselves dispensationalists, advancing the jewish agenda of making all Christians dispensationalists.

da joos

>>18510536
I don’t know about Lutherans, but it typically met with tremendous pushback from Calvinist denominations must of which published official statements condemning Dispensationalism as heresy and prohibiting it among the clergy. To this day it has not found purchase among the Presbyterian and Reformed churches of North America.

>>18510605
Haha, no.
Maybe some of the rainbow flag presby churches have issued condemnations of it, but I'd be willing to bet the slew of Baptists who support it are mostly of the "reformed" variety.

Calvinists and their very many schisms practically invented it.
Puritans in fact famously said that the Jews should physically return to Judea, made it a part of their eschatology.

Plenty of the early dispensationalists were actually Presbyterians.
Like Cyrus Scofield himself actually, fun fact. And James Brookes, look up this cat to see what old school presbys were really up to. William J Erdman too.

To this day, widely popular Calvinists like Macarthur notably are self affirmed dispensationalists.

Simply put, there is no reformed magisterium capable of speaking collectively for Calvinism. It just doesn't exist. I sure am sorry you don't consider that to be "real" Calvinism, but that's not something you can authoritatively define.

If you could, you would have to explain what gives you the right as opposed to say Donald Barnhouse or Dr Lewis Johnston.
What is the Bible Presbyterian Church, if not finding purchase?

Like I get it, you really want that to not be true.
But frankly the truth isn't that clean cut. The mainlines don't own Presbyterianism, and that's a good thing because if they did the entire denomination would simply die.

>>18510500

Because protestants were nowhere near as hostile to jews and catholics were. most of the expulsions from 109 nations were from catholic ones. America was founded as a Protestant project, so it was automatically less hostile to jews. When the zionist movement began in early 1900s, anti-semetism was nowhere near as prevalent in america as it was in europe, so it was easier to convince christians groups to support their movement.