>if so, why? abiogenesis destroys the atheist argument something by definition cannot arise from nothing, yet intelligence arose from unknowing, uncaring physics
>abiogenesis says life arose from nothing
>>18540159>using a question as a counter argument >citing goypedia as a source
>>18540163Source or GTFO
>>18540157"unknowing, uncaring physics" (whatever this means exactly) is not nothing. So you are really saying: "how can this thing come from this other thing?"
>>18540157>something by definition cannot arise from nothing, yet intelligence arose from unknowing, uncaring physicsThose two are not mutually contradictory. Unknowing, uncaring physics are not nothing.
>>18540157>something by definition cannot arise from nothingBabby thought that his logical framework inspired by classical mechanics to predict classical mechanics outcomes was true in of itselfThis was known to be wrong 200 years ago when thermodynamics was studied
To clear things up, events are not causal, but probabilistic, the probability of something outside of the more numerous stable configurations is powered a quintillion times and essentially absolutely negligible in our world.But necessity makes the most unlikely scenario possible to be materialized.The anthropic principle explains how the first principles actually derive from existence and not the opposite.Though we perceive time as going forward, the only reason we thing causality goes forward in time is because our logic is flawed
>>18540157>goddiditismthe formal argument name is "god in the gaps"
>>18540157>something by definition cannot arise from nothing>except for the god I believe in who created himself and then created the universe>atheists r destroyed by my flawless logic
>>18540157>something by definition cannot arise from nothingBut that isn't true. The existence of the universe disproves strict causality. Either the universe came into being from nothing spontaneously without a creator, or God came into being from nothing spontaneously without a creator. Regardless of whether you adhere to the theistic or atheistic viewpoint, your views acknowledge that something can indeed come from nothing.
>>18540159Hm?
>>18540157> something by definition cannot arise from nothing, except muh God who arose from nothingWhy are theists so openly retarded in 2026?
>>18540243All the atheist debate bros of the early 2000s transitioned to making culture war political content around 2014.
>>18540157stupid sexy robotneeds circuit correction
>>18540157Retard.
