The Real Presence is real, off that there is no manner of doubt. No probable, possible shadow of doubt. No possible doubt whatever.Transubstantiation has been substantiated at the Ecumenical Councils of the Fourth Lateran, Florence, and Trent. It is the truth that - by the means of a priest with valid Holy Orders acting in the person of Christ - the elements of bread and wine cease to exist and are replaced completely with the substantial Body and Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ our Lord that yet retains the accidents or outward appearance of bread and wine. The Lutherans have a heretical view of the Eucharist called ‘Sacramental Union’, that - in Martin Luther’s words - Jesus Christ is physically present ‘in, with, and under’ the bread and wine. My question is, can the Eucharist be said to be in, with, and under those who consume it? Could there be said to be a sacramental union of Christ in the communicant?
>>18540459There is no doubt left when you realize God, because God has no opposite.
>>18540459I didn’t read your post, because it contains traditions of men and the artwork is also hellish and doesn’t reflect Christ Jesus.Are you American? Have you ever wanted a politician to represent you more accurately as an American? I feel that more so with Trump than with any other president in my lifetime. He is best representing me than any other president so far. That is what the artwork does not do. It represents the Roman Catholic version of the Lord’s Supper, a ‘magic wafer’ like it was a Magic Wizard’s themed artistic version from world of Warcraft where they are too afraid to offend people. Basically Obama’s America is bad museum with his plaque of “Acknowledgement of the Indigenous People’s Land” and how bad colonialism was from white Christian Europeans.Now to answer your questions. God said in His Word that, yes, you are committing being with the body of darkness when you partake in that. You still have to ask each individual person if they accept the terms of whatever spiritual evil you are planing though, holy shit.Now are you bound to Jesus Christ even if you partook in spiritual ritual in darkness, and not in the light? Of course, it would still join you, but not fully in the Godhead, bodily. Only when done in the light, and in truth, and how He said to do it, are you fully bound to the body of Christ Jesus. Which just means that there is some darkness also trying to attach itself to Him, and God is above all problems. Meaning it doesn’t bother Him, though it will eventually be brought to a head and anger Him and He will cast it off. You can be assured of that. The question is what will you do? Continue to believe that the dark side of the force and being a Sith is worth it? Or turn from the dark and to the light and preach the gospel? The choice is always in your own heart and mind to do it and get right with God. Jesus Christ was the original scrolls that gave us the kjv bible made flesh. Not the apocryphal ones.
>>18540862The KJV originally came with the Apocrypha. Are you denying history or even your own eyes if you go to a museum?
>>18541784No, it did not. It had to be purified 7 times first. Apocrypha was thrown out because it literally doesn’t belong in it.You think books about the maccabees which is a literal crusades reference belongs? What about how God teaches us in Enoch that it was his fault the sacred angels began to cabnibalize humans? Get out of here Satan. You’re the one choosing your own version of satan’s Bible. The Ethiopian Bible has even more books than the Roman Catholic vulgate, proving your point as invalid. They are even more super Satan 4 than your 3.
>>18541854Elaborate on the 7 times it was purified.
>>18541854>>18542059Come on, I want to hear your case.
