>>18520009
>inb4 coping christards saying their gods commanded evil but now after they went to therapy on the cross they are all about peace and love
14 I looked, and there before me was a white cloud, and seated on the cloud was one like a son of man with a crown of gold on his head and a sharp sickle in his hand. 15 Then another angel came out of the temple and called in a loud voice to him who was sitting on the cloud, “Take your sickle and reap, because the time to reap has come, for the harvest of the earth is ripe.” 16 So he who was seated on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the earth was harvested.
17 Another angel came out of the temple in heaven, and he too had a sharp sickle. 18 Still another angel, who had charge of the fire, came from the altar and called in a loud voice to him who had the sharp sickle, “Take your sharp sickle and gather the clusters of grapes from the earth’s vine, because its grapes are ripe.” 19 The angel swung his sickle on the earth, gathered its grapes and threw them into the great winepress of God’s wrath. 20 They were trampled in the winepress outside the city, and blood flowed out of the press, rising as high as the horses’ bridles for a distance of 1,600 stadia. (about 180 miles/300 kilometers)

>>18520009
What's wrong with that? God was being realistic. Young men are sent to fight and sacrifice themselves for others, so isn't it fair that they at least get to fulfil their sexual appetites by using the enemies bodies?

>>18520024
Why are their sexual appetites satisfied by children and why do you approve of this horrible commandment? You're a sick fuck, yes?

>>18520028
They're not literal children, but virgins who had undergone puberty. Since they're having sex with men being commanded by God himself, they should be grateful.

>>18520009
That's pretty cringe. But at least theists have enough moral sense to get defensive about genocide and blame God. Atheists will rape, torture and murder countless millions because some guy with a mustache told them to.

File: 1775636326765849.png (75 KB, 882x786)

75 KB PNG

>>18520031
No they are children, the word means "Children, little ones, infants" https://biblehub.com/hebrew/2945.htm

>>18520032
>because some guy with a mustache told them to.
Jesus?

>>18520040
>i'm having a psychotic episode

>>18520038
They wouldn't really want to have sex with literal children and babies. They probably adopted the baby girls and had sex with the pubescent ones.

File: 1765952834274847.png (64 KB, 1079x799)

64 KB PNG

>>18520043
Nice head canon but the text is as clear as it can be and they had no problem with that as we can see by the commentary these people gave very early on. The bible itself is full of sick approval for these kind of acts. Can you explain how they checked for virginity btw? Did they make the soldiers prod around?

>>18520054
Even if they had no problem with it, having sex with God's men is much better than having sex with heathens. The girls get to live and the men get to fulfil their bodily desires.

>>18520065
So you are a sick fuck, got it!
>having sex with God's men is much better than having sex with heathens
is that what your priest told you before he went cave exploring?

>>18520024
why do Christkikes love defending pedophilia so much?

>>18520065
Maybe you meant, getting raped by "Gods chosen kikes" is better than having sex with heathens.
Just shows that the desert cult always reveals itself.

>>18520043
You wouldnt even accept such mental gymnastics for the arsenokoi

>>18520009
>commit heinous acts for hundreds of years
>write a book saying god told you to do it
genius

>>18520032
So atheists are courageous enough to actually blame the real man in charge of the government instead of scapegoating an invisible magician?

>>18520032
>But at least theists have enough moral sense to get defensive about genocide and blame God
every time this thread gets made theists come in here insisting this was totally fine and/or the virgin girls were NOT being taken as sex slaves but some other thing that mysteriously didn't apply to the virgin boys
>Atheists will rape, torture and murder countless millions because some guy with a mustache told them to.
do you think the german soldiers were atheists? their belt buckles had "Gott mit uns" written on them

>>18520043
They were Jews anon, of course they had sex with children.

File: 1777833488166520.jpg (70 KB, 600x804)

70 KB JPG

>>18520032
Stalin was sent by God to cleanse the world of the trannie nazi menace.

>>18520326
If God commands you to have sex with children, there's nothing wrong with doing it.

>>18520383
Keeping a child for yourself doesn't imply she has to be your wife immediately, you're just calling dibs on her.

I don't understand the need to defend the bible. Obviously, the bible is not the word of God, and it says ridiculous shit throughout. Why double down and defend this stupid shit instead of just accepting the book is not divinely inspired?

File: IMG_0394.png (189 KB, 459x570)

189 KB PNG

>>18520009
What about this one ?

>>18520038
>>18520028
They’re not raping the infants. They’re keeping virgin females because virgin females can be imprinted upon.
>UHHH THATS LE HECKIN WRONG
Look brother you’re not a Wignat pagan, you’re a spiteful mutant shitlib who hates Christianity (even though these passages are of old Judaism), you don’t give a fuck about children. You are at best ambivalent about abortion and you’re currently ruled by child sacrificing pedophiles.

Do not grandstand to the specter of your boomer dad, arch Bible thumper and terror of your house, who fucked your mother and tormented your rebellious ass with his authority, about Christian ethics or the ethics of God leading the ancient Hebrews.

They weren’t libtards. The world isn’t liberal. There will be no revolutionary workers paradise.
I saw your post in discord. If this isn’t (You) then fine sure my mistake but you sound identical to the tranny making these snipes on discord then cross posting them to /his/.
>>18520286
They were taken as virgins and there’s nothing wrong with that. Ultimately there is no human morality which can condemn this without special pleading.
Your feelings are not morality.

>>18520054
There’s nothing with keeping virgin girls for yourself.
Virgin boys are of the enemy and will only spread the enemy’s character and genes among your own people.
Virgin girls birth your people and can be imprinted upon.
Where’s the problem?
>how do they know
It’s called a hymen
>it’s heckin not wholesome chungus
Unironically raiding for virgins is far far less ugly than the SupremeGentleman/BonnieBlue dichotomy we have currently.

You call it sick, but what’s the alternative?
Something far uglier, what we live in today.

>>18520582
Because the people that do as you describe stop being christian. If the bible is just retarded jewish nonsense, then so is all of christianity and you may as well just be a deist or something. And hey, wouldn't you know it, once people could actually read the bible there was a huge uptick in exactly that. All remaining christians are slaves who value jewish supremacy above all else. If they reject the bible they lose the jewish whip across their back and the jewish yoke across their neck. Which to them means losing everything they have ever been and could ever be.

>>18520383
If a Druid polymorphs into a bear, is it bestiality??
Nonsensical questions will elicit nonsensical answers.
>your answers are le crazy that means your whole religion is crazy
Contemptible debate strategy.

>>18520688
>You call it sick, but what’s the alternative?
>Something far uglier, what we live in today.
That's not how it works, Islam is always open.

>>18520693
Ok but the criticisms of the Bible made in this thread are silly and juvenile and unserious, it’s a literary equivalent to Pedo-Hunters.

>>18520009
>the deranged mind of an atheist on full display

>>18520383
>If God commands you to have sex with children
That's a demon

>>18520698
>fealty to the bug eyed orcs and their magic rock
Yea no thanks. Drop a JDAM on Mlecha and Edema please

>>18520702
>the criticisms of the Bible made in this thread are silly and juvenile and unserious
Not really.

>>18520704
Anon, there are Christians literally fantasizing about fucking children in this very thread. Who's the one deranged?

>>18520704
Buddy, that quote comes from the bible.

>>18520702
>I can't wait for the jews to kill my infant son and rape my infant daughter
>thay would be such an honor
>I hope they let me watch before killing me too
>I'll be so excited to meet their god upon his throne of foreskins and thank him for such a privilege

>>18520721
this is literally what the average Christian wants you to believe in btw

>>18520009
this is legitimately less bloodthirsty than what Israel's doing today, where they blow up the little girls too

>>18520682
as you are asked every time this thread comes up, why can the male virgins not be "imprinted upon" but the female ones can?
the only form of morality that cannot condemn this is christian morality, literally everyone else is comfortable with saying "taking virgin girls as sex slaves is bad"

Marcion of Sinope was right

File: 1751111356804369.png (305 KB, 1018x1034)

305 KB PNG

>>18520682
>They’re not raping the infants. They’re keeping virgin females because virgin females can be imprinted upon.
The Hebrew word used is literally consume, it's a known expression for sexual intercourse. Anyway the bible makes it clear what happens to captured female prisoners of war, they get raped and it's all good according to your "divine" law. The only ones denying this are christcucks who are ashamed of their satanic religion. Male children can also be imprinted upon, they don't even have to know they are adopted if they are young enough.
>hurr someone else uses the same argument based on verses found in one of the most popular books ever therefore you are one and the same
It's a shame it isn't known even more commonly. But what can you expect since the members of this cult never open their own book.
>>18520688
>Christian understanding of genetics
lmao, both males and females pass genes among your own people. In fact females pass more genes than a male per child because of mtDNA and the fact that the X chromosome is way larger than the Y (in the case of a male child)
>It’s called a hymen
Okay but how do they check hymen status? Do they make a soldier spread the innocent girls legs apart or what?
>You call it sick, but what’s the alternative?
How about you don't commit atrocities?

>>18520741
Jesus disagrees

>>18520751
Jesus thought the earth was flat.

>>18520741
>jesus wasn't actually quoting the old testament constantly, his apostles were just too stupid and jewish to understand what he was saying
>paul is the only true apostle
Honestly based

>>18520735
>the only form of morality that cannot condemn this is christian morality
Obviously jew "morality" is fine with it too. It's their book. Presumably muslims are fine with it too since they, like christians, saw jews in all of their evil and thought "we should be more like them". To worship a god is to try and draw closer to them, to become more like them. And all of these "people" worship typhon-yahweh, devourer of foreskins.

>>18520757
So?

>>18520721
Who are you quoting? Obviously the people at war with the jews don’t want to lose to them. Just like Christians today in Palestine fighting the jews don’t want to lose to them.
>>18520735
>as you
This is my first time in this thread.
>why can’t males
Because males don’t pairbond like females do.
Men can still pairbond but it’s much weaker and besides, no group wants foreign males taking their women. The male is the head of the household, if you have a bunch of hostile households from hostile men who have a grudge because they retain their sense of distinction (as they haven’t pairbonded to a man and thus been sublimated to the household of Israel) then your nation is torn asunder.

Are you not aware of sexual dynamics?
>cannot condemn this
Who condemns it?
Norse do not. Greeks do not. Nor do the Latins. Neither do Tengrists or Muds.
Who’s condemning it?

Females can fall in line through pairbonding.
Males cannot. That is why everyone throughout history has always been more likely to spare female virgins than male virgins.
>sex slaves
You make it sound like they were chained in a basement and raped.
This is not what happened. They were married off or more rarely given as concubines. This was a common practice throughout history and it seems women get off to this. Women even get off to the rape dungeon.

If it’s aligned with female nature, sexual nature, well, what’s the problem here?

>>18520819
>Because males don’t pairbond like females do.
Females don't pair bond. That's not a thing

>>18520819
>the people at war with the jews
That's all of humanity. Your loyalty will be rewarded by you getting to enjoy recieving the atrocities you defend at the hands of those you worship.
>Because males don’t pairbond like females do
A castrated feminist is more of a man than you.

>>18520749
>a known expression for sex
They are being kept for sex yes, there’s some other purpose to women beyond reproduction? I haven’t heard of it.
>they get raped
They’re not getting violently held down and violated, that’s what women want. They’re getting paired off as concubines or wives. Which women also want but want less than being violently filled in their filthy holes.
>denying this
Literally no one is denying this.
>male children can be imprinted upon
NO THEY CAN NOT
Women become subjects of the husband.
The males would not become subjects of their wives.
They would become leaders of a house which has reason to be hostile. They cannot allow this.
Furthermore men do not pairbond as women do.
When men pairbond, the power dynamic is them magnetizing a woman to them.
Not the reverse. Women follow the men.
So you want the men in the tribe to all be of your kin.
No man wants to see his women taken by foreign males.
No man has a problem with foreign women being taken by his own males.

What part of this don’t you understand?
>both males and females pass genes
Ok and?
So do the mentally ill, yet we do not want mental illness in the genepool.
>how do they check the hymen status
How the fuck do you think?
>NOOOO THINK OF THE BABY GIRL BEING HYMEN CHECKED
You are a feminist.
>don’t commit atrocities
I haven’t, neither did the Hebrews.
Where are the atrocities?
>>18520757
Did he actually? I thought it was common in the post Alexander world that everyone knew the world was round and the earth revolved around the sun.

>>18520835
>denying reality
Ok so you’re just unserious.

It’s obvious. Everyone honest will tell you.
The first time is the most meaningful and most special time.
Weird slut pushers and feminists will try to say the past doesn’t matter.
It obviously does.
Love is a drug, it’s dopamine, and if you have too many unique partners you build up a tolerance to that drug to any individual partner.
>but where’s the science
The data we have is what we’d expect to see if this were true. For example divorce rates and sexual satisfaction in relationships.
One-partner or “virgin”/“pairbonded” couples report much higher satisfaction rates than others.

Academia suppressed genetic science and race and IQ for decades, in fact they’re still doing it.
I am only prefacing this to say that academia being suspiciously quiet about a topic does not mean that topic is nonsense or pseudo-science.

Pairbonding is a thing. It has practical evidence. It has historical evidence.
It is the natural inclination of humans.

I mean your best argument against pairbonding would be that God actually does exist and he’s just being unnecessarily cruel. As opposed to the other argument which is that God may or may not exist and the Israelites were using God to justify the natural sexual tribalism that all people engaged in but now they had divine mandate behind it.

>>18520844
Nonsensical. The ancient Hebrews aren’t even around anymore and modern Jews are Turbo feminists who’s religion at present has completely inverted the old tribal sensibility of the primacy of the father’s lineage.

>>18520819
>Because males don’t pairbond like females do.
everything about this is nonsense
>no group wants foreign males taking their women.
who cares what they want, we're talking about what god commanded them to do. god regularly commands people to do the opposite of what they want. there are other verses where he tells the israelites to integrate foreigners, such as Deuteronomy 31:12-13. here he explicitly tells them to kill everyone and take slaves
>Norse do not. Greeks do not. Nor do the Latins. Neither do Tengrists or Muds.
go ahead and ask a group of normal people in real life if they think taking(virgin) girls as sex slaves is cool or not and report back
>Females can fall in line through pairbonding.
>Males cannot. That is why everyone throughout history has always been more likely to spare female virgins than male virgins
no they have been more likely to spare girls and women because they aren't interested in taking the male as sex slaves
>You make it sound like they were chained in a basement and raped.
>This is not what happened. They were married off or more rarely given as concubines
i'm not making it sound like anything other than what it was. they were forced into marriages by their conquerors after their families had been slaughtered. they were slaves.

>>18520877
>jews are Turbo feminists
Just like you, who advocates for murdering infant boys but sparing girls. I wonder. When the "totally not the real jews anymore" do it to you, will you ever realize the error of your ways? I assume not.

>>18520024
>God was being realistic.
Why can't God change reality?

>>18520931
I thought I was advocating for rape

>>18520886
>nonsense
Explain. Pairbonding makes sense with our model of female psychology.
>God said to kill everyone this other time
And?
If they are commanded to wipe out an evil and wicked people then they would do so, if a people are evil beyond redemption. Well what’s the problem?
>ask a group of normal people
Who?
I have asked Christians who are the normal demographic in my country if the believe God is good, they say yes.
>is cool or not and report back
They all agree. The Israelites were in the right.
Are you talking about liberals?
Life denying liberals hate Israelites for the same reason they hate Vikings and Zeus.
>they are more likely to spare girls because they don’t want boys as sex slaves
1. This is what I have been fucking telling you.
2. They aren’t sex slaves. They’re concubines.
You make it sound like they’re tied up in ISO containers. These are tribesmen, not mapuchim subhumanoid muzdogs or pakis.
These women were married off or given to men in the tribes.
They had similar or identical social status to Israeli women.
>anything other than what it was
You mean the practice which ALL tribal societies participated in and some still do today ritually if not literally?

Dude, you’re a liberal. Just say it. Just come out and say it.
I have no problem with taking virgin girls as spoils because they can be grafted into the tribe because girls are malleable in ways boys aren’t.
People talk about this today with women having the opinions of the last dick they rode.
Men aren’t like that, men retain old loyalties in ways women do not.
Virgin girls can be pairbond and thus grafted into the tribe.
>BUT DA SEX
Yeah people have sex when they get married or paired off, get over it.
>SLAVERY!!!!
ALL women were slaves you moron.
Look at what women’s liberation has wrought. No one is better off for it least of all women.

You think the SSRI epidemic is good?
Women must be slaves.
Girls being spared because they are useful is a mercy.

>>18521168
>Dude, you’re a liberal
He's not the radical feminist talking about exterminating boys and only boys.

wtf is this thread

>taking war brides is bad because
Because why?
It does not adhere to a modern liberal code of ethics?
Is that why?
The world of 2500 BC is too illiberal for you?
I am guessing Rome, Athens, Sparta, also too illiberal yes?
They had warbrides. They had slaves.
Are we to say everything they believed was wrong and absurd?

Look at what liberalism, the accuser of these ancient peoples has wrought.
Niggers are everywhere.
Ugliness is everywhere.
Music sucks.
Art sucks.
The brutal events in human history fought in the name of liberal progress. For the cult of progressing to a more liberal world these modern bugs will swarm over everything. Nothing is too sacred to be torn down. No tactic or strategy too unscrupulous too immoral for them to use. They will never say “that’s enough, blood, not even our utopian vision is worth that much.”
Look at the source for the moral criticism of the biblical conquest of Canaan.

It’s ugly bugs who fill the world with hatred and ugliness. Literal orcs who delight the destruction of the strong and the beautiful.

>da joos
Yes joos le bad. But we should dislike jewish behavior when it is genuinely bad, such as when it’s feminist. Not when it’s based.
Fucking pizza delivery goys hate Israel because it’s hurting le heckin brown clowns.
They don’t dislike Israel for being the racial enemy of Whites. They hate them because they’re genociding shitskins.
It’s like hey, idiot! WE SHOULD BE GENOCIDING SHITSKINS!

>>18521183
Who is?
No one is talking about exterminating boys. I am saying it’s perfectly understandable to wipe out another tribe’s males and take their women for ourselves.
Why wouldn’t I pursue a ruthless haplogroup monopoly for my specific paternal lineage?

>>18521193
>No one is talking about exterminating boys.
You have consistently advocated for this throughout the entire thread. As does the prophet of your man hating feminist "god" in the quoted passage in the OP. Who also commands the genital mutilation of boys and only boys.
And you don't get to pretend you give a shit about genetics while openly defending and advocating for miscegenation.

>>18520718
>christcuck accidentally reveals he never reads the bible

You love to see it

>>18521209
Where did I advocate for exterminating all boys?
Where did anyone in the thread say 100% of boys should die?
No one said this. You’re making a strawman because you cannot argue the facts.
>you don’t get to
Oh there it is. It’s a shitlib screeching about Christianity, it can’t imagine arguing with someone who isn’t a liberal so it’s shortcircuits lmfao.

1. It’s not miscegenation. They’re all Semites.
2. It’s not that we care about racial genetics you ape. It’s that patrilineal tribal societies take women as spoils and enslave or kill males.
3. You can be pro race mixing and still “give a shit about genetics” such as haplogroups.
And who’s “You”? Am I in ancient Israel fighting these battles and taking virgin girls.
God, unironically give me a virgin teenage girl, make her a redhead and give me a battle to win to win her as spoils.

I wish brother I wish.

>genital mutilation
Yes the famously feminist societies of Islam and African tribes.
Circumcision isn’t even being argued about in the thread. And it has nothing to do with being male as much as it has to do with religious symbolism.

>>18521231
>is a literal cuck liberal
>calling others cuck
At least the pagans have balls and their complaints are that Christianity isn’t masculine enough, not that “NOOOO THE PRECIOUS WOMEN ARE BEING HECKIN SA’D”

>>18521245
>Odin drinks cum
>Ulysses cries like a 10-year-old girl
>Gilgamesh buttfucked a half-goat retard baby
>Atum created the world by gooning
>Amaterasu is a stripper
Huh?

>>18521242
>Where did anyone in the thread say 100% of boys should die?
>Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones
Which you continue to defend.
>circumcision isn’t even being argued about in the thread
The same "god" that demands the slaughter of boys specifically also demanding the mutilation of boys specifically is extremely relevant. You call me a liberal while getting on your hands and knees and licking the feet of a donkey headed sand fiend that hates happy, healthy male children more than anything else in this universe.

>>18521272
>(((David Green))) myth
Not reading the rest of your post, pseud.
>>18521273
>kill every male among the little ones
>which you defend
You are not arguing in good faith. Nowhere does this advocate for the death of all males, it is talking about the subgroup of males of a defeated tribe.

God loves happy healthy male children, otherwise he would have ordered the death of all Israelite males too.

You made a shitty thread. You argue in bad faith. You have some chip on your shoulder about Christianity/Judaism.
You ignore the clear counter arguments or pretend not to understand them e.g. “uhhh her past doesn’t matter bro xddd”.
You aren’t serious.
You’re a waste of time.

>>18521295
>it is talking about the subgroup of males of a defeated tribe
It is the explicit, stated purpose of all jews to subjugate all other peoples. Every single jew that has ever lived or ever will live desires nothing more than to slaughter every single Gentile infant boy that they can. And if typhon-yahweh loved happy, healthy male children then he would not have made it his single most important covenant for his spawn to flay their own sons' genitals.
>You made a shitty thread.
I'm not the OP, you subhuman nigger retard. There is far more than one person in this world that has grown tired of you and your masters.

>>18521184
>wtf is this thread
man hating paedo christcuck feminists justifying the slaughter of male children and the rape of girls. this is just what they have to do to keep believing in this evil nonsense

>>18521168
>Explain. Pairbonding makes sense with our model of female psychology.
you have no knowledge of psychology
>If they are commanded to wipe out an evil and wicked people then they would do so, if a people are evil beyond redemption. Well what’s the problem?
you are one(1) revelation away from a school shooting. curiously you did not respond to the other times in the bible where god did not think killing everyone outside of your "tribe" was necessary.
>I have asked Christians who are the normal demographic in my country if the believe God is good, they say yes.
did you ask them about the sex slavery.
>2. They aren’t sex slaves. They’re concubines.
>You make it sound like they’re tied up in ISO containers.
"uhh they aren't sex slaves, they're just female slaves who are forced into marriages, totally different". slavery doesn't require you be tied up.
>I have no problem with taking virgin girls as spoils
so they are spoils?
>Women must be slaves.
no idea why you are arguing about this if you think enslaving them would be good regardless of god commanding it and would likewise have no problem taking them as "spoils" again with or without god's command.
>Dude, you’re a liberal. Just say it. Just come out and say it.
hell yeah dude. bad news for you if thinking slavery is bad the vast majority of people in the developed and secular world(the most successful parts btw) are liberals

File: 1757526877245401.png (146 KB, 543x797)

146 KB PNG

>>18520846
>being violently filled in their filthy holes
This is how christcucks talk about the rape of children. Truly the most disgusting religion on the planet. It's very clear that rape is the method used here and you're denying it because your feminist sensibilities considers rape to be the worst possible thing that cannot be matched by anything else. Completely ignoring the fact that you are advocating for murder of innocent male children in the same breath.
>NO THEY CAN NOT
So males cannot learn? It happened to you when you decided to worship a middle eastern man.
>So do the mentally ill, yet we do not want mental illness in the genepool
Your entire argument was that somehow this was done to enable genetic purity. And I showed you that females pass more genetic material to the offspring so if you want that goal you should do the exact opposite.
>How the fuck do you think?
Well tell me, explain in detail how the hymen status got checked by those soldiers. The very act alone involves "getting violently held down and violated". The reason you are avoiding to answer is because you know how bad it makes your twisted death cult look
>Where are the atrocities?
I see so if the same were to happen to your people you'd be completely okay with it

>>18521295
>WAAAA WAAAA IM TOO AFRAID TO ADDRESS YOUR ARGUMENTS
Another crushing defeat for /pol/.

So the bible says to kill all the males and rape all the females and this is being defended for some reason?

>>18521316
>headcanon about jewish world conquest
Shifting the goalposts. Very nice.
However you’re still wrong about healthy males. If God wanted all healthy males dead then he would have the Israelites kill their own healthy males.
Plus I feel like this isn’t in accordance with the New Testament. If you’re going to accuse the Jews of an explicit mission to dominate the world. Ok but that isn’t God’s doing. According to the story the Jews have broken with God (again) and the canonical version of Christianity is that gentiles and jews are both to be saved.
>flay their sons genitals
What does this mean? No one does this.
If you mean circumcision that’s silly because people outside of Judaism and even outside of Eurasia also practice circumcision.
The Southern African practice of Imbalu is not evidence of a grand conspiracy against boys and men.

You have such vitriol and poison in your words. You must be mentally ill.

>>18521321
>pedo
its not pedophilia to have teenage girls.
We dont even know the age of consummation, maybe it was 45 - the modern liberal standard for aoc.
>christcuck
What does this even mean? These are archaic Hebrews who's specific defining characteristic throughout the entire Bible is they reject God and Christ.
Christianity itself is based around a break with the traditional mode of Judaism.
>feminists
Were the Yamnaya feminists? They also, as we have found from mass graves, slaughtered the men and older women, and absent from the graves are little girls.
>they killed the men and took the women
yeah, based, that's Aryan coded, thats tribalism. That's what people in the ancient world did.
>evil nonsense

You think your Yamnaya ancestors are evil....?
wait, are you White?

>>18521386
>you dont know female psychology
>one of their best sellers after the Bible itself is Morning Glory Milking farm
Its a book about a bull-man with a huge cock who forcefully and then gently wins over a millennial woman coerced into sexually servicing literal man-bull hybrids to survive.

What the fuck are you talking about female psychology for? I am right. Women's psychology is hard-wired to be into this bronze age tier sexual fantasy if not hard-wired into pre-historic hypergamy where she's being raped by 50 neanderthal/proto-human/sub-human creatures.

>you will shoot up a school
Unironically female behavior is the primary cause of school shooting. The gynocracy has created many mentally ill boys who need roughness and conflict like what you see in the Bible and they go crazy living in the liberal world 'your' thinking created.
Eliot Rodger being the quintessential example.

>did you ask them about sex slavery
yes, they do not hate their Yamnaya fathers nor the historical Israelites for practicing """"""sex slavery"""""

>tied up
it sort of does the way youre using it otherwise a woman would fit the definition of enslaved if she simply decides one day she doesnt like being married, she cant leave, she cant immediately get a divorce, in some cultures they do not recognize divorce and force the couple to remain together.

You would call this slavery though it is clearly not an african on a plantation or a Mamluk in an Abbasid penal horde.

>they are spoils
yes... no one ever said otherwise.

>>18521386
>enslaving them would be good
I am arguing this because it is very dishonest the way you are portraying slavery and women taken as spoils.
>you would have no problem with taking them as spoils with or without God's command
I dont have a problem with them being taken as spoils with or without God's command.

It might be unfortunate for them, but do you also weep for the numerous Neolithics ground under heel by the Yamnaya? I dont.
What of the Romans who were pillaged by Gauls and Goths?
I also do not waste my time lamenting these things. Evidently you do, why?
>the vast majority of people in the developed secular world
so less than 10% of the actual world then....
>most successful parts
You mean the Whitest parts.
>are liberals
Whites are liberals, and thats why White genocide is occurring and liberals are the ones facilitating it or failing to prevent it.
liberalism is life denying, it places the present moment of the individual above else, it discards family, it discords the sacred, it discards bonds of fellowship, beauty, majesty, nobility, it is emotional candy for institutionalized slave-morality.

Little in this world is more repellent than the maggot of liberalism.

>>18521392
>rape of children
pure headcanon.
You dont know if those foids are 4 or 45.
Where's your criticism of the Norse and the Greeks who also took slaves? Everything you said applies to them as well.
Why do you my people for living in their traditional way? Why do you hate the Corded Ware Tribes who gave birth to the great civilizations of the world?
>rape is the method used here
Where?
>rape and forced impregnation
1. That is really hot and women are really into that.
2. This is a practice The Aryan peoples of Europe must return to. Life was better when were horse riding raiders, born upon longships, great horns tearing the sky announcing our coming.
Nothing in the Bible suggests that is what was occurring btw. That is what I personally choose to believe because it is closest to the traditional Folkway of Europe's finest.
>murder of innocent male
who?
The ones in the Bible were guilty of wickedness.
the ones in Europe were born into the wrong race, just pajeets whom I also think we need to mow down, though not breed with.
>males cannot learn
learn?
learn??? Whos talking about learning?
I am talking about expanding my tribe's genetics.
I want MY tribe's haplotypes to expand, not theirs.
Why would we let their males reproduce when our males fought to prove them unworthy of reproduction??
>genetic purity?
no one said anything about genetic purity.
I said expanding my patrilineal line.
>females pass more genetic material
females do not pass the male haplogroup.
>explain how hymen status was checked
>this very act alone
You realize it is as simple as seeing one too young for sex and if one is too old telling her to bend over.
>NOOOOOO SHES BEING SA'D BY THEIR EYES INSPECTING HER PUSI WHICH IS FIRE BABY YOURE SO PRECIOUS
fuck off dumbass millennial cuck
>if the same happened to your people
Yeah, when MY people laid low another tribe, I completely and totally approve of us taking the girls and killing the males.
>I meant if your people lost
no one wants to lose lol

>>18521453
>/pol/
/pol/????
>arguments
What's the argument you're trying to make?
I think you should go to /pol/ to their pagan general and ask them about David Green's hitpiece on Odin.
>>18521466
We arent liberals so yeah we defend our males annihilating their males and their females becoming our wives.
This is what the Yamnaya did.

>>18521688
>>one of their best sellers after the Bible itself is Morning Glory Milking farm
weirdly when i look up "best selling books" the ones right after the bible are other religious texts like the quran and the book of mormon, and after those are popular fictional books like a tale of two cities, harry potter, and the hobbit, so again it looks like you either don't know what you are talking about or are having some sort of delusional episode, possibly both
>The gynocracy has created many mentally ill boys who need roughness and conflict like what you see in the Bible
this doesn't really track either since according to you men and boys "need" to be violent, the violence in the bible is their natural state, so i don't know what the "gynocracy" has to do with it
>it sort of does the way youre using it
i am using slavery to mean "owning another person as property" because that is what the word means. you have already said it is fine to treat women this way and to take them as spoils of war(making them property) so you don't seem to actually disagree with this, you just know normal people think slavery is bad(correctly) and thus feel compelled to argue the bible isn't condoning it, while mysteriously arguing it would be fine if it did.
>I also do not waste my time lamenting these things.
but you do spend your time defending them and arguing that they should still be practiced
>so less than 10% of the actual world then....
so go live in africa then if living like a bronze age peasant sounds appealing to you

the jewish god of vengeance and jealousy is different from the God of mercy and forgiveness

>>18521780
>when I look up best selling books
That is weird because no one said best sellers of men and women, I said "their" as in among women.
smut is among the most widely bought by women behind The Bible.
Mormons dont buy the book of Mormon either, they give them out like candy.
This makes me think you literally just made that up and didnt actually google "best selling books to women".
Anyway, you're trying to avoid the unambiguous fact women are way more sexually degenerate than men, and your "oh no think of da women" is a uniquely male perspective.
>this doesnt really track
how?
Men and boys DO need violence, they need to be competitive, they need an outlet for physical energy.
>the violence in the bible is their natural state
yes.
>I dont know what gynocracy has to do with it
?????
We live in a gynocracy, we today, live in one.
Those in the Bible did not.
The gynocracy created the mental illness. In the Bronze Age men were in a healthier state and had more outlets.
>owning another person as property
ok well then for most of human history women and children constituted slaves.
That to me seems silly because most people think of field coons being whipped into hitting cotton quotas when they hear "slavery".
So, just to be clear, we agree on using the term 'slavery' with the understanding it was a common, moral, and justifiable practice that was widespread across human history"?

I dont think the natural emergent dynamics of human social organization, such as "slavery" were ineffective or deeply immoral.
Why do you?
What is your problem with 90% of humanity?
>you just know normal people
who?
most of the world is brown, violent, low IQ, illiberal, living with Bronze Age views.
"normal" people are not liberals. liberals are a vanishingly small minority globally and a minority in White countries and concentrated typically among women and those with high mutational loads.

Sane, mentally sound, successful people are overwhelmingly in favor what (You) call slavery.

>>18521780
>feel compelled to argue the Bible isnt condoning it
????????????
no one has a problem with traditional social dynamics, its literally just you and other mentally ill people such as Western liberals who have as a group higher rates of schizophrenia, sociopathy, and genetic mutations.
Like its literally just you complaining because you're a mutant unable to adjust to common human norms.
>arguing it would be fine
it was, and still is, fine.

Look at the civilizations it produced.
Then look at how the destruction liberalism has wrought.
If women are given power over men, which is all female emancipation is, they destroy everything, theyre a force of nature, its like letting the fuel leak out of the engine, an otherwise effective system becomes an ecological catastrophe.
>you spend your time defending them
??????????
yeah its easy to say "no I dont think 99% of my ancestors were evil, heres why"
what dont you get?
>go live in Africa
but I am not African.
I want to live among Anglo-Americans who have bronze age ideas.
FYI, peasants were a minority in history, the vast majority of human history took place outside of Medieval Western Europe.

I would be apart of the Fyrd, a Burgher, or a Bondi.
I would greatly prefer my people return to their traditional mode of living.
Sadly we must first purge the mental illness from our ranks, people like (You).
>>18521794
That's not in the official lore.

>>18522022
>That is weird because no one said best sellers of men and women, I said "their" as in among women.
>smut is among the most widely bought by women behind The Bible.
women buy more books than men to begin with. if this is your metric then when i search "best selling books to women" the bible doesn't come up at all, it is a mixture of fiction of different genres
>Anyway, you're trying to avoid the unambiguous fact women are way more sexually degenerate than men
you have been arguing rape is fine all day so i don't think this is true
>The gynocracy created the mental illness. In the Bronze Age men were in a healthier state and had more outlets.
but according to you the healthier state involved killing entire groups of people and taking their women as sex slaves, so i'm not sure how this is healthier than shooting up a school. it seems like both of them should be fine for you.
>That to me seems silly because most people think of field coons being whipped into hitting cotton quotas when they hear "slavery".
maybe that's what you think it means because you're an idiot, but the word does not mean exclusively "africans brought to the southern united states"
>most of the world is brown, violent, low IQ, illiberal, living with Bronze Age views.
>"normal" people are not liberals. liberals are a vanishingly small minority globally and a minority in White countries and concentrated typically among women and those with high mutational loads.
>Sane, mentally sound, successful people are overwhelmingly in favor what (You) call slavery.
so the violent, low iq people living with bronze age views are also sane, mentally sound, and successful?
>I want to live among Anglo-Americans who have bronze age ideas.
well that is unfortunate because anglo-americans are overwhelmingly liberal by the standards of even 100 years ago and would think you are an insane person. your views are in fact probably more regressive than any functioning non-tribal society.

File: BUENO.jpg (12 KB, 225x225)

12 KB JPG

>>18520009
>Take your sickle and reap, because the time to reap has come
Pun nintendo?

>>18522105
>I don’t think this is true
But it’s obviously true. Women are much more depraved than men.
>you’ve been arguing for rape
Not rape to groom.
>but according to you
???
There’s no but. I’m right.
Bronze Age produced healthier people physically and mentally and a contributing factor to that was group conflict, the power process.
>I am not sure how killing a foreign tribe is healthier than killing your own tribe
?????
How? Like how are you unsure about this?
>the word technically
Dude shut the fuck up.
Traditional marriage norms fit your definition of slavery, therefore I find your definition too liberal and functionally useless.
>so low iq violent Bronze Age people are healthy
YES!
The problem of the modern world is Whites have become unhealthy, Whites have unlearned the lessons of history. Now Whites suffer for it.
>Anglo Americans are liberals
Anglo Americans banned women from having money (in banks) until 1970 please shut the fuck up.
>regressive
My views are progressive actually. I do not want us to regress into tabula baby thinking.
We need to be adults.

You have clearly lost and now you engage in open pedantry.

Shitty thread. Liberals are retarded.

>>18521674
>its not pedophilia to have teenage girls.
Oh so its actually called Ephebophilia...does it make it any better? Imagine a bunch of Jeets killing you and raping your teenage daughter does it make it better that its technically not pedophilia but actually Ephebophilia?

>>18521674
>yeah, based, that's Aryan coded, thats tribalism. That's what people in the ancient world did.
That's what niggers will do to you.

>>18522290
>We need to be adults.
nah raping teenagers is kikery and you're a kike for defending it.

>>18522299
>Yamnaya are kikes
>Spartans are kikes
>Vikings are kikes
Why are you like this?

>>18522297
How are niggers going to do this? They can’t even organize a functional state let alone a large scale army capable of broad front offensives.
Niggers will have dance offs and eat mud.
Whites will become ever more like their Norsemen ancestors.
Rubberbanding.

File: 7c9i1i.png (86 KB, 423x524)

86 KB PNG

>>18520009
> kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him
based based based

>>18522296
Jeets killing and raping is bad because they’re jeets you dumb ape.
I have no problem with my people killing and raping teenagers, that’s what my ancestors the Aryans did, the Vikings, the Goths.
I won’t counter signal things my ancestors did. I don’t give a fuck and I think it was fucking cool.

File: 1780546000231270.png (129 KB, 537x775)

129 KB PNG

>>18521708
Nope it's established fact and no chriscuck has been able to refute the arguments presented.
>Everything you said applies to them as well
Idolatry also applies to them as well so you must think it's based then.
>actually believes innocent children find his twisted desires "really hot"
Yes I knew you were a sick fuck
>The ones in the Bible were guilty of wickedness
Ah yes the classical feminist position where males are born wicked and inherently worthy of destruction but females are pure angels who deserve to be protected by Chad. btw the bible says Eve was the one who sinned
>I am talking about expanding my tribe's genetics
Your tribe's genetics will be diluted more since as shown female contribute more genetic material.
>b-but what about haplogroups!
Nothing special about it. But let me get this straight, you'd consider a south asian your racial brother if he shares the same patrilineal line?
>bend over
So you've never seen a woman naked before or does your sister wear a speculum at all times?
>no one wants to lose lol
but when you do lose no bitching an moaning since this is the standard you want to live by

>>18520041
>I can't refute that anon so I'll call him crazy

>>18521272
>Muhammad fucked an 8 year old
>Mary supposedly was a virgin but gave birth, it's a miracle not Mary secretly cheating on her husband
>Jews used to clean the blood from a briss with their mouths
We can go all day buddy

>>18522937
>refute my schizophrenia
I literally can't. Your lived experience is heckin' valid, sis.

This thread is atrocious
There is nothing that inspires greater joy than knowing that every single christian, jew, and muslim is going to be completely eradicated and exterminated by automated kill-drones in the very near future.

>>18522941
>used to

>>18522290
>Not rape to groom.
"i want to groom children not rape them" oh ok
>>18522290
>Bronze Age produced healthier people physically and mentally and a contributing factor to that was group conflict, the power process.
life expectancy was 26 years old
>>the word technically
it's not technically it's literally what the word means
>>so low iq violent Bronze Age people are healthy
i didn't ask you if they were healthy, i asked you if they were "sane, mentally sound, and successful". you actually already acknowledged that the developed and secular parts of the world are the most successful so not sure how you square this
>Anglo Americans banned women from having money (in banks) until 1970 please shut the fuck up.
kind of concerned you don't know what year it is currently. the society of 1970 was also substantially more liberal(read: modern) than the bronze age thunderdome you think is ideal. women could vote in 1970.
>Shitty thread. Liberals are retarded.
seething

>>18523070
>life expectancy was 26 years old
let me guess ... AVERAGE life expectancy ?

so probably more like 60 if we ignore all the dead children

File: 1616535650555.jpg (96 KB, 378x364)

96 KB JPG

>>18520009
That is not what I would expect the omniscient and omnipotent source of all reality that exists outside of space and time to say. That sounds suspiciously like what a bronze age tribe would say their god said, if they were just lying to justify what they were going to do anyway.

>>18523339
>That sounds suspiciously like what a bronze age tribe would say
does it?

why do they only kill the young men
why do they kill the roasties
why don't they just rape everyone?

>>18523349
>why kill the threats and the std ridden used goods
Maybe their leader thought about it for more than 10 seconds? Sounds more likely than divine intervention.

>>18523361
but why not kill the old males as well?

good point about the STDs though

>>18523395
Killing the older males is already implied since that is who always dies in battles. But it is unusual to attack women or children so this verse was a special instruction to also kill the women and male children but kidnap the female children. The word used in the original Hebrew means child by the way.

Why did they not rape everyone? Because Jews and many people think that homosexuality is gross and the ancient Jewish community would kill gays because they thought it was yucky. They also believed women who lost their virginity were gross whores and used goods. This is why ancient Jews like even King David had child brides. They are sick freaks and the OT is evil. But the Gospel has Good morals which is why Christianity is far superior to Judaism which replaces the NT with the morally inferior Talmud lol.

File: 1683738734596445.jpg (7 KB, 249x249)

7 KB JPG

>>18520009
How does an atheist object to this without invoking religion or personal preference?

>>18524024
the golden rule, which was not invented by christianity btw. People who say there would be no morality without religion are just telling on themselves that they have no inborn sense of morality

>>18524024
>rational empathy doesn't exist
>I only refrain from murdering and raping because I was given explicit instructions from my imaginary friend
Thanks for the insight into the religious mind. You lot should be locked up.

>>18524034
>>18524024
Atheist morality is just Utilitarian morality, which is pretty much the moral framework of the modern world. Religion isn't strictly required for this.

>>18524034
>Invokes religion
>>18524036
>Invokes personal preference
>>18524037
>Invokes personal preference

File: 3y1hde.jpg (10 KB, 250x205)

10 KB JPG

>>18524038
How is utilitarian morality evoking personal preference?

>>18524040
Because utilitarianism is what a group of people arbitrarily decided is "good"