>>18541785
>founded on the principles of civic nationalism
It wasn't. Only white people were allowed to become citizens, then after the Civil War, 14th Amendment was written to ensure that freed black slaves and their descendants would be recognized as citizens (measures like the Chinese Exclusion Act were implemented to prevent Chinese people from becoming citizens)

you're not here in good faith but before this thread gets 300 replies;
>the constitution mentions voting rights only for land-owning whites (ignore the fact that most whites in the early US didn't own land because the land was typically owned by a small handful of colonist founding stock families and also ignore the fact that most Northern States allowed free blacks to vote by 1800)
2.) the 1965 Immigration act even though the idea of border security didn't even exist until the Cold War anyways

>>18541788
Irish, who were not considered white, immigrated to the US and were citizens. There were also minority communities of Sephardis and even Turks in the early USA.
The US was always open to nonwhite immigrants. Of course the total antithesis of Europe

>>18541789
> The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature

>>18541785
Cold War paranoia lead to a tightening of border security and the concept of immigrants as foreign agents as we know it today.
>>18541788
>It wasn't. Only white people were allowed to become citizens, then after the Civil War, 14th Amendment was written
Why are you on a history board if you don't know history?
Citizenship was not defined on a federal level until the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which predates the 14th amendment. Before this it was largely left up to individual states and abolitionist states did grant citizenship to non-whites

>>18541785
simple, would you want a gypsy to move next door to you with their 18 children?

>>18541840
American here
What are Gypsies actually like and why do they make Yuros seethe so much?

>>18541843
blacks but ten times worse according to them.

>>18541791
This was like 100 years after the nation was founded
It just goes to show how far back the subversion goes

>>18541843
its like blacks x pajeets

low iq estrogen filled violence of blacks and subservient larp while covertly and sometimes boastfully hating you and wanting to fuck you over the moment they can if you're not looking type of behaviour of the pajeets.

begging on the streets invoking god acting as if they are crying, and if you dont give them money they switch 180 and spit in your direction and curse you maliciously.

alone are giga pussies 1v1, and when buckbroken they organize their 40 cousins to find you as a group to fight.

lie all the time, looking for fights against anyone they can abuse all the time, stealing comes to them like breathing etc...

given shit by the government so they vote for them, protected by the government, given more rights, taxpayer money programs, sometimes even given whole apartments and things like that which they dont live in but rent out while going back to the street to steal and beg to double dip, lmao.

>>18541785
“Why can’t your country just be twisted, corrupted, and secularized like china so we don’t have to believe in God and respect the white Christian Europeans that were actually killed by the Spanish Inquisition if they were there because that was literally just the murdering of everyone who wouldn’t convert to Roman Catholicism?”
3 main ways changing from kjv bible to “modern translations” is killing your own soul:
Dilution, Omission, and Compromise.
Same thing is being done to our country. Turning it into casual language. Melting it to vague concepts. Ignoring history. Compromising for enemies.
The people here now don’t know English, don’t know why they are here, and don’t know why they should ever care.
Case closed.
You’re chasing real Christians who never were part of the Spanish Inquisition or the crusades and angry that we won’t fight for the dark side world you fought for to have. The people that we did have in Spain and Mexico were killed or fled or didn’t go there because they weren’t spreading the gospel.

>>18541843
They are litterally cockroaches in human form. Nomads that live off as beggars and/or thiefs. Their women are also infamous for trying to kidnapp non-gypsy toddlers to pass as their own (so they cannot be arrested as most country dont allow women with small kids to be sent in prison)

In burgerland you mostly get their nomad tribal "nobility", that pretend to live a upper class life thanks to the gibs made by their serfs in the old world with their multiple illegal acrivities

>>18541785
>Why do they complain about mass migration
If you want a truthful answer it's because it's depressing to see brown people flood every country in the world
>when their country was founded on the principles of civic nationalism and freedom of movement and religion?
Why should a 21st century wagie slavishly follow what a few dozen bougies and warlords cooked up 250 years ago in response to a very particular historical moment? Not to mention these men were slaveowners who didn't follow their own stated ideals

>>18541785
Because its a free country and we're allowed to complain our hearts out about anything and everything instead of being cowed into being forced to praise and accept things without a lawsuit first!
If you're shoving annoying and inconvenient ideas down people's throats, they have a right to be annoying and inconvenient back no matter how many schmucks or softies you talk to your side! 'Tis the law of the land!

>>18541791
>Irish, who were not considered white
False.

>>18541791
>Irish, who were not considered white
They were. What they were never considered is WASP (because they aren't). But since US independence, all Europeans with European parents were legally white and allowed to immigrate into the USA. Irish, Germans, Finns, Italians, etc. There were no restrictions for Europeans until they implemented a quota system in 1924, mainly because Italian anarchists and mobsters were an actual security threat by that time.

tl;dr all Europeans were always white under US law

>>18541785
>Why do they complain about mass migration
Why wouldn't they? "Mass immigration" would've been classified as an invasion just 60 years ago rather than some legitimate form of economic duct tape. These aren't some ~0.1% of foriegners who share the same cultural ideals or "values" at the very least. It's just masses of low class niggers complacently taking up entry level jobs and clogging up social services.
>their country was founded on the principles of civic nationalism
Lol. LMAO, even. The founders of the United States didn't believe that anyone other than landowners should vote.
>freedom of religion?
They were very vague about religion on paper beyond some platitudes about muh church and state. In reality they were each a different flavor of autistic enlightenment redditor.

>>18541785
Why won't billionaires pay taxes when their country was founded on the principle of political representation if taxpayers?

File: No proof.jpg (134 KB, 1080x723)

134 KB JPG

>>18541791
>Irish, who were not considered white
This narrative is so fake that even the famous "no Irish" signs are fake