Why is it so hard for athiests to understand that human thinking is definitionally limited and that saying God doesn't exist is the same as characters in a book saying the author doesn't exist? The only way saying God does not exist makes sense is if you say that experience is ultimately understandable with enough knowledge of isolated facts and the mechanisms connecting them, which is obviously not true. The game of chess is not just the understanding of the interaction of pieces but what it means for a piece to be taken and how to win the game, and the material and mental conditions in which a game of chess can exist in the first place.
>>18553187Yes anon it sure is challenging to argue that something doesn't exist within a framework that defines said thing as existing. Unfortunately none of that sophistry will ever demonstrate all that nonsense about Noah's Ark to be factual. Sure seems like someone's thinking is indeed pretty limited.
>>18553200Nothing I said necessarily means God exists, it just literally makes no sense to say God does not exist. Whether you say reality as it is makes sense or not is a seperate thing, but athiests sure act like it does and construct elaborate theories around it making sense. Choosing a worldview which makes no sense may be the correct one.
>>18553187>the world exists therefore this one specific religion is true instead of a thousand other onesWhy is it so hard for 4chan tradcaths to understand that this argument isn't convincing anyone?
