If people in different geographical locations have different skin color (races), which are easily visible visual traits - which basically define "race".Are there any systems to mentally categorize people in to groups. whether correlating with race or perhaps manage to draw slightly different borders to where say a half black person clearly retains a certain mental characteristic of either of the parents, even if their skin is neither white nor black. As in, leaving aside the skin color. Some examples I can think of are how some groups of people are said to have different temperament, but I wonder if there are actual systems for this or you can name any specific mental traits that correlates with race or certain region. And if there are any inheritable dominant mental traits, like say brown eyes, where you could have like drop of tar in the honeypot and a pure white person with one asian ancestor 20 generations ago, means they're bad at driving or something.An interesting thing I've heard people of color accuse white people (especially white men) of is - wanting to always fix everything. Being from the baltics myself where I have friends of finnic, slavic, nordic, baltic and germanic mixes, I can concur that people with a good amount of germanic or nordic in them, don't like listening to others complaining and jump to action to shut them up and "fixing" the issue, but in doing so, often create more issues.For people with more finn in them, I could say, they don't like to follow orders and are very stubborn in doing things the way they see right, even if given clear instructions. (indeed often their way does lead to same end result)Slavic people, on the other hand, i can't put my finger on and feel like they differ wildly in their mental characteristics as if not being a single group at all.
See the heritability of intelligence and personality traits. There are also a few other measurements, take your pick. (IQ, G factor, etc.)
>>18544851>I wonder if there are actual systems for thisGenetics?If you look carefully at racemixed kids, they are not a mix and match of different traits, like negro frizzy hair that happens to be blonde. The genes interact in unusual ways owing to the nature of how they are recombined with the alien DNA. For complex reasons sometimes a gene is "recessive" while another is "dominant", but the gene is still there and may still be expressed to an extent. Like a pigment is being produced, just less of it.It might be perplexing to a computer programmer who works in absolutes where if one tiny piece of code is changed the whole program fails, but it seems our genes were made to withstand a degree of mongling due to random mutations and sexual reproduction.>where you could have like drop of tar in the honeypot and a pure white person with one asian ancestor 20 generations ago20 is a lot. Whatever genes may be responsible for asians being bad drivers will be greatly diminished and overshadowed by the genes of the main race, I'd expect it to be negligible. It is more like octoroons being slightly lower intelligence than white people with no negro taint. 10% of white people have an IQ over 120 due to a number of different genes frequent but not prevalent in the white population coalescing and working in synergy to confer this trait. An analogy would be a slot machine, if they are lucky they get 3 cherries, these genes however are far less frequent among negroes, thus the 1/8 negro reduces the probability of them getting 3 cherries.An exact and comprehensive investigation of this has not been completed due to our society believing racial differences to be absolute heresy, but we understand enough that it would surely fit this framework.
>>18545649>An exact and comprehensive investigation of this has not been completed due to our society believing racial differences to be absolute heresy, but we understand enough that it would surely fit this framework.That seems like an asspull you are doing anon.
