[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Was it actually british or was it jewish the whole time?
I have seen what anglos do and I don't think they're capable of colonialism. I think jews are capable of colonialism.
>>
Britain is practically the ideal nation for colonizing.
>effete norman elites grant a charter to colonize some shithole and reap the rewards of it
>saxons go and build it up
>shiteating celt peasants keep the homefires burning
>>
>>18539767
It was as jewish as any other extremely powerful state, jews originally filled up the HRE and then switched after the UK became superior.
For the first hundred years or so of anglos colonizing the americas, jews were expelled from the England. So your idea that anglos cannot colonize is very retarded.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.