How do you respond without sounding mad?
>>18531480my fist coming into contact with your face is a blunt fact.
AHHHHHHH MY NAME IS BERTRAND RUSSELL AAHHHHHHHHH
>>18531486As is my bullet going through your skullNot an argument
>>18531480"You're correct, Bertrand."
>>18531487>You better agree with me or you're going to the demon ruins and lost izalithGet real dude
>>18531480>how do you respond to a statement with no intellectual content
>>18531480How does he know for sure?
>>18531480Based actually. Staring up at planets and stars is a waste of time
>>18531486>>18531487>>18531604LOL gigamad.
>>18531480>um actually, um, my imaginary friend is going to burn you in magic lava if you don't believe in him, so :)
Claims without evidence can just be dismissed without evidence. That's what I would say.
>>18531480Respond to what? The statement is just there, and that's all. Why would you project some kind of meaning into it? Just because you have subjective unverifiable feelings of words having meaning doesn't imply you get to claim it about others.
>>18531734On what evidence do you ground this claim?
>>18531748>80 iq retortYou can dismiss his claim but that doesn't him any less right about dismissing OP's brainlet quote.
>>18531752Source?
>>18531752>no evidence providedI'll promptly dismiss your demented babble then.
>>18531753See >>18531752. Imagine getting filtered by the same thing twice in a row.
>>18531755See >>18531752. Imagine getting filtered by the same thing twice in a row. Also kekt at 80 IQs being cookie cutter "people" with identical retarded thoughts.
>>18531756>>18531759bot's malfunctioning
>>18531748OP's quote made the claim. Neither OP's quote, nor OP provided any evidence or arguments for the claim.Therefore there is nothing to do but accept it or reject it on its face. It's a logical entailment, not a claim that I am making.
>>18531480I'll hug him and tell him you're absolutely right there's no meaning and no truth in this world
>>18531780Seethe harder, subhuman.
>another episode of christians claiming that if God isn't real then words have no meaningVery, very low IQ "people", these christians are.
>>18531784OP isn't the one bringing up Hitchen's razor. Miss me with this shit.
>>18531827>filtered
>>18531837Look, another nonsensical post with zero arguments!
>>18531875>projecting
>>18531784>Therefore there is nothing to do but accept it or reject it on its face. It's a logical entailment, not a claim that I am making.Low-IQ take.
Cool story.Too bad it doesn't say anything at all.Basically, A is A. And I have nothing more to add.That's the level of discussion.Effectively nothing interesting was said at all, it's a truism. One equals one, stop the presses.Deepest shit ever man.It's obvious he'd rather not think about that problem, pretend it simply isn't there.That's sad, because you'd think he'd know better. But sometimes highly educated people are willing to rationalize away enormous blind spots because the implications are unsettling to them.He's clearly emotionally attached to a certain analytic frame of reference.
>>18531604This.It's literally a waste of breath with effectively zero semantic content.It would have been less embarrassing for him to say, I don't know what you mean by "universe".>>18531707mad
>>18531480No, that's not all. How did the universe come to be? Why is it there?
>>18532641I don't know, and neither do you.
>>18532641Clearly a wizard must have made it in 7 days. This solution will neatly solve this issue once and for all.
