Historically speaking, firearms were better when they had wooden stocks, it made your rifle feel more artisan and gave warfare a more soulful aesthetic. The world lost something when we switched to sterile plastic stocks in the mid-20th century, it made warfare appear more like a cold, sterile operation. If you're going to murder people, you outta at least use a respectable looking weapon against them. Plastic firearms are disrespectful
>>18580511>>>/k/
>>18580519>NOO, STOP CONTRIBUTING TO THE BOARD WITH BEAUTIFUL QUALITY THREAD. MIGRATE SOMEWHERE ELSE SO THE SCHIZOIDS CAN CONTINUE TO RUIN THE BOARDKys
>>18580511Indeed a tragic loss, though it is emblematic of a greater problem. Military technology and aesthetics all were homogenized. Before the midst of the cold war, the technology, doctrine and aesthetics were an expression of the respective countrie's culture and mentality, nowadays it is all just the same americanized operator-culture multicam slop.
>>18580511True. The slippery slope is a law of nature. Plastic guns paved the way to being killed by trannies piloting plastic flying toys.
It's all irrelevant now they get a flying grenade slamming into the side of their head whenever they pop out of their ratholes.
