[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How did they murder 6 million people in camps in just 4 years, all while losing an extremely costly war?
I'm not even baiting or a denier, I genuinely don't understand the logistics of it
>>
>>18543107
it was pretty much just rounding up a bunch of randos they already rounded up, its not really that hard, that and its not like the relative cost of it was even a real blip on the radar, the resources used for it would have certainly not made a difference in the war itself, that and due to the fact the ones they didn't instantly kill on arrival were used as slave labor said resource cost was even less
>>
>>18543107
They didn’t kill everyone in camps.
>>
I think they are saying at least half of that was Einsatzgruppe going around the villages doing the killings.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.