In America it's completely normal for you to have entire parts of cities partitioned off as >"the black area">Chinatown">"Little Korea">The Yemeni zone">"Mexican area">"Little Puerto Rico">"Cuban quarter">"Vietnamese territory">"Mini Tehran"etcYou even openly label a place like Dearborn as "Muslim"But in Britain if someone says "Muslim area" or "Majority Indian area" or "Black area" etc, this is seen as a great calamity and an actual severe threat to national security and cohesion. It is seen as raging evidence of "non-assimilation" and "these people don't want to integrate". Debates are sent to parliament and questions posed about "why are these people here"Nothing like this exists in America. Even black thugs are like "Yo i got caught slippin' in dem Cholo niggas hood, dem niggas ain't playin' around". So even blacks accept there are parts of cities where a certain group or race lives and that's their territory. But in Britain saying "I got stuck in the Jamaican area" makes Brits panic and become irate - "hang on a minute, are we in England? why do we have Jamaican areas?"....So it's not something seen as a normal part of urban living by any means for the British. but no American cares if he lives 5 mins from Mini Puerto Rico, 10 mins from Mini Baghdad, and 30 mins from Little Lagos. This is all seen as part of the urban situation and city living.
>>18545452Americans are inherently nonwhite.
This thread and other threads similar to it in diction and style are made by a paki living in bradford who hates british people and shias.He literally makes 2-3 of these threads per day and posts them on /his/ and /pol/
>>18545487Yes i noticed the same thing, he's also active on /sp/. But i don't think he's a Paki i think he's an Arab as he has also been on /int/ and was typing in arabic on an anti-shia thread. he's definitely in the UK tho
>>18545452>easier than British?Holy esl....
>>18545452Because America had been a racially mixed society since it's founding, so seeing other races isn't perceived as unusual
