Is Papal infallibility itself a modern innovation and error? It seems hard to say the ancients and medievals accepted it in its current form, and it is a response to particularly modern issues in what is itself a particularly modern way.
>>18513172Well, I guess if you define 1869 as "modern" or not. Academically that's well into the modern era but I understand that in colloquial parlance "modern" generally only starts around the world wars or even after.
>>18513172>Is Papal infallibility itself a modern innovation and error?NO.
>>18513172Papal infallibility is a religious institution bullshit.There is a HUGE difference between a religious institution and a religion.
>>18513280fuck off, monkey
>>18513172Everyone who is catholic will burn in hell. Follow the true teachings from Gods true remnant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f41IXBx4KpgRepent from eating pork. Repent from doing christmas.
