There is no reason that a GOOD god would have living creatures eat other living creatures.
>>18546009It's actually kind of beautiful if you take a step back away from a mortal perspective. Life feeds on life to keep life alive. Everything is devoured inasmuch as it ever has a chance to devour. We all matter because we are matter.
>>18546016Stockholm Syndrome
>>18546009Ya God could have just made meat a product at the store that has no causal or experiential relationship with animal suffering but he's retarded and evil and wants to project his evil onto his victims and accuse them of being complicit in his evil designs
>>18546021You can either spend your life resenting reality / the material world and fall into religion / esotericism in an attempt to depart from it eventually or you can try to appreciate creation and your place within it as much as possible. The former path usually ends in psychosis / existential terror - the latter actually leads to greater contentment eventually.
>>18546009God will charge every suffering onto the sinners. He will hold them responsible for all suffering along with Satan who they obey. Sinners will pay for all suffering on earth since the beginning of time.
>>18546009Yes, so one can serve and help another even after death.
>>18546009I can entertain an okish god creating nature but there's no way a good god created the deformed demon species that falsely calls itself humanity.
It's not so much the eating but the unnecessary cruelty and mistreatment that gets to me
>>18546278Death is still death. That pig in picrel >>18546009 is dead no matter what
>>18546016>It's actually kind of beautiful if you take a step back away from a mortal perspective. Life feeds on life to keep life alive. Everything is devoured inasmuch as it ever has a chance to devour.You're ignoring the built-in thermodynamic inefficiency.
>>18546030>>18546021you two are talking about two completely separate arguments and you're both right
