[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(60).png (3 KB, 547x365)
3 KB PNG
How come arabs are inbreds and total retards but jews are inbreds and super smart?
>>
OP here, I'm trans btw.
>>
>>18577511
Different styles of inbreeding.
Jews = tiny founder population but little marriage between close relatives since
Arabs and pakistanis = larger founder population but married their cousins for generations.
The latter causes long runs of homozygosity and more health issues as the UK healthcare system has gotten to experience.
>>
because inbreeding isn’t necessarily deleterious and is all about which specific traits you select for

having said that Jews seem to have more genetic illnesses than the average Arab though
>>
>>18577522
>>18577522
>little marriage between close relatives since
Fucking the same small dating pool over and over again that doesn't really expand is effectively fucking close relatives (outright is) and leads to the same set of genetic diseases being passed on.
>Arabs: larger founder population but married their cousins for generations.
Arabs populations moved around, mixed with other Arabs and non-Arabs. Married out and cousin marriage wasn't back to back or within the same family tree subsection. I think you are conflating isolated Bedouin and mountain Pakistani as representative of their wider groups which is total false.
I always find it weird people think Hapsberg tier family fucking and some Arab guy with an Albanian father marrying a woman with an Sudanese mother is the same thing.
>>
>>18577748
>some Arab guy with an Albanian father marrying a woman with an Sudanese mother is the same thing.
Who's mother for the former and father for the latter are siblings. Forgot to clarify.

>>18577522
>The latter causes long runs of homozygosity and more health issues as the UK healthcare system has gotten to experience.
Because back in the day Pakistan made a hydro dam and needed to relocate people and coincidentally UK had a labour shortage. Those people in particular where from. Pretty isolated area akin to say Sardinia, many parts of Finland or the really mountainous parts of Europe. So when they came to Europe many who weren't directly related still came from the same genetically isolated gene pool which meant that inherited diseases common to them were more prevalent.
>>
File: 41576.jpg (251 KB, 1050x2407)
251 KB JPG
>>18577748
Even if you occasionally marry a foreigner but generally practise first cousin marriage you will become inbred. Middle East/West Asia is far more inbred than Europe, only some isolate populations are comparable. And this is because of Islamic cousin marriage, otherwise there'd be no difference.
>>
>>18577753
Here you can see the effect of islamic cousin marriage btw. Balochis, a population of millions, muslims, more long runs of homozygosity than Kalash, a very isolated and tiny population in a valley, the small population size is visible in larger number of ROH compared to Balochis.
>>
>>18577753
>generally practise first cousin marriage you will become inbred
You won't. Actual deleterious and harmful inbreeding is people fucking family up and down the tree.

>Middle East/West Asia is far more inbred than Europe, only some isolate populations are comparable
Europe was urbanized way longer anon. Also increased population movements between states in the 1800+ years.
>And this is because of Islamic cousin marriage, otherwise there'd be no difference
Again either the obssession on cousin marriages. In South Africa every group in it is by your definition "inbred" because they all married and fucked within restricted dating pools and you have the genealogy records and DNA results to see that. Why focus on Arabs and Paki's? Why no large swathes of South and Central America or Africa/Asia with insular population pools? I only see British chuds obssess about this.
>>
>>18577778
Then there's Finalnd with an actual large cataloged of Finnish Heritage Diseases due to the several population bottlenecks that led to the proliferation on said inherited conditions.
>>
>>18577511
Because Jews value education while Muslims do not. Thus Jews are smart while Muslims are impulsive retards.
>>
File: 1254536366.png (299 KB, 850x957)
299 KB PNG
>>18577778
>>18577779
I already mentioned population isolates in Europe, Finland and Basque country are 1% of Europe's population combined. Overall Europeans are much less inbred than muslim arabs and pakistanis.

And Africans aren't inbred unless they're from small isolated tribes. Let's compare Oromos and Amharas (no cousin marriage or muslim majority, millions of people) to Somalis (cousin marriage, millions of people). Again we see an accumulation of ROH in the Somalis (the violin plots in graph b). The difference is much bigger than that between an island population and a mainland population (Japanese and Chinese) or isolated population and a non-isolated population (Finns and Tuscans). And it's caused by first cousin marriage.

Bengalis are an example of a big muslim population that doesn't have this issue because they have consanguineous marriage rates of <10% while Pakistan has 60%..
>>
File: 1125235326.png (69 KB, 1414x877)
69 KB PNG
>>18577778
>You won't. Actual deleterious and harmful inbreeding is people fucking family up and down the tree.
Wrong. For example no parental incest here, or even uncle-niece marrage which happens in some parts of the Near East. Multi-first cousin marriage caused the issues of Ferdinand I.
>>
>>18577511
Most of them remigrated from the west.
Meanwhile the smarter arabs run away to the west, leaving the most inbred retards behind.
>>
Jews being smart is a myth
>>
>>18577975
>leaving the most inbred retards behind.
Many of the educated ones still do research in the ME.

>>18577842
The amount of DNA shared between first cousins is about 12.5% of their DNA on average. That ranges between ~7% and 13%. The Hapsburg were directly fucking members up the tree as in their own uncle's or worse.
>>
>>18577827
>Africans aren't inbred unless they're from small isolated tribes
Whites coloureds and blacks are all "inbred" due to their isolation.

>Let's compare Oromos and Amharas (no cousin marriage or muslim majority, millions of people) to Somalis (cousin marriage, millions of people)
Many Oromo are Muslim you retard and Somali's marry within their own clan (many also marry outside) which number in large numbers you retard.

>Bengalis are an example of a big muslim population that doesn't have this issue because they have consanguineous marriage rates of <10% while Pakistan has 60%..
You do know Indians also have high cousin marriage, why don't you mention them?
>>
>>18577842
Charles 2 was so inbred that his genetics were were more concentrated than if his parents had been full siblings. Maria Antonia was worse as she was more inbred than child/parent and bro/sis incest.
>>
>>18577827
>Finland and Basque country are 1% of Europe's population combined
Still large populations you dishonest fuck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_heritage_disease
>>
>>18577522
>Jews = tiny founder population but little marriage between close relatives since
what drugs are you on? The jewish founder population is canaanites/phonecians. They were fucking huge in the antique, and fairly big today too. Jews, Palestinians, Lebanese, Jordanians and Syrians all belong to this group

Or are you thinking of askhenazi jews specifically?
>>
>>18578421
You seem upset, but that's expected if you're a muslim defending first cousin marriage, a retarded thing you feel obliged to do on religious grounds. Yes, there are a lot of inbred groups in India too, meaning those who practise cousin marriage. Pakistan is an entire nation of Habsburgs.

>Many Oromo are Muslim you retard
So are the Bengalis, what doesn't make them have long runs of homozygosity unlike Somalis and Pakistanis is the lack of systematic inbreeding, meaning first cousin marriage.

>>18578422
Yup, and you do not need to marry your sister for that to happen, only multiple generations of first cousin marriage.

>>18578432
Obviously ashkenazi.
>>
cuz arbs are evil and israel iis good
>>
>>18577511
Phoenician genes trickled down.
>>
File: Uyghur-hunter-Kashgar.jpg (73 KB, 960x672)
73 KB JPG
>>18577511
How inbred are Uyghurs?
>>
File: 1506705493601.jpg (23 KB, 324x324)
23 KB JPG
>>18580012
And Volga Tartars too
>>
>>18579788
Jews are malice and evil incarnate



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.