>infanticide:)>infanticide, religious ritualD:
>>18535788Basically everything is about skin color. Carthaginians were browner than Romans so it's worse when they do it
>>18535788It was more the human sacrifice than the infantcide. Rome was autistic about this, to the point they got weirded out when they realized they were tricked into doing it by killing a bunch druids even though they usually have no problem killing Celts en masse
>>18535788This is easily explained by the fact that your ancestors were mentally retarded
Funniest thing is when Christians root for Rome versus Carthage, when if anything Carthage's religion is closer to the Judaism of the Old Testament
>>18535793They justified fucking up the Celts and the Druids because they practiced human sacrifice (and then ritualistically strangled the Celtic leader to death in the temple of Jupiter, which definitely was NOT human sacrifice), and the Celts are whiter than Romans.
>>18535845Yes but now it's about skin color
>>18535788>murderCrickets>satanic ritual murderNational news
With how massive child mortality was in Antiquity, it really makes you wonder how Carthaginians could find enough extra babies to burn for Moloch's pleasure and what they did with the millions of bodies of children that died a natural death.
>>18535788>two priest-administrators set up an event of human gladiatorial sacrifice on their culture's most important holiday, the citizens are asked to attend in their best ritual garbOne of them is Aztec.
>>18535788If Romans practiced infantcide why wasn't Claudius killed at birth
>violent murder of hundreds of children during the sack of a settlement for no other reason beyond herd mentality-induced momentary bloodlustEh it sucks but what can you do, it's just the reality of war>sacrifice one child once every several months in a ritual you wholeheartedly believe will bring rain or whateverTHIS EVIL SUBHUMAN CULTURE MUST BE OBLITARED IMMEDIATELY I WILL STOP THEIR INFANTICIDAL WAYS BY KILLING A BUNCH OF THEIR CHILDREN (secularly)Why is greco-roman-christian civilization so autistic?
>>18535788While Greece might have practiced it during the Bronze Age (aka the period nobody cares about), it fell out of favor by the archaic and classical periods as the Greeks began to consider it barbaric and outdated.Rome hated human sacrifice with a passion and literally outlawed it around 200 BC
>>18535788Carthaginians were brown African shitskins, that's the difference.
>>18535788Human sacrifice was unironically a form of proto-eugenics. Practically all of the people sacrificed were dysgenic and notice how societies became more multicultural when the practice disappeared...If human sacrifice didn’t have a pagan religious overlay, then every /pol/tard on this board would be calling it based.
>>18537207Sacrifices in general required sacrifices that were of a good quality. No god would appreciate a sacrifice of a diseased bull. Human sacrifices could blur this a bit more than animal sacrifices because there were some human sacrifices that were really just ritualized executions of criminals. But for the ones that were more dedicated sacrifices without any ulterior motive, this norm still applied. You could justify using a captured enemy or something, but not culling the infirm. No god wants your sick, already dying baby as a sacrifice.So the only human sacrifices that were eugenic were the ones that were going to be happening anyway, with or without the sacrificial element. The rest were dysgenic.
>>18535833Carthaginians and Jews were part of the same post-bronze age collapse late-stage Aramaic speaking Mesopotamian culture described by Spengler and Wells.
>>18537199Carthaginians were Semites, not Africans. Different level of brownness.
>>18537207Not really, in the overwhelming majority of societies that practiced human sacrifice, particularly the ones that practiced it the most (Mesoamerica and Bronze Age China), it was basically just a flashy way of executing foreign enemy soldiers two thirds of the time and a genuine religious ritual that involved the death of an also likely foreign slave, neither of which were likely to influence your nation's genes. So unless you're arguing it was some "i scratch your back you scratch mine" arrangement in which everybody was making sure only the fittest people of the enemy nation got to breed, that's a stupid hypothesis
>>18537247Jewish niggers
>>18537306more like Jew-adjacent in the way that Americans are Anglo-adjacent.
>>18537207how can you call anyone a "/pol/tard" after giving such an infantile, stupid take
>>18535788And yet modern atheist infanticide has surpassed them all
