How much of Chinese history is straight up faked?
>>18555319Around half as much as the so-called West's.
>>18555326Seething
None, unless you go all the way back to mythological eras like the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors
>>18555326>Around half as much as the so-called West's.Based and correct. Westroons live in a virtual reality where absolutely everything is fake.
>there are enough written records from dynastic era China that haven't even been read yet, enough for thousands of historians to spend all their lives analyzing>not counting records that aren't discovered yet or lost>not counting archeology, prehistory, material cultures>herp derp muh chinks fakeAmerican cope knows no bounds.
>>18555326>>18555345Any actual examples of this or just century of humiliation cope?
Almost none of it. Infact i wouldn't be surprised if even the mythology parts like xia was real, considering we have evidence of shang already.
>>18555372>have evidence of shang already.where
>>18555372We do have evidence of multiple artefact sites of the erlitou culture that correspond with the time period and capital of the Xia, but it’s all under a major city so it’s a major headache.
>>18555384This is impossible. They were literal caveman monkeys in that time period. If there isnt anything in England , there wont be jack shit in china.
>>18555383The oracle bones found near Anyang. They found some bronze weapons. Tombs too.
>>18555383https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=shang+dynasty+archaeology
>>18555385
The Yellow Emperor was real.
>>18555421>YellowLittle on the nose there
History has just been nonstop chinese century until the humiliation.
