[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now closed. Thanks to all who applied!


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Numbers 31:17-18 Now therefore kill every male child, and kill every woman that is not a virgin. But kidnap all the female children alive for yourselves.

Why is YHWH so evil tho lol.
>>
>not the KJV (correct) translation
>>
>>18522793
It's not evil to kill and rape on YHWH's command, ok? He made you, so he is free to tell his followers to rape you.
>>
>>18522793
Tell us your moral system, so that we may compare the two against each other.
>>
>>18522816
Commandment 1: Don't rape and genocide
>>
>>18522824
How is that different than "Do not kill." and "Do not commit adultery."?
>>
>>18522825
Those only apply to jews. You are free to kill and rape gentiles according to Yhwh.
>>
>>18522816
tu quoque fallacy. internal critique is a valid argument that christianity fails in this case, since your answer to op basically resolves into christianity being authority worship.
>>
>>18522824
What do you do to people who rape and genocide?
>>
>>18522914
Yeah, and that's a bad thing because.... it just is. OKAY!?
>>
>>18523380
Pretending to be retarded when you get called out is kinda boring man
>>
>>18522914
What is the critique? OP basically said it was evil, but he believes in the exact same morals. So, I guess by OP's own admission, he is also evil.
>>
>>18523389
OP here. I do not believe in those evil morals. Hope this helps. Lol.
>>
>>18523380
its bad because its a contradiction. the christian position is that its not just authority worship, that you have certain morals and standards, but when you get shown your own fake god contradicting the standards, having an answer that basically resolves into authority worship debunks the religion.
>>
>>18523397
Which morals do you not believe in?
>>
>>18523389
>>18523406
>>
>>18523389
>but he believes in the exact same morals
Where are you getting this idea from?
>>
>>18523397
Ok the Amelikites were basically Jeffrey Epsteining little kids, sacrificing them, and eating them. In addition to performing demonic rituals.
Gonna try to break it down in a way your reddit spacing invader like you can understand.
Assume you are Admin of a Minecraft server, and a clan of players is exploiting and banning other players using hacks. You tell your mods to ban this clan of players.
Are you in the wrong for banning them from YOUR server?
>>
>>18523406
>>18523415
>>
>>18523415
So... the moral here is that because Jeffrey Epstein was allegedly raping girls, you should kill his infant sons and rape his daughters?
>>
>>18523430
The Amelikites were cannibal, rapists, demoniacs. I know bear with me, in your worldview, this doesn't happen ever. But Jeffrey Epstein has been credibly accused of the same thing. As a point of clarification, they were ordered to be wiped out as punishment for these crimes. Not raped.
>>
>>18523437
You're a complete nut
>>
>>18523415
>>18523437
What crime did the Amalkites camels and donkeys do? The Bible even has a contradictory story about a talking donkey that teaches the reader not to harm innocent animals. Very contradictory morals. Lol.
>>
>>18523448
Ok, so this might also be hard to understand, but death isn't the end. Perhaps leaving them alive would have been more harmful to everyone involved.
>>
>>18523437
>The Amelikites were cannibal, rapists, demoniacs
their children didnt do these things yet. and your god supposedly doesnt punish people for the sins of their fathers,
nor police crimes that will happen in the future since that supposedly goes against free will,
nor are you allowed to say that some group of people are genetically evil, since that goes against the fact that god created everything god.

so whats the cope answer then?
>>
>>18523409
>Where are you getting this idea from?

>>18522824
>Commandment 1: Don't rape and genocide
>>
>>18523467
>ok now that we are pressed into a corner we can appeal to a state that we cant prove exists where all apparent contradictions will somehow be solved.
>>
>>18523471
See >>18522832
My commandment applies to everyone. Yahweh's commandment does not apply to gentiles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thou_shalt_not_kill
>Deuteronomy 20:10–18 establishes rules on killing civilians in warfare:
>the population of cities outside of the Promised Land, if they surrender, should be made tributaries and left alive (20:10–11)
>those cities outside of the Promised Land that resist should be besieged, and once they fall, the male population should be exterminated, but the women and children should be left alive (20:12–15)
of
>those cities that were within the Promised Land, however, everybody was to be killed.[11]
>>
>>18523468
It's the Final Judgment which all of us will face. Perhaps serves as a warning to you that you are responsible for your children's fate.
There is also an element of mystery involved that will not satisfy the dark matter enjoyers ironically. We see as through a glass darkly and cannot know that which isn't revealed to us.
The Amalekites were given time to repent, and did not. Those children were probably not judged as harshly as their parents were. Again death is not the end.
>>
>>18523486
>Perhaps serves as a warning to you that you are responsible for your children's fate
but you are not, since that would remove the free will of the child.

the rest of the response is restating the position and not an argument.
>>
>>18523484
So you believe that killing civilians in warfare is always wrong?
>>
>>18523497
Umm... Yes? Obviously?
>>
>>18523489
Where did I ever say God is bound to not remove anyone's "free will".
Your argument appears to be based on a misunderstanding of God. And only you can pray for clarity on that.
>>
>>18523505
Why is obviously wrong to kill civilians of a country you are at war with?
>>
>>18523508
>Where did I ever say God is bound to not remove anyone's "free will".
us having free will is a very basic belief of basically all christians, which is what im arguing against, if you have your own retarded headcannon then its already over.
>>
>>18523516
That counts as genocide so it follows from my commandment 1 that it's wrong.
>>
>>18523519
Killing civilians in war is wrong because you call it genocide and because you say genocide is wrong?
>>
>>18523536
I can guess what dumb word game you're trying to play but I won't play along, rape and genocide apologist.
>>
>>18523541
It's not a word game. I'm asking you to justify your beliefs.
>>
>>18523546
Fuck off
>>
>>18523549
You seem to be the one playing the word game sice you want to equivocate genocide with killing a civilian during war, and then saying that it's wrong because you say so, without any justification as to why.
>>
When Aryan beasts like John Underhill arrived in North America and carried out their just and morally correct duty by encircling Indian fortresses and burning them down and executing any Indian, man woman or child, who fled the inferno, he and other similar Aryan beasts would always cite the example of Amalek as their justification for why they were still good Christians kek.

I kind of like it. As Aryan beasts, their eyes glazed over for all the stuff in the bible about slave morality and the duty of the strong and healthy to uplift the weak and sick and all men being brothers. Then they got to the one chapter about the uncompromising destruction of an unworthy race, and their eyes lit up like they got the green light: "If you would please consult this passage, you'll see my genocide of barbaric Indian freaks doesn't make me a bad Christian"

The irony of course being that Amalek were Mycenaean Greeks and thus Aryan (although their blood was possibly as little as 1/10th Indo-European according to latest studies) and the Israelites were not.
>>
>>18523415
>Ok the Amelikites were basically Jeffrey Epsteining little kids, sacrificing them, and eating them. In addition to performing demonic rituals.
None of this is in the Bible btw, you are basically a pagan.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.