Does Big Bang prove creation ex nihilo, or does it merely suggest it?
>>18553828It doesn't do either. What the theory describes is the universe going from a very dense, very hot state to a less dense, less hot state. It doesn't say when or how the matter itself was created.
>>18553896Then it proves the reorganization of matter, proving Mormonism right.
The preexistence of the universe and matter and the emergence of structures from chaos is the common view in pagan religions, Mormonism just leans closer to them in many ways.
>>18553921>The preexistence of the universe and matter and the emergence of structures from chaos is the common view in pagan religionsThat's not really a pagan thing, it's just the way things actually are. If pagan religions thought of the world that way then they were right
>>18553926I'm just saying that if you look at pre-scientific worldviews, that particular view is only found in pagan religions which are more about change and maintenance, while Abrahamism emphasises "creation" in a way they don't
>>18553828>Does Big Bang prove creationNo, the term 'big bang' was a slight to a concept about the beginning/expansion. There is no evidence the uni started with only once expansion, in only one place, only one time. It could be just a local expansion, one of trillions. Humans are not capable of understanding the universe. Its like explaining taxation to your dog/cat. No one can yet understand what the double slip experiment actually means, and no one understands what a photon actually is. Photons exihibit some characteristics of particles, some of waves, but are neither. They may have many other properties humans are not aware of yet, or will never be aware of.
>>18553972No retard, I learned about photos at school
>>18553828No its just as far as we can see into the past. Time could be infinite beyond this observation.
>>18553828No
>>18553896It does posit a beginning to space, time, and matter coming into existence, which implies they did not exist prior to that point.
>>18554065It does not
>>18553972Nowadays the QFT explains the concept of wave particle way better than some duality or wtv
>>18554065My understanding is that it is the beginning of spacetime but not necessarily matter.
>>18553828where we came from isn't as interesting as what we are going to do next
>>18554077>explains the concept of wave particle way betterall theories and mathematical expressions are simplications and approximation of reality, but not reality. Its the best humans can do, but at least its an expansion and development of understanding that can benefit humans if used appropriately.
>>18554092How can matter exist without space or time?
>>18554146I've no idea. I supposed space could not exist if matter was condensed to the point where speaking of space does not even make sense, and space and time are apparently linked in some fucky way.
>>18554152>I've no idea.Then stop disagreeing
>>18553828Big bang itself has not been "proved", therefore it does not prove anything.
>>18554155No.
How do you still not know what the big bang is?It is literally just, "Everything is expanding at a rate, if we hypothetically go backwards then everything was once condensed 13.7 billion years ago." Lol.
>>18553828What caused the Big Bang?
>>18553828gravity is more a property than a force
>>18553828Most scientists are now moving back towards an eternalist model, concluding that the Big Bang was not the absolute beginning of time and space, but rather a cycle preceded by other cycles. The Big Bang for us was the heat death of a previous universe and the heat death of our universe will be the Big Bang of a future universe.Pagans were right, atheists and Christians are wrong. The universe is cyclical not linear. Cope
>>18553828It doesn't do either because it is a fiction. >>18553909>>18554718Have fun burning.
>>18553828>we don't know, therefore godNice try, faggot.
>>18554146Time existed, it just didn't pass since all matter in existence was in one place and the more dense something is the slower the time around it flows, thus time before the big bang was infinitely slow, then a singularity or some shit like that came around and the universe began to expand and time proper began
>>18553828Gods beyond the observation universe exist?
