Who exactly are the Balkan Vlachs? Are they the orthodox Slav equivalent to Roma people also known pejoratively as the gypsies?
this is another balkanite circlejerk thread isn't it?t. new worlder
>>18539516these two look like gyppos
>>18539516https://youtu.be/T_fyMIL2Zhwhttps://youtu.be/ZwozSLas8DM
>Who exactly are the Balkan Vlachs?slavko boljanovic and luka boljanovic>Are they the orthodox Slav equivalent to Roma people also known pejoratively as the gypsies?yes they are, those 2 vlachs in the OP identify as serbs
>>18539543catchy tune
srbi so ciganivlasi so ciganiboljanovici so cigani
>>185395162x pic related.
>>18539516Vlachs stands for Wallachian... They're not Slavs, they're Romanian. And there's a lot of Gypsies in that group of people
>>18539866Funny how that looks like the average German / Nazi and not a Slav
>>18539516And I don't know why you're asking here, you can just read it online without waiting for answers... what's the point of this thread?>Vlach, also Wallachian and many other variants,[1] is a term and exonym used from the Middle Ages until the Modern Era to designate speakers of Eastern Romance languages living in Southeast Europe-south of the Danube (the Balkan peninsula) and north of the Danube.[2]Although it has also been used to name present-day Romanians, the term "Vlach" today refers primarily to speakers of the Eastern Romance languages who live south of the Danube, in Albania, Bulgaria, northern Greece, North Macedonia and eastern Serbia. These people include the ethnic groups of the Aromanians, the Megleno-Romanians and, in Serbia, the Timok Vlachs.[3] The term also became a synonym in the Balkans for the social category of shepherds,[4] and was also used for non-Romance-speaking rural Christians (mostly Orthodox), in recent times in Dalmatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina derogatively.[5] The term is also used to refer to the ethnographic group of Moravian Vlachs who speak a Slavic language but have Vlach origins, as well as for Morlachs and Istro-Romanians. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs
>>18539896Completely delusional Slav and quite possibly Serb Untermensch mongrel detected.
>>18539905Sounds like you're op making retarded threads, to ask if Vlachs are Slavs... when a simple google search will tell you they speak Eastern Romance languages and was just a synonym for Wallachian... They have nothing to do with Slavs despite being a minority in a bunch of balkan countries
>>18539905Which begs the question as to why even make this thread, you didn't receive a single answer in 6 hours before I replied, and it's not some niche, esoteric knowledge you can't just google, sounds like you just want to bait
>>18539913>>18539916Sounds like I hit the right chord with my Untermensch pic as I'm not the OP. Also, only a complete cretin would ask why did OP made a general question about a certain ethnic group on a board dedicated to that and answer with a Wikipedia excerpt. Off yourself subhuman Slav trash, off yourself twice if you are a Serb Untermensch.
>>18539926This board is in fact not dedicated to discussing ethnic groups, it's dedicated to discussing history, which can sometimes pertain to ethnic groups, but in the form of OP's questions it's devoid of any question regarding history, and you can triple see that in the answers, as no one even mentioned what they are, let alone anything pertaining to history that would warrant this thread being made.It's also made with an incorrect assertion right at the start, claiming that Vlachs are start, implying that OP either didn't even bother googling anything about this group of people to even have a minimum level of knowledge necessary to have any sort of discussion, let alone historical, or that OP did know they are not Slavs and is simply making a bait thread. So not only is it not directly a conversation about history, it's also a low effort thread with no substance or meaningful attempts to discuss the history of this ethnic group, it's just a slide thread with absolutely zero insightful posts, besides the excerpt from Wiki that I posted.So yes, I think me asking why it's made in the first place when you can literally just google it and at the very least not create the thread the way OP did, with either bad-intent or zero knowledge is reasonable since it implies this is either a bait thread or a low effort thread, and the responses are not any different. I'm Croatian.
>>18539938serfs must die
>>18539938Your entire post is sub 60 IQ reddit-tier seethe rambling and what's even funnier you when you copy-pasted the Wiki article >>18539903 you forgot to read your own post and see that there are in fact Slavs referred to as Vlachs. This is the correct board for these topics, you are just a butthurt retard.>I'm Croatian.Sure you are sweetie, sure you are lmao
>>18539953There's exactly one minority group of Vlachs that speak a Slavic language but are of the same Wallachian origin... This does not change the fact that Vlachs are not a Slavic people, speak Eastern Romance languages and are from a part of Romania called Wallachia (thus Vlach). What's so hard to believe about me being Croatian?
>>18539961crorats need to leave too
>>18539961https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs_in_the_history_of_CroatiaIt took me 5 seconds to google this, you are 100% a butthurt Serb, ain't no way a Croat on /his/ would not know about Vlachs in Croatia. Pathetic piece of Untermensch trash, anglo dog, turkroached idiot, Russian cum guzzler or simply put a fucking Serb.>>18539966Samefagging retard lmao
>>18539977I can't tell if you are trolling or retarded, but I acknowledged Vlachs are a minority in Balkan countries. This doesn't make them Slavic in any way, I am telling you they are of Wallachian (Romanian) origin and that Wallachians speak predominantly an Eastern Romance language. They are not Slavs, just like having black people in France aren't French. We know what their origin is, what family their predominant languages belong to and where they're located the most.
>>18539977And I am finding it harder and harder to believe you are not OP, as you could literally just read the wikipedia article instead of baiting in this thread.
>open a thread about balkan>immediate schizo meltdown and falseflagging/samefagging accusationsnever change based retards kek
>>18539981nta but you are aware that eflaks or vlachs were a social and fiscal class in se europe? you could be a pastoral albanian and you would be considered a vlach
>>18540007Vlachs was used to refer to nomadic people in general (because that's what gypsies were). This does not invalidate anything I had said about Vlachs nor about the OP. Vlachs are not Slavs - they speak an Eastern Romance language; the very first thing you read when googling Vlachs is that they are from Wallachia. Vlachs are genetically not in any way Slavic. Vlachs live scattered all around the Balkans. Vlachs being used to refer to a nomadic class of people doesn't change any of these facts.
>>18540007I really don't understand the point of this thread, so I will not waste my time arguing here. All you want to read about it can already be read in much more detail on Wikipedia or other articles than anything you'd read on here.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs
>>18540018>>18540031my nigga you didn't read the article you posted for the second time in this threadI think you actually suffer from some kind of brain damage
>>18540041No, you are just stupid and think you got a "gotcha" by bringing up that it was used to refer to nomadic people and that it was a social thing (to avoid taxes - identifying yourself as such had no bearing on whether your genetic and ancestral identity was actually Vlach), when you open the thread with "Are Vlachs just Slavs", when they are a group of people who predominantly speak an Eastern Romance language, come from Wallachia (Romania) and are genetically not Slavic.
>>18540041https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map-balkans-vlachs_el.png
>>18540046these are my only posts >>18540007 >>18540041 in this threadyou are both mentally ill and mentally handicapped, my condolences anon
>>18539866kek
>>18539516Absolutely subhuman faces.
>>18539516Slavko Boljanović and Luka Boljanović are both worthless Vlach pieces of shit.
>>18539516The vast majority of them were random, Orthodox Slavic pastoralists/goat-fuckers, whereas the genuine Latinophones among them, the Aromanians, were an extreme minority before their population exploded in Ottoman Greece and Ottoman (southern) Albania (thanks to Ottoman Town Laws for the Aromanians).
Romanized Paleo Balkan people. Mostly thracians
