Do Anglos, Germans, and Slavs have the credentials to larp as, or at least claim successors of the Ancient Greeks and Romans?I see many "medchad vs nordicuck" posts by Indians and Latin Americans making fun of those northern classicists saying that they are appropriating southern legacies and achievements when they were mudhut-dwelling savages who had to be civilized at some point, and then they backstabbed the Greeks and Romans by destroying their civilizations. Some Indians and Latinos even go as far to say that they are more qualified to claim Greco-Roman legacy as they all share brown/swarthy physical traits.I mean, heritage/phenotype is one thing, and I'm not big on the whole Nordicist supremacy shtick, but one thing that I feel Northern Europeans excel at is the fact that they actually continued the principles and intellectualism of the Greco-Romans, especially with the architecture and arts. Whether they are more qualified than Southern Europeans is a whole other can of worms, but European/Western civilization as a whole is more Greco-Roman than any other brown civilizations who push the whole division between Europeans. I mean, Latin American civilization is pretty Roman in some ways, but I don't necessarily think they are more roman than Anglo-Germanics.
Christians trying to be white nationalists is the funniest thing to me. Literally every Christian leader is anti-racist and happy to convert millions of blacks and browns and let them invade white countries, but they just pretend this isn't the case. Their religion is a spinoff of a Semitic desert cult that wiped out all the actual, indigenous European religions. Every single strain of Christcuckery is subservient to the Jews.
>>18542668>Do Anglos, Germans, and Slavs have the credentials to larp as, or at least claim successors of the Ancient Greeks and RomansNo. Greeks are still around, for one.
A mestizo is going to be much farther pulled away from the European portion of a PCA chart (by virture of native and/or SSA admixture) than any solely Euro population. An Italian is closer to a Roman than an Englishman but that same Anglo is going to be genetically much closer to a Roman than the average Mexican or Peruvian.
>>18542668Christcucks have no claim to pagan Greece or Rome. Rome died when Julian failed to stop the Christianization of Rome, Constantine was a traitor, and everyone who converted to Christianity lost their Hellenity and Romanity since those things were tied to Greco-Roman paganism.>>18542672Only Jews are bad Semites, the pagan Babylonians were fucking based
>>18542762The Babylonians ok but the Assyrians and Phoenicians were deranged fucks
>>18542668England and part of Germany were in the Roman Empire, so they can kind of do that whereas Slavs cannot.
>>18542668Glorious spic racial schizophrenia will be upon us in the coming decades
>>18542862Nah, the Assyrians and Phoenicians did nothing wrong.
>>18542668why would want to larp as shitskins? I genuinely lost all interest in the ancient greeks and their accomplishments knowing they were of an ugly, turdlike hue.
>>18542668Why would anyone claim to be successors of people from the past like it's a good thing?Did they understand the history books, if they read any?People before modernity were complete savages, they were violent for no good reason at all and despite all the copium about "muh the dark ages weren't dark" or "muh architecture", they were all around shitty people.It's great what it came with modernity. Sometimes I think aliens came and seeded some goodness in humanity for once and that's how we got the industrial revolution, the enlightenment and all that. I'm tired of pretending we're the same, because we're not. We're better.
>>18543477I feel this way about people from underdeveloped countries, who may as well be primitive humanoids that stepped out of a savage, premodern past. Just as you said, they're shitty, impulsively violent people who aren't like us - they haven't received the "seed of goodness" which brought modernity to Europe.
>>18543477we've made improvements within the lifetimes of still living people. do you consider how in the 50s-60s, a time still in memory, it was ok to do DV and your wife and kids were your property to do as you pleased with?
>>18542349in that time you had no rights to speak of at all. the king could just kill anyone he wanted or have sex with anyone he wanted, and he also decided for you what religions you were or weren't allowed to practice.
>>18543477because we all stand on the shoulders of giantssome giants accomplished and impacted us more than other giantsthe romans and british for example are far more influential than some random indigenous filipino tribe
bump
>>18542668Britain was part of the Roman empire and got abandoned rather than rebelled. And many modern Anglos are actually more Briton than Anglo. Then the Normans ensured some continuity and a great deal of cultural exchange with a more thoroughly Latinized people. So even beyond Western civilization as a whole descending from the Greeks and Romans, Anglos have a real, non-larp connection to at least the Romans.
>>18545040but some say that the anglos don’t count because they do not have any worthy british-romans, nor were they romanized, just still barbarian like bouddica who just ransacked villages and get btfo’d by a smaller roman armythis is different in comparison to hispanics, who were descended from important emperors like trajan and hadrian, and already had a flourishing civilization (or civilizations) before even the romans. plus they still maintained roman tradition during the middle ages, and their global empire was greater and more equal than the british.
>>18545768>t.
>>18542668This retarded spic doesn't know that northern europeans are more related to southern europeans than southern europeans are to spics
