If we accept:1) Cromwell's Rule and do not assign an apparent probability of 1 to the Catholic Church's Infallibility 2) The Catholic Church will continually decree claimed-infallible propositions3) The external apparent epistemic probability each of these propositions are true does not increase in such a way that they eventually approach 100%4) These propositions' epistemic reliance on each-other is not perfect (proving one such proposition false does not prove them all false)Then:the Catholic Church will have, at some point, eventually decreed an apparently false claimed-infallible proposition If we accept that:5) The Catholic Church teaching a false proposition as infallible falsifies the church Then:The Catholic Church will eventually be apparently falseif we accept that:7) We should not accept apparently false thingsThen:We should eventually not accept the Catholic ChurchBut if we accept that:8) If there is ever a temporal point where we should not accept the Catholic Church, we should never accept the Catholic ChurchThen:We should never accept the Catholic Church
k
Is that a boy or girl angel? I only like my angels on the male side.
why is no one entertaining my awesome argument ? hello ? heh, is this thing on ?
>>18580345>do not assign an apparent probability of 1 to the Catholic Church's InfallibilitySo we part from the supposition that the catholic church can be false, which is a false assumption because the catholic church is indeed true.
>>18580345What is this, did you just get out of Mathematical Logic class and decide to use it on the Catholic Church?We shouldn’t accept any church that rejects universality of the gospel and that the gospel lets you into heaven (become the bride of the lamb of God). I believe in New Testament sound churches. That th gospel came from the Word of God. The Word of God gave us Jesus Christ. That believers in that leads to baptized believers (bride) whose sins were washed in his blood, his name, his Word, and that this God is the Creator of everything. If we accept that , then we can start applying equality to every one and start making sense out of all of our differences.There is white, black, oriental and then mixed. When we wrote the Declaration of Independence , we were just white Christians with kjv bibles wanting to give Christian’s religious freedom to worship God free from the Catholic AND Protestant (also Rome Catholic) insanity of trying to control us how we worship God. If you think you NEED to dress up for Halloween as Aaron and Moses to have church, be our guest, but Jesus, quit saying all of us have to. This is America. So our founding fathers didn’t really think about well what about blacknpeople because they didn’t really have time to thank God. If they had been told to think about it then we’d separate laws and it wouldn’t have come out written down like they did. They wrote it out of innocence “we the people”.What I am saying is that we all grow white over time. If you are Christian than you are already white spiritually and going to get a crown of glory (white hair). And skin turn pale as you die. But not everybody softens their hearts to the idea that we are all white (we aren’t in reality, but we are all spiritually brothers and sisters in Christ past the outward appearance once we accept Christ Jesus).Anyway, I neither want to be Protestant nor Catholic. I just like sound New Testament churches (still kjv bible).[///]
>>18580345>I cannot accept this thing that might eventually become another thing!If you accept that, then you should not accept life because you will eventually die
The whole notion that there is hot churches (unyielding wall of faith against all science), and that there is cold churches (adaptation/mutation to accommodate teaching of abiogenesis, evolution from abiogenesis/tape worm ancestor, big bang theory, zero point energy universe theory, etc) that they are separate and don’t share universality together is risky in that you can tear the fabric of people’s consent in their brains. People want to be where they want to be on those topics and people create a place for it so then people go to where they wanna be on it. Till their mind realizes the literal bold faith lens interpretation is where the light of God is and it’s dark in the cold (God really can do anything, for nothing is too hard for the Lord).
I prefer “such a worm as I.”“God made us from the dust.”To tape worm ancestor,And abiogenesis theory. But once learned they are still next to each other in the brain. Fully understanding either one.I still know the Bible is true literally because nothing in that universe is going to be memorable to the soul. It’s like trying to recount all of your video games to your parents. There is nothing in there worth sharing. They are only glad that you had a good day having fun sharing life with them in the universe. That’s why the Bible and God focuses on what treasures you can actually share from out of your heart.