I used to think the Portuguese were just as evil as other non-Hispanic empires because they took in far more slaves, but the more I look into it, they are actually good compared to other North Europeans.Most people in Angola have nothing against the Portuguese its always those who are outside of Angola and growing up in north European education, whether white or black, which deprives you of how Potuguese describe these events in their own words. Everything is positive, they established an alliance with Portugal hence why Mbanza Kongo is in Angola and not in Congo. Portuguese didn't vassalize anything. Portuguese are friends who we competed, with nothing else. These central Africans have been nothing but issues for every Bantu kingdom and continue to be in Angola.Meanwhile African countries still resent the British, Dutch, German, French, and Belgians, while maintaining good relations with Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians.
>>18576587USA slavery was far worseBrazil dont even dreamed to have the level of racism and segregation have, because its not part of Portuguese culture.The Portuguese who colonized Brazil dint have a culture of segregation, the opposite.In USA Slaves are forbidden to speak in their native languages, how to read or enter in peoples houses.In the Portugusees Empire there are no sich thing as “black” being a slave thing.f a Black man was catholic could buy his own freedom and be a citizen of the Empire.Catholics are forbidden to be enslaved, them the slave owners incentive that the slaves cultivate their culture and religion.Since by the law you cannot enslave Catholics.The majority of Brazilian population was natives converted to Catholicism and sbsorbed by the Portuguese empireIn Brazil schools are filled with black kids and was fancy to have well dressed and educated slaves. Most farm owners are alliterated with slaves not just taking care of their business but medics and things like that.The majority of Portuguese navi was filled with free Black citizens from the African colonies.The Portuguese Empire didn't cared about skin color, they want more citizens to expand they power and wealthy.
>>18576594In USA only blacks were slaves, in Brazil everybody could be slaves dont matter the color. The same for owners, a lot of slave owners were Black.If you aren't catholic and citizen of the Portuguese Empire you could be a Slave.While USA has pushing Jim crow laws, the majority of educated people in Brazil were black including the president in 1906, USA take one hundred years to have a black president.Many people has this wrong conception thaat Brazil had a crazy number os slaves when they heard the high number of Africans who went to the country.However theres not even possible, there are no so many rich people to buy so high number of slaves.The Portuguese Empire make a lot of African citizens colonize Brazil, was not uncommon that a sailor from Angola receive a land in Brazil as a prize for something he did.In USA Its aying that you could do terrible things against slaves in Brazil, in the late 1700s there was several laws for mistreat of slaves.Its a common fact that corrupt members of the government used those laws to take out slaves from adversaries.
>>18576587The Dutch were who most trafficked slaves in Angola, together with the germans companies of slaves and sugar. Dutch and Belgians cutted the hands of millions of Congolese people. The Portuguese made alliances with the king of Congo and the first Africans were brought to study in Portugal university, wich was a request of the king of Congo.The worst slavery system was the Dutch followed by the English and French. They were run by privateers and mercenaries, while in the Portuguese system it was the Crown that managed trade and security/defence.
>>18576587bump
Portugal is a memestate propped up by will of the Anglo alone.
>>18576598>in Brazil everybody could be slaves dont matter the color.The US had a war to fix that.Not slavery, but there being classes protected from enslavement.
All European imperialism was a good thing
>>18577591So is brown immigration in white countries, all immigration and imperialism is good
>greatest creation is a land of braindead favelamonkeyshuehuehue brbrbrbrbr?????????
>>18577631Uma delicia :DDDDDD
>>18577443it goes even further back.during the crusades, English landed on Portugal mistakenly and were payed to help defend their existence.
>>18577662It wasn't a mistake, the various kings of Portugal were very pro-Crusades and offered land to anyone who would join in on their own Crusade. It's why later on Portugal offered protection to the Templars and allowed them to rebrand
>>18577541Outrageously based
>>18576587the british way was right. The spanish and portugese did a mistake letting the natives live and importing too many slaves, which left a whole continent of mixed race orcs that will never sustain civilized standards of living. Moralfagging won't change that.
>>18576587Portuguese pretty much treated all their subjects (and many 100% Portuguese folk) as outright slaves and serfs even after slavery was "abolished".
>>18577733The British way still failed as well.
>>18576602Slavery was so bad in the Portuguese holdings near Kongo that slaves escaped into the Kongo Kingdom.
>>18576587As I point out in all of these threads - it depends on whether you think death is a bad thing or not, because in North America, they bred their slaves while in Portuguese South America, around 80% of the fresh imports became fertilizer within a year.>>18576598>there are no so many rich people to buy so high number of slaves.Yeah, Dutch banks financed those imports. It is known.
>>18576587Then why is latin America poor, but Anglo America (and Australia and New Zealand) rich?Checkmate
>>18578101>Anglo America (and Australia and New Zealand) rich?The financiers and resource owners are rich. The actual common man isn't that rich at all. That's always the big shocker people who visit or immigrate to the Anglosphere all experiance.
>>18576587>>18576594>>18576598>>18576602You're not med, paco joao de silvia sanchez.
>>18576598Brazil officially abolished slavery in 1888, decades later than the the rest of the americas, but unironically it continued for nearly 100 years by having unpaid black maids who grew up and lived with their "family". The practice was only made illegal in the 2010s.
>>18578119>The actual common man isn't that rich at allTrue now (still better off than latin America), but in living memory there was a large middle class and the average man lived well
>>18578119>senoooor erm you're not ACTUALLY rich you're basically the same as us o algoFavela monkey cope
>>18578132>in living memory there was a large middle classThat was in an era where most of the world was poor, existed solely as serfs and coolies and only jist became independent, or recovering from a massive war.>the average man lived wellPoverty was still rampant, disease outbreaks crippled and hospitalized many, many did not receive the benefits of the economic boom or faced a stronger economic decline right after.>>18578134Why are you in denial?
>>18577614No, brownoids are racially inferior. Its unironically only ok when whites do it
>>18578230>Its unironically only ok when whites do itSo why are they losing to East Asians and are currently being melted by heatwaves?
>>18578119>That's always the big shocker people who visit or immigrate to the Anglosphere all experiance.that's because the people who visit are middle/upper class fags back in their thirdie homelands used to having servants back in 'la patria' and are genuinely shocked that first worlders aren't treating working class firsties like some barely-literate indio quasi-slave from the backwoods of oaxaca
>>18578453That's some deranged projection on your part. Why do you instantly jump to a LatAm?>first worlders aren't treating working class firsties like some barely-literate indio quasi-slave from the backwoods of oaxacaLmao working class firstly are treated like ass and became the first to suffer pretty much any crises and labour repression/labour right loss.
>>18578487because the absence of maids/servants is one of the first things brazilians and latinxers will bring up about the differences between my country and their homelands lol.
>>18578494And your country is what exactly?
>>18576587Brown people morality is truly something to behold.Anglo colonialism you complain about, which is one that destroys the natives and takes over with anglos resulted in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand)not as strictly anglo they did end up making a deal with the maori). Portuguese colonialism in pure form = Brazil.Spanish colonialism in true form = Mexico, Venezuela, Argentina, Colimbia etc.Somehow there's always more people lining up to live in the hells on earth built by the Anglos than the paradises created by the browns. I don't know I have to watch some cartel execution videos maybe that will make me understand because I'm confused.Even in Africa, Anglo colonies are countries like Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe, that for all their issues were left in an alright state, with the natives having to try really hard. Moortuguese meanwhile have Equatorial Africa, which descended into dictatorship that made Pol Pot look sane within a couple of years from gaining independence. Spanish had very little but western Sahara is was just a laughable thing in general, Italians are interesting because they happen to have had a colony that was merged with a British colony when it gained independence - Somalia. For all the reality of it being a failed state, the British part is surely nicer. Eritrea meanwhile where the true spirit of brown colonialism taught the negro how to rule...So, in summary, brown colonialism good because it builds shit holes, Anglo colonialism bad because it doesn't. Btw, o algo please let my family into the US.
>>18578546This is enough of an /int/ thread without devolving into fullblown favelaposting
>>18576587portugal sux
>>18578134Agentinabros...Chileans were poor indios and northwest Argentina was white o algo...
>>18576587???? The reason Brazil is mostly white and mulattoe is because the portuguese slaughtered every native they came acrossThe spanish did the same to the south cone, caribbeans and northern mexico but everywhere else the spanish enslaved the natives rather than full genociding them, the portuguese empire was absolutely barbaric
>>18579240In fact the europeans who genocided natives in brasil are called bandarates and are hailed as heroes there especially in one particular state
>>18578130Based
