Why doesn't every history book start with stating that this guy was obsessed with giving enemas to teenaged girls?
>>18515354>Why doesn't every history book start with stating that this guy was obsessed with giving enemas to teenaged girls?SAAR DALIT DIS, BLODY BENCHOD, TERIMAKUCHUTE!
why don't they say hitler liked black or milk coffee? because they're factoids irrelevant to what they did
>>18515354>>18515799"Iconic images of Gandhi show him walking with two young women on either side, his hands resting on their shoulders. Those two women, who ‘replaced his walking stick’, were Abha (seventeen) and Manu (eighteen) – his grandnieces. By day, they would walk with him. By night, they would sleep with him – naked.They were among the many women subjects with whom Gandhi conducted his experiments in Brahmacharya or ‘celibacy tests’. These tests, which Gandhi claims were his ‘moral duty,’ involved him sleeping naked next to nubile, naked women without touching them. This was an exercise to ascertain if he and ‘his organ’ would be sexually aroused.These experiments were no secret. Gandhi contextualised, discussed and justified them in terms of morality and spirituality – as a step towards union with God. When Vallabhai Patel, disturbed by these so-called experiments in celibacy, wrote to Gandhi telling him what he was doing was ‘Adharma’ (immoral), the ‘Mahatma’ retorted in his characteristic manner and proclaimed: For me Manu sleeping with me is a matter of dharma (moral duty)What is disturbing is the conviction with which Gandhi claimed that these experiments were essential for him to test himself against his weakness. “If I don’t let Manu sleep with me, though I regard it as essential that she should,” he announced, “wouldn’t that be a sign of weakness in me?”"
>>18515806>>18515354>>18515799If he didn't touch them and the girls consented to sleeping with him then what's the problem? He committed no crime, specially compared to fbi statistics on pedophilia which prove white men are the main perpetrators of pedophilia crimes in the usa :)
>>18515834Also they were 18
>>18515834>If he didn't touch themGhandi: Bro, trust, bro, trust, I am just testing to see if my dick still doesn't work(x) Doubt.Let's forget the fact that they were his grand nieces, ew, and he probably slept with many other young women at least some of which were far younger.
>>18515354>Pedo who sold out the country to its enemies every chance he gotIndians had the worst founding father of any modern country
>>18515354Because that's a false statement by some random antichrist.
>>18515806>For me Manu sleeping with me is a matter of dharma (moral duty)It's a moral duty for Ghandi to cope with his insecurities about his lust by sleeping around with underage women and that is if he is telling the truth which I highly doubt. Couldn't he just meditate on his lust demons instead of sleeping butt naked with young girls? He might as well have fucked them in the small chance that he was actually telling the truth about his eccentric behavior. I mean, he is already there, cock out, ready to rock.
>>18515848>Pedo who sold out the country to its enemies every chance he gotAnon I...
>>18515354He also constantly gave himself enemas. He was a man who enjoyed shitting and wanted others to share in that joy. Is that so wrong?
>>18515834>White men are second in US population only to white womenYeah, that makes sense, statistically illiterate anon.
>>18515939>Yeah, that makes sense, statistically illiterate anon.
>>18515834>he didn't touch them>they consented>he committed no crimeJust like Michael Jackson.
>>18515982the difference is jackson earned them boys
>>18515834>white men are the main perpetrators of pedophilia crimes in the usa
>>18515848you should read up about Latin American and African history some timenot that Gandhi was perfect but there's way worse out there
