Why after the fall of the western roman empire, the southern territories of the roman empire became, today, poor and the Germanic kingdoms, some part of the roman empire, throve?
>>185156441000 years later after the geographic discoveries wow. you really are a retard
>>18515644You are literally talking about the southern territories as if their Roman heritage had any influence on them still but no, it has been 2k years. Their Roman heritage means nothing anymore.To answer your question, the southern territories were looted and brutalized by northern colonizers. France famously does everything in his power to keep Libya and Algeria in shambles permanently. Southern Italy are extremely lazy white people who only care about fishing and going to the beach. Egypt has been permanently cucked by anglos and in modern times by shitsrael.
>>18515644constantinople and cordoba were the bastions of civilization during le dark ages
>>18515650I'm just asking, why would be barbarians the ones who defeated you and dominated the whole world. French aren't Mediterranean, they are Franks. Also, Spain and Portugal didn't have a lot of colonies compared to Northern Europeans.
>>18515650>its all cause of France, England and Jews.>except italy, theyre lazy white peopleArabs will never be able to coexist with first world
>>18515650>Southern Italy are extremely lazy white peopleSicilians are nafris, they don't have any Germanic blood.
Not true. Italy was wealthier than most of Europe until the industrial revolution by merit of being the center of trade of the Mediterranean, topped only by the Netherlands with their own renaissance.
>>18515669Sicilians aren't ''nafris'', they plot very far from nafris. If being ''white'' (hello amerimutt!) means being ''germanic'' than most of Europe isn't white
>>18515650>looted and brutalizedWhy? Northern Europeans were superior beings who vanquished inferiors in war?
