Was Ali ibn Abi Talib in the wrong?
>>18517973No. He wasn't "evil", but not the true successor to the Prophet either.
>>18517973Ali simply lacked muhammads cunning and tactical strength, and nor was he as great a general as abu bakr or umar or as great an administrator as uthman. It made no sense to give the throne to him on the basis of his ties to muhammad. Thus he was assassinated by a kharijite.And while imam hussein didnt deserve to die, if you actually read the events leading up to his death, if anything yazid was a lot more intelligent and arguably reasonable.
Focus on God. Forget all the rest.
>>18517973He somehow ended up allowing non-arabs to organize into weird cults and break the arab caste system a hundred years after his death. It's pure historical kino.The world would have been a different place if this retard didn't get so arrogant and get himself killed by the Abbasids. He controlled Iran and was poised to strike the Abbasids but entered Abbasid sphere of influence and got himself killed. Smh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_MuslimHe's also the reason Turks were tricked into islam>Arab preacher>tells a bunch of turks stories of Ali>Turk converts>Gets shoved homosexual legalism bullshit down his throat completely contrary to what he was expecting>A group of turks called Alevis did manage to avoid this shit and continued their ways
>>18517973I asked the muslim at the bodega if he was sunni or shia and he went on a ten minute long rant about how the shia worship ali “like you worship jesus” and it was very uncomfortable I wish I didnt say anyting
>>18517973Why do Shia aesthetics mog Sunnoid aesthetics so hard?
Sunnoids literally killed the entire family of their prophet and they think they're better Muslims than Shia.