>he's arrogantBut is he wrong?>he's culturally insensitiveBut is he wrong?>he punches downBut is he wrong?
>>18540704OP sucks cocks.
>>18540711But is he wrong?
>>18540704He secretly worships Lucifer.
>>18540704Punching down is a sign of low testosterone.
>>18540731Depends on what you mean, specifically. If I said most problems that black people face in America is self-inflicted, would that be punching down?
>>18540704>But is he wrong?Yes and he's already admitted that much. His latest cope is that he's "culturally Christian".
>>18540704Is this the guy who fell in love with a chatbot?
>>18540993What he calls "cultural Christian" was just being called normal pre-2010s. Back then, the progressives were atheist, liberal, modernist, and aracial. Now they're atheist, socialist, postmodernist, and antiracial. The culture of progressives has become regressive, which is evident by most people turning on them.
>>18541018>What he calls "cultural Christian" was just being called normal pre Atheist Movement and its consequencesYeah, that's what I said. He admits being wrong. If only his retarded followers had the sense to do the same.
>>18540704New/Militant Atheism is a dead movement because it offered no alternatives. The only fruitful thing it accomplished was making secularism mainstream, an ideology which is destroying the west.
>>18541061He never said he was wrong.
>>18541062Atheism is literally bigger than it was 15 years ago. Secularism has been the foundation of the West for 300 years.
>>18541061He never said that he's wrong. For example, believing gay people should be allowed to get married and believing children should be put on puberty blockers are very different things, despite both being called progressive.
>>18541062>new atheism is deadYes, two out of four literally have died
New Atheism was replaced with the cult of trannies and leftist mystery meat goblins. Mostly because it was even less unpopular than that, it was really hard to get anyone who wasn't a redditor who 'fucking loves science' to be passionate about being a rationalist autist and debooonking christian claims.
>>18540704He is, and his arguments are rather uninteresting.
>>18540704>But is he wrong?Yes. Can't you tell?
>>18540704Literally yes. About everything, including his random mutations + natural selection hypotheses that attempts (and fails) to immunize itself to teleological accounts even though he resorts to teleological language anyways.
>>18541213>>18541432>>18541546He literally isn't wrong about anything. You guys are all just retards who don't know what you're talking about.
>>18542619Good argument, transvestite.
>>18540704>>he's arrogant>But is he wrong?Yes.>>he's culturally insensitive>But is he wrong?Yes.>>he punches down>But is he wrong?Hmmm... yes.
>>18541546>fails) to immunize itself to teleological accountsThat's not necessarily on Dawkins. Naturalism in its current state doesn't consider teleology. This is a feature, not a bug, and Dawkins is forced to work inside this framework. You can argue that his orthodox submission to this paradigm led him to a misleading framing of the "selfish gene" narrative (as he basically admits), but he himself can't be held accountable for omitting teleology, as much as he is personally satisfied to discard it.>>18541175To be fair, it was high time that American creationists start getting deboonked. Shit was ridiculous. Sadly, the New Atheist movement turned out to be no less freaky...>>18540704Dawkins is a joke in scholarly circles for being completely wrong on most philosophy he attempts to address. I've heard people use his published "deboonking" of Thomas Aquinas as a deterrent example of laypeople trying to read ancient and medieval philosophy.
>>18541073>He never said that he's wrong."I'm a cultural Christian" is an admission that he was wrong in waging his intellectual war against Christianity now that he sees the actual consequences and how quickly Atheism goes to Atheism+.
>>18540731Depends. I respect the accelerate. Time is money.>>18540704filler
>>18540704bitch nigger say that shit about islam and muslims
>>18542917The "culturally insensitive" part is actually something I would always hear about atheists criticizing Islam and Judaism, not about criticism of Christianity. Christianity is regarded as the default religion in the West, so any attempts to criticize Christianity are just seen as philosophizing or critique of one's own culture, which is usually regarded as acceptable.On the other hand, whenever atheists like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Maryam Namazie criticize Islam, they usually talk less about theology and more about using hijab, female genital mutilation, and terrorism/murdering infidels, which are just cultural aspects of Islam rather than the more metaphyiscal aspects of Islam.Please do bear in mind that literally one of the first things mentioned in The God Delusion is 9/11, and also in Sam Harris' The End of Faith, and as everybody and their two gay dads know, the WTC terrorist attack (which we can discuss on /his/ now due to the 25-year-rule) was committed by Islamic terrorists (even if /pol/troon conspiracy theorists blame it on hidden explosives planted by Mossad agents).
>>18540993>>18541061>>18542902>admitted that he was wrongNo he hasn't. He has always said that he's culturally christian (article from 2007)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7136682.stmLeave it to christards to make up shit and think of that as some sort of win for their braindamaged cult.
>>18543836Funny how the christard hasn't apologized for lying yet.
