He himself failed miserably in vol 3 of capital, so do Bortkiewicz and Sweezy. Shaikh's solution is dogahh, and TSSI got owned by Mohun and Veneziani. Is it over?
>>18511676Is this why everything in vol 3 is wrong? Were engels and kautsky stupid?
>>18511674>Is it over?Yeah but the real redpill is understanding that the SNLT/LTV is not that important to marxist thought. It's why most marxists I've seen are not that hostile towards Sraffa
>>18511674>>18511963>TSSI got owned by Mohun and VenezianiIt also didn't really get owned. Saying that the TSII framework isn't "provable" doesn't mean it's false, it simply means it's unfalsifiable. But most marxists don't really care nowadays, if you look at Shaikh or Cockshott's works you realize that it doesn't even matter all that much, given that historical materialism has and will always be the core of marxism (which creates other problems though)
>>18511674>>18511971>>18511963The problem with Marxism is essentially the same problem with Christianity. Marx was just a guy who said some things (like Jesus), some of which were good and some of which were not (like Jesus). Instead of just taking the good ideas and integrating them with the broader school that he comes from, people decided to take his words for gospel and completely ignore the school that he came from, and then they built a new school based on this gospel, inheriting all of the bad ideas and magnifying them because everything is too afraid to criticize them.I dare you to name the category of thought that Marx comes from and his precursors (and not just people who said things that vaguely sound Marxian).
>>18512375>everything*everyone
>>18512375>I dare you to name the category of thought that Marx comes from and his precursorsEconomically ? Classical economists and ricardians. Philosophically ? Left-hegelian movement.
