>uhhhhh no?Then you have to admit the failure of the USSR says nothing about communism as an ideology.
>>18546447It certainly didn't help.But no, slavs would not have "beaten" the west. Because they're slavs. Communism just hinders them even further.
>>18546447A communist West was unlikely to have risen due to its stronger political institutions + complex non agrarian economies. Marxism was already outdated by even 1917, hence its establishment was in the underdeveloped peasant/nascent industrial instability of Russia and Warlord China.
>Would a capitalist East have beaten a communist West in the Cold War?A Communist West in most timelines would mean that most of the White population in these countries would be genocided with the survivors fleeing to the USA or Russia to hopefully retake their homeland one day.
>>18546485Slavs have raped their way into Berlin and had a large chunk of Europe all to themselves, your copes are getting stale.Let go of your obsession already, freak.
>>18546485>>18546511"Slavs" don't exist
>>18546447>the failure of the USSR says nothing about communism as an ideology.(You)
>>18546517Neither do "Germanics", Celto-Roman rapebabies with Slavic and Baltic admixture.
>>18546447Only in the sense that the communist West would inevitably have to make economic reforms the way China did and end up authoritarian capitalist states with "communist" party dictatorships.
